精选物品
游戏
软件 试玩 新闻 推荐
Paranautical Activity combines the classic FPS action of games like Doom and Quake, with the randomness and difficulty of modern roguelikes like Binding of Isaac and Spelunky.
发行日期: 2013年2月14日
观看所有 2 段宣传片

抢先体验游戏

立刻获取体验权限然后开始游戏,并随着游戏的发展参与其中。

注意:该抢先体验的游戏内容在开发进程中也许会发生大幅度的变化。如果您目前不是特别想玩这款游戏,那么您可以等待一段时间,直到游戏得到进一步开发。了解更多

开发者的话:

“Paranautical Activity is currently in an extremely functional beta form. The game plays great already, and we're working hard to make it even better. We're planning to add a ton more content, and of course some bug fixes and polish.”
了解更多

购买 Paranautical Activity

最近更新 查看所有(14)

PA 1.8.1 Mini-Patch Released

8月8日

The changelog is as follows:

fixed floor staying dark when falling through a hole in a dark floor

fixed boss health bar staying on screen when falling through a floor during a boss fight

fixed mermaid killing herself

fixed snail randomly damaging player until they die

fixed not returning to menu after credits end

fixed the golden scissors powerup removing the scissors item

fixed problem that was causing occasional stuttering

fixed crosshair showing up in credits

fixed occasionally being able to see up into the level after falling through a hole

fixed shop corners not touching

fixed being able to escape the elevator after sending it to the nextfloor

fixed powerups intersecting objects

added more fanart to the credits

added proper credit for sound effects

added davy jones locker item to item pool

added unique sounds for each powerup

tweaked rocket sound to make it quieter

tweaked (SECRET SPOILER) explosive barrels to make them sometimes drop bombs and the blast shield item

tweaked special room (armory&trap room) frequency. made them more rare

11 条评论 了解更多

Humble Weekly Bundle - Gamepedia

7月10日

https://www.humblebundle.com/weekly
Paranautical Activity is in it!

4 条评论 了解更多
查看所有讨论

在讨论版中为这款游戏汇报 BUG,并留下反馈

关于游戏

Paranautical Activity combines the classic FPS action of games like Doom and Quake, with the randomness and difficulty of modern roguelikes like Binding of Isaac and Spelunky.

系统需求(PC)

    Minimum:
    • OS: Windows XP or better
    • Processor: ntel P4/NetBurst Architecture or its AMD Equivalent (AMD K7)
    • Memory: 2GB GB RAM
    • Graphics: Intel GMA 950 or AMD Equivalent with OpenGL 1.2 Support
    • Hard Drive: 300 MB available space
    • Sound Card: N/A

系统需求(MAC)

    Minimum:
    • OS: Mac OS 10.5.8 or better
    • Processor: ntel P4/NetBurst Architecture or its AMD Equivalent (AMD K7)
    • Memory: 2 GB RAM
    • Graphics: Intel GMA 950 or AMD Equivalent with OpenGL 1.2 Support
    • Hard Drive: 300 MB available space
    • Sound Card: N/A
有价值的用户评测
10 人中有 9 人(90%)觉得这篇评测有价值
0.2 小时(记录在案的)
抢先体验时期的评测
令人失望,看游戏描述才去下的,说的挺不错的,说是FPS模式,但是地图和道具是学习的以撒的结合,本来我是很喜欢这类随机游戏的,但是这玩意的职业设定实在是太差劲了,射击也毫无手感,打子弹就像乒乓球一样,生命居然也是学习以撒,我觉得这种应该改成血条更为合适。
发布于:5月1日
这篇评测是否有价值?
4 人中有 4 人(100%)觉得这篇评测有价值
0.6 小时(记录在案的)
抢先体验时期的评测
玩出了雷锤的感觉..画面比较暗,场景单一,怪物也没做声音,但总体还是不错的
发布于:4月2日
这篇评测是否有价值?
365 人中有 314 人(86%)觉得这篇评测有价值
8.1 小时(记录在案的)
抢先体验时期的评测
The game itself is not bad. I've found it decently enjoyable. Not a huge amount of replay value, but I got to the end once. The problem with Paranautical Activity is the developer.

The developers have continuously insulted and mocked people who bought their game. In addition, they have been less than honest. The game was marketed for over a year as having co-op incoming (and as of this review, the store page says the developers are still working on it), yet that feature was suddenly canceled. The developers insist they have been working hard on bugfixes and content updates, yet have not released anything, even missing a promised deadline by over two months (patch is yet to be released as of this review). Furthermore, the devs have been silent on the forums (when not aggresively insulting the people who bought their game) and insist you should visit their website, where they will keep people updated; visiting their webiste reveals no new news in two months, and the last message was just an apology for a delay (that has still not been resolved). And when fans have the nerve to say they aren't being treated fairly? The devs say people are "entitled." Do not buy this game, do not support this kind of rude immaturity from developers, do not support Early Access games that are deceptively marketed.
发布于:5月6日
这篇评测是否有价值?
185 人中有 147 人(79%)觉得这篇评测有价值
1.5 小时(记录在案的)
抢先体验时期的评测
The game had lots of promise, and planned features that won't ever see the day. The developers, in the steam store page, say "We're planning to add multiplayer co-op in the very near future.." and now they have scrapped that feature entirely without any sort of compensation to the people who bought the game for this exact reason.

Do not buy this game. Do not support Code Avarice (the developers) in any project they choose to move on to. They've taken our money and they've abandoned their game.

As for the actual review:

Pros: Rogue-like FPS.

Cons: Very shallow. Clunky movement. Everything feels the same after playing for 5-10 minutes. There is just so very little content that it is insulting to call it a Rogue-like.
发布于:5月8日
这篇评测是否有价值?
93 人中有 75 人(81%)觉得这篇评测有价值
4.4 小时(记录在案的)
抢先体验时期的评测
Steam's "Early Acces" is about giving you early acces to a game to see it in developement, until it's 100% done, for your early support to the developers. And for your money you should get a product with all the features they promised.

Steam's "Early Acces" isn't about buying a half-made game and be happy after that anyway, no matter if the devs abondon it or cut out important features they advertised.

"On Steam, developers make their own decisions about promotion, features, pricing and publication. However, Steam does require honesty from developers in the marketing of their games." - Chris_D - Valve Employee

Many of us bought extra copies of this game cuz the devs advertised it with a co-op function arriving soon and we all got scammed.
They arrogantly refuse to settle the situation and ban people from the Community Hub who complain about it.

Valve, please protect your customers!
发布于:5月15日
这篇评测是否有价值?