Hack ‘n’ Slash is a puzzle action game about hacking -- reprogram object properties, hijack global variables, hack creature behavior, and even rewrite the game’s code. The only way to win is not to play...by the rules!
用户评测:
Overall:
褒贬不一 (578 篇评测) - 578 篇用户的游戏评测中有 57% 为好评。
发行日期: 2014年9月9日

想要将这件物品添加至您的愿望单、关注它或标记为不感兴趣,请先登录

购买 Hack 'n' Slash

含有此游戏的礼包

购买 Spacebase DF-9 + Hack 'n' Slash

Includes both games and their soundtracks!

购买 Double Fine Bundle 2015

包含 16 件物品: Broken Age, Broken Age - Soundtrack, Brutal Legend, Brutal Legend Soundtrack, Costume Quest, Grim Fandango Remastered, Grim Fandango Remastered - Soundtrack, Hack 'n' Slash, Iron Brigade, MASSIVE CHALICE, MASSIVE CHALICE Soundtrack, Psychonauts, Psychonauts Original Score, Psychonauts Original Soundtrack, Spacebase DF-9, Stacking

 

关于这款游戏

Hack ‘n’ Slash is a puzzle action game about hacking -- reprogram object properties, hijack global variables, hack creature behavior, and even rewrite the game’s code. The only way to win is not to play...by the rules!

The wizard has mandated that everyone confine themselves to the village, the castle armory has started to forge weapons so powerful that no one but guards are allowed to carry them, and anyone who attempts to find a sprite and demonstrate their bravery would face certain death. The new laws are for your own protection, but you don’t buy it. You’ll show everyone what “brave” means and, if you’re clever, maybe uncover the secret reasons why everything’s gone sideways.

Key Features:


  • Use in-game tools to hack the game while you’re playing it
    Your sword can hack the variables of objects. You find magic artifacts that allow you to tune global variables to your liking. Discover equipment that lets you see the game’s internal debug visualization to uncover things that weren’t meant to be seen.
  • Hack the code
    As you achieve advanced hacking mastery, you’ll be able to dive directly into the game’s assembly in the form of procedurally generated dungeons and modify the live-running code.
  • Make the game yours
    Puzzles have myriad solutions, many of which we haven’t anticipated. As you master the game’s hacking mechanics, you can mold and shape the game in whatever way you desire.
  • Crash it!
    You’re hacking the game for real! You can totally break it. Roll back in time to change the rules so the bugs don’t cause the world to fall apart, whether they’re yours or ours!

系统需求

Windows
Mac OS X
SteamOS + Linux
    最低配置:
    • 操作系统: Windows XP Service Pack 3
    • 处理器: 1.7 GHz Dual Core
    • 内存: 2 GB RAM
    • 图形: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260, ATI Radeon 4870 HD, Intel HD 3000, or equivalent card with at least 512 MB VRAM
    • DirectX 版本: 9.0
    • 存储空间: 需要 3 GB 可用空间
    • 声卡: DirectX Compatible Sound Card
    • 附注事项: Must have OpenGL 3 with GLSL version 1.3
    推荐配置:
    • 操作系统: Windows 7
    • 处理器: Intel Core 2 Duo at 2.2 GHz, AMD Athlon 64 2.2Ghz
    • 内存: 3 GB RAM
    • 图形: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460, AMD Radeon HD 6850
    • DirectX 版本: 11
    • 存储空间: 需要 3 GB 可用空间
    • 声卡: DirectX Compatible Sound Card
    • 附注事项: Must have OpenGL 3 with GLSL version 1.3. Some users may need to disable Steam overlay.
    最低配置:
    • 操作系统: Snow Leopard 10.6.8 or later
    • 处理器: Intel Core Duo
    • 内存: 2 GB RAM
    • 图形: ATI Radeon HD 4850, NVIDIA GeForce GT 120, Intel HD 3000, or equivalent card with at least 512 MB VRAM
    • 存储空间: 需要 3 GB 可用空间
    • 附注事项: Must have OpenGL 3 with GLSL version 1.3
    推荐配置:
    • 操作系统: Lion 10.7.X
    • 处理器: Intel Core i series processor
    • 内存: 4 GB RAM
    • 图形: AMD Radeon HD 6770, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
    • 存储空间: 需要 3 GB 可用空间
    • 声卡: Compatible Sound Card
    • 附注事项: Must have OpenGL 3 with GLSL version 1.3. Some users may need to disable Steam overlay.
    最低配置:
    • 操作系统: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
    • 处理器: 1.7 GHz Dual Core
    • 内存: 2 GB RAM
    • 图形: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260, ATI Radeon 4870 HD, Intel HD 4000, or equivalent card with at least 512 MB VRAM
    • 存储空间: 需要 3 GB 可用空间
    • 附注事项: Must have OpenGL 3 with GLSL version 1.3
    推荐配置:
    • 操作系统: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS or higher
    • 处理器: Intel Core 2 Duo at 2.2 GHz, AMD Athlon 64 2.2Ghz
    • 内存: 3 GB RAM
    • 图形: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460, AMD Radeon HD 6850
    • 存储空间: 需要 3 GB 可用空间
    • 附注事项: Must have OpenGL 3 with GLSL version 1.3. Some users may need to disable Steam overlay.
有价值的用户评测
3 人中有 3 人(100%)觉得这篇评测有价值
8.8 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2015年12月4日
这游戏超赞的,竟然这么多差评。我不服。

这是一个塞尔达风格、代码向的解谜游戏。一开始可以改改对象的属性,后来可以调调游戏速度、改改敌人的路径、甚至是自己的属性,再后来可以修改全局变量,之后甚至可以修改所有遇到的对象的方法(不过是有限度的修改)。最终,甚至把所有的脚本代码都暴露给你。
有趣的是,这个游戏把这一切都包装成了合理的形式。脚本文件夹在游戏中是一个图书馆,一个脚本是一本书。变量和代码在游戏中也会自动转换成宝石和机器这样的形式。
不得不说此游戏确实需要写过一点点代码才能顺利玩下去。但是对编程的要求其实很低的,推荐所有不反感代码的人都可以玩玩看。如果能因此激发出编程的兴趣,想必这个游戏也就物超所值了。
谜题的设计基本上都很不错。尽管你看起来手握这么无敌的修改能力,不多思考的话仍然是无法解决的(很多地方不止一种解决方案)。另外有一两处地方容易卡关,但是冷静一下通常也能解决。
另外游戏中可能会遇到几个小bug,包括进入不了某些地图、读档卡住、人物消失、画面模糊之类。作为一个低级码农,我觉得对于这种神奇的游戏没有bug简直是不可能的。请尝试通用手段(一个不行就试下一个):换地图->读档->重启游戏->读之前的存档

真心不理解为何差评这么多!这是我半年来买的最值的游戏(4 RMB)没有之一!
10/10 would hack again.

P.S.本想汉化一波,结果发现3dm已经搞过了,遂作罢。
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
37 人中有 34 人(92%)觉得这篇评测有价值
6.0 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:1月5日
As a progammer and a lover of puzzle games, I figured that I'd brave the mixed reviews since I fall within the target demographic. Despite that, this game was a disappointment. The puzzles are either uninspired or obscure, the game is liable to crash often, and the dialogue is grating.

Some of the early problems were promising, but simple. "Hacking" objects to modify high-level object properties made for some novel challenges, but there are few enough hackable objects and few enough properties within each that most of these puzzles reduced to "hack problem object, adjust obvious property."

At some point in the game we are given the ability to actually examine and edit objects' code. Unfortunately this also leads to either frustrating or overly simple puzzles. Many times in the game we simply enter an object's code and change it's "isHackable" property to true, then hack the object and change some obvious property. A fine puzzle to solve once, but to use it at several critical points seems repetitive.

I'm not familiar with Lua (the langauge the player manipulates in-game) and figured this game would at least give me a sense of the language. This was not the case. The structure of the in-game code was such that its purpose was often impossible to decipher - loops and conditions were presumably present but all code was displayed in a perfectly linear manner and I emerged even more confused about Lua than when I began.

Most of the late-game programming puzzles offer up the bit of code to be modified pretty easily. Upon entering an object's code you can visit various subclasses and functions, most of which are long and clearly critical to the game's normal function. The game does allow you to visit these blocks of code (though this sometimes crashes the game with longer sections) and does allow you to modify them, but their size and codepenence generally means that no meaningful changes can be made without "crashing the game" (errors created by the player result in the "end of the universe" and you must reload), and puzzles are rarely solved by doing so.

In contrast, other blocks of code have a very different style - short and with clearly labeled variables that pertain to the puzzle at hand. Identifying which blocks the game invites you to modify is pretty easy based only on this clear difference in style, and once you've found the critical function you can often change a simple boolean or integer without really understanding what you're doing, and solving the puzzle.

This is not to say the game is a breeze - many puzzles are not obvious. The challenge comes not from the innovation of the puzzles but by their obscurity. No direction is given to the player in several key sections, and it's often unclear whether you simply don't have the object required to get past a challenge, or if you haven't dig deep enough in the code.

The final puzzle was especially unrewarding. A deep delve into the final boss's code was fun, and I finally mananged to convice the boss to destroy itself. Success! ...or, nope, I'm just stuck in the boss screen with no boss. I reloaded and tried a different tactic, but this one defeated the boss as well as destroyed the universe. Suspecting a bug, I turned to a guide which presented a third, equally viable code tweak which was arbitrarily selected as the "correct" one by the designers and moved the plot forward.

I also was able to accidentally skip a final puzzle by reloading at a particular spot (which I only realized by reading a guide after completing the game), which makes me unsure if this happened at other points in the game.

A final note is the humor: The writers try painfully hard to make witty dialogue but it comes across as juvenile and bizzare. I'm a fan of good humor, high- or low-brow, but this game delivers neither.

I DID finish the game in the hopes that such a novel concept would yield at least a few inspired puzzles or challenges, and admittely a few did come close. Riding the line between puzzle game and programming chalenge, ultimately the game fails as either. To programmers and puzzlers, I advise you to seek fun elsewhere.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
37 人中有 28 人(76%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 4 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
3.6 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2015年12月13日
This is an adventure/puzzle/programming game, NOT an action game of any sort. The puzzles revolve around you manipulating the programming of various objects and npcs. That sounds good, but what you can edit is very limited, at least in the beginning. Other reviews say it opens up a lot later, but is still more limited than you probably desire. Anyway, the game has a lot of quirks and frustrating design choices that typical adventure games have, and those turned me off completely. Examples include:

* Some objects or paths from one map to another are easy to miss. Not getting them means you eventually can't proceed but you won't know why because...
* No objective display to let you know or even hint at what you should be doing
* No map
* Solutions to puzzles are sometimes very obtuse

So as you might guess from the above, I got lost for over an hour, with no idea what to do next. I ended up turning to a guide, and quit soon after.

This is the kind of game where you need to be prepared to walk around every inch of the world looking for what changed since your last world-changing action. And you need to be ready to bash your head against the wall, trying everything you can think of, until you finally solve a puzzle. Lots of people find that fun. I don't. At all.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
17 人中有 14 人(82%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 1 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
5.8 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:1月12日
In the last few years there has been an increase on programming-oriented games, most of which are fun, challenging or even infomative
This one, however, is neither of those things; prone to crashing and with little actual puzzles besides changing a single value in a file, it keeps coming short on everything it`s supposed to do
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
42 人中有 23 人(55%)觉得这篇评测有价值
4.1 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2015年12月19日
I really enjoyed this game at the start. Then at one point, I got stuck because I couldn't understand the text. Apparently I walked past the Glyph Decoder... and to go get it I had to play from a earlier save point... This really put me off the game. If there was something that important, they should'nt have let me past it.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐