Explore the world of Thirty Flights of Loving through a first-person short story. In this sequel to Gravity Bone, take a deep dive with high-flying schemers, lovelorn criminals, and more stray kittens than you can shake a stick at. Saddle up, gunslinger. Featuring an original soundtrack by Chris Remo.
使用者評論: 褒貶不一 (977 篇評論)
發售日: 2012 年 08 月 20 日

登入好來將此遊戲加入您的願望清單或是標記為無興趣

購買 Thirty Flights of Loving

 

由多名鑑賞家所推薦

"A short, sharp burst of first-person, spy-themed adventure with magnificent style."
點此閱讀完整評論。

評論

"It’s made by someone who has spent a long, long time thinking about how to tell linear first-person stories, and who has found a new way to do it better than anyone else."
PC Gamer

"Chung spins a memorable yarn, delivers it with confidence and panache, and trusts you to put all the loose ends back together."
- Wired

"What's truly impressive is the narrative weight and emotional impact it delivers in such a short span of time."
- 8/10 ign.com

關於此遊戲

Explore the world of Thirty Flights of Loving through a first-person short story. In this sequel to Gravity Bone, take a deep dive with high-flying schemers, lovelorn criminals, and more stray kittens than you can shake a stick at. Saddle up, gunslinger.

Featuring an original soundtrack by Chris Remo.

系統需求

Windows
Mac OS X

    Minimum:

    • OS:Windows XP/Vista/7
    • Processor:1GHz
    • Memory:512 MB RAM
    • Graphics:60MB OpenGL-compatible
    • Hard Drive:90 MB HD space

    Minimum:

    • OS:Mac OS X 10.5.8 or later
    • Processor:1GHz or faster
    • Memory:512 MB RAM
    • Graphics:800x600 or greater screen resolution
    • Hard Drive:200 MB HD space
值得參考的用戶評論
28 人之中有 19 人(68%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
0.3 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 10 月 27 日
What the ♥♥♥♥ did I just play? Seems like some tragic, espionage, psychedelic, love story. Strangely enough, I still enjoyed it
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
27 人之中有 18 人(67%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.9 記錄時數
張貼於:01 月 4 日
While the game IS fun, and the art style is one that I enjoyed, for the price it is not worth it. It costs about half the price of a movie ticket, and you can beat it in less that 20 minutes. I in-depth played it (Stopping to read all the cards, payed extra attention to the environments, and tried to explore best I could, etc.) AND played through a second time on commentary mode, only to find myself clocked in at a little less than an hour. I wish the game were a lot longer and offered a lot more. It's a great story, but for 5 dollars you should just watch it on youtube.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
17 人之中有 12 人(71%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.7 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 10 月 26 日
Let me start off by saying this is much less a game than it is an art piece.

Thirty Flights of Loving takes you on a short and wonderfully confusing journey through dramatic and intense sequences. It took me about 10 minutes to beat, but the developer commentary gave me insight into the process of developing the game.

It feels very personal, and when it ends it leaves you wanting more, but having more would potentially spoil the experience.

If you're looking for a short artsy game with a story that you have to work for, then consider checking this out. If you have it in your Steam library and haven't played it yet, give it the 10 minutes of your time it asks for.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
14 人之中有 9 人(64%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.6 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 10 月 26 日
Eh, I liked it. I wish there were more flights to love and more birds to photograph. It didn't take long to finish, and it gets pretty weird.
But I thought it was time well spent.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
6 人之中有 4 人(67%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.7 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 10 月 15 日
I really enjoyed the experience of playing Thirty Flights of Loving, but know what you are getting in to. It's a really interesting narrative, but I almost think it would have been better suited as a short film than an interactive experience as it's completely linear and you aren't really adding anything by being in control of the character because there are very few things to interact with.

But that being said, the presentation is great. The art direction is compelling, Chris Remo provides another great soundtrack, and the scene right after the open credits got to me more than any AAA game I can think of. I wish it was a little bit longer (about 15 minutes) and include a bit more interaction, but it's still an absolutely worthwhile experience. Although if I'm being honest, when I wanted to play it again a few months later, I ended up just watching a YouTube playthrough because it's almost the exact same thing and I didn't have to fire up Steam.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
8 人之中有 5 人(63%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.9 記錄時數
張貼於:01 月 19 日
Thirty Flights of Loving 9 / 10
Oct 23, 2013

A five minute Quentin Tarantino game/movie;
An interactive movie trailer between Pumpkin and Honey Bunny;

Yeah no sh*t - this lasts only five minutes; so I played it ten times for a total of 50 minutes hoping to get some Steam Cards.... (warning - did not work : p)

Do you make games? You figure out how to fit something like this into your game as an Interlude and Bingo you have a Hit within a Hit; hilarious and intense potential.

Check this out....
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
8 人之中有 5 人(63%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
0.5 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 25 日
Your a spy and the game is a story depicting your life. Short sweet and fun.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
10 人之中有 6 人(60%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
1.2 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 3 日
Looked promising and interesting when I saw the screenshots. Finally got it for half-price in the sales (IDK £4 seemed a bit steep) so I was really excited when I got to play it. I started it up and was like "Ooh this is interesting..." and then again two minutes later "Um I don't really get it but it's going somewhere right..."

And then five minutes later it was over. FIVE MINUTES OF GAMEPLAY (Not inc. the 15 minute game you can get for free from the intertwebz). At half-price it still wasn't worth it. Nowhere near!

Potentially an interesting concept/ story, rushed into a tiny, meaningless prototype thingy.

At the very least this game should be free.

Tl;dr: I want my £1.99 back.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
12 人之中有 7 人(58%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.2 記錄時數
張貼於:01 月 7 日
An intensely surreal time, difficult to recommend at any kind of price-range given how abbreviated the experience is but still manages to be an interesting take on the "games as art" bandwagon. Can't be recommended as a purchase but worth watching a youtube playthrough of.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
3 人之中有 2 人(67%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.4 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 10 月 24 日
It's quirky and different. For all the effort that went into this "game" it was well worth the $5.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
3 人之中有 2 人(67%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.7 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 9 日
You are your own enemy
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
3 人之中有 2 人(67%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.9 記錄時數
張貼於:01 月 7 日
What?

Yes.

What?

I'm on a bike!
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
7 人之中有 4 人(57%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.4 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 11 日
I'm the type of guy that will wholeheartedly recommend a short game if it has a good story. Even if the price tag is sometimes a little over.

Year Walk, To the Moon, Brothers: A tale of two sons, Limbo, Deadlight, Thomas was alone, Spec Ops: The Line.

The list goes on. All short games. All have great stories. All I would recommend.

I would not recommend this game.

I don't want to sound like an ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ but it feels like this game was made by some hipster who wanted to make an art piece out of a game. It didn't work.

I really feel that all the positive comments about this game are from people who are trying to make it clear that they support innovation and creativity in video games. That's great, but this "game" really isn't.

As I said before, length isn't usually an issue for me. However, I've played 20 minutes of this game and I've completed it three times. That's ridiculous. It could have the best story ever told ever by anyone ever and it would still be ridiculous that I can complete it three times in just over 20 minutes.

And that's what's worse. You watch the trailer and it says at the end

"Tells a better story in 13 minutes than most games do in 13 hours." - PC Gamer

Now, I like PC Gamer, but that is such a stupid statement that it's practically a lie. Its actually a really cheesy, sub-par romantic story. I won't spoil it, just in case you refuse to listen to me. I'm not that much of a ♥♥♥♥.

And above everything else, it is BORING. You'd be surprised at how bored you can get in a game that takes less than 10 minutes to complete. The story is boring and the gameplay is boring. At least in Dear Esther and Gone Home, the story was good and it lasted longer than 10 minutes.

Walk around for 10 minutes. Engage in a plot that will leave you bored and with no attachment whatsoever to the characters. You've completed the game! Wasn't that great?! That'll be £4 please.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
10 人之中有 5 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
1.7 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 10 月 29 日
these 15 minutes of gameplay gave me an erection
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
6 人之中有 3 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.6 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 10 日
what the ♥♥♥♥
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
4 人之中有 2 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.8 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 29 日
LMAO
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
1.2 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 10 月 9 日
It's fifteen minutes of what amounts to a tech demo of non-linear narrative approach in games. It's also really cool.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.2 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 11 日
I've played this for 15 minutes.... Its pretty good, or atleast powerful. That being said, I don't reccomend you buy it, atleast not for 5 bucks. For a Dollar, it would be a great value, I suggest waiting for a bundle, because even those 15 minutes are worth experiencing.... just not for 5 bucks.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.2 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 18 日
I dont know what just happened....
10/10
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.4 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 18 日
IT TOOK 15 MIN TO DONE THAT
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣