2 SIDES, 12 NATIONS, 750 UNITS: THE STRATEGY GAME REFERENCE IS BACK! Richer, more beautiful and more accessible, Wargame AirLand Battle is the sequel to the explosive real-time strategy game Wargame European Escalation! 1985.
使用者評論: 極度好評 (2,833 篇評論)
發售日: 2013 年 05 月 29 日


購買 Wargame: Airland Battle


購買 Wargame Franchise Pack

包含 3 個項目: Wargame: Airland Battle, Wargame: European Escalation, Wargame: Red Dragon



"If your a RTS Lover here is a game for you. It is not for the light hearted this game will test your mental fortitude. Great game if you love RTS's."


“AirLand Battle is a deep, rewarding endeavor worthy of any strategy nut's time”
8,4/10 – http://uk.ign.com/articles/2013/06/05/wargame-airland-battle-review

“One of the year's best”
9,0/10 – http://www.rtsguru.com/game/492/article/5969/WarGame-AirLand-Battle-One-of-the-Years-Best.html



Richer, more beautiful and more accessible, Wargame AirLand Battle is the sequel to the explosive real-time strategy game Wargame European Escalation!

1985. After several months of tension between NATO and the Warsaw Pact, an incident in the North Sea suddenly sets the world on fire, starting an all-out war.
Command the entire military resources of the period, and plunge into the heart of a new dynamic campaign! With the arrival of air forces, select from a phenomenal array of 750 units (including tanks, planes, helicopters, and infantry) to build your army. Engage in spectacular battles with unmatched strategic depth, on huge battlefields as large as 150km², powered by a new graphics engine.

Impressive in solo play, Wargame AirLand Battle is even more engaging online. The game features ultra-complete multiplayer modes, where up to 20 players do battle simultaneously!


Mac OS X
SteamOS + Linux
    • Processor:AMD/INTEL DUAL-CORE 2.5 GHZ
    • Memory:2048 MB RAM
    • DirectX®:9.0
    • Hard Drive:15 GB HD space
    • Other Requirements:Broadband Internet connection
    • OS:MAC OS X 10.6.8
    • Processor:INTEL CORE 2 DUO 2.4 GHZ
    • Memory:2048 MB
    • Graphics:256 MB ATI RADEON HD 4670/NVIDIA GEFORCE GT120/320M OR HIGHER
    • Hard Drive:15 GB HD space
    • Other Requirements:Broadband Internet connection
    • OS:UBUNTU 12.04 LTS/UBUNTU 12.10
    • Processor:AMD/INTEL DUAL-CORE 2.5 GHZ
    • Memory:2048 MB
    • Hard Drive:15 GB HD space
    • Other Requirements:Broadband Internet connection
158 人之中有 125 人(79%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
75.6 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 13 日
When troops run out of ammo they charge with knifes.
When knifes break they fight with bare hands.
When arms are broken you are allowed to leave the field.

When tank runs out of ammo you charge the enemy and ram them.
When tank treads break you pursue on foot.
Only when the tank is on fire may the tankers leave the field.

When plane run out of ammo it rams.
When plane is severly damaged it preforms Hirro-Kari and commits a kamikaze.
Only when wings are gone is when the pilot may leave his plane.

This is the code of honor for all PACT troops.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
41 人之中有 39 人(95%)認為這篇評論值得參考
25.5 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 16 日
Alright, let's get on with the fact that this game is AWESOME!!! This game is almost an exact replica of RUSE, except for a few mechanics that are overall different with the game. Wargame: Airland Battle is a sequel to the huge-hit of a strategy game called Wargame: European Escalation, which sets you on a collision course with the Warsaw Pact, an alliance of communist nations including Russia. You can play as either the PACT or NATO in an epic campaign to blow up your enemies before they destroy you. It has more units, WAY better graphics, and the new addition of jets. Anyway, let's get to the pros and the cons.

- It is easy to run this game on any computer. You can even run this on a laptop with decent graphics.
- There is a HUGE unit variety. Each unit in every faction serves a purpose, and sometimes you will actually lose a battle because you don't have a specific unit.
- There are 12 countries, all spread out through 2 factions.
- There is a decent amount of gamemodes at your disposal.
- The graphics are BEAUTIFUL if you have a computer able to handle ultra-high graphics.
- There is no damage bar or health bar for your units. Instead, there is morale, which can be crushed by artillery and prolonged suppressive fire. And if your units are armored, like the M1A1 Abrams, it will be a tough time to even penetrate it's armor.
- The strategy and tactics in this game are absolutely CRUCIAL to even get far into this game. You need to maintain a stable economy of supplies while at the same time sending more units out to kick some more ♥♥♥.
- The sounds in this game are pretty good. The explosions sound like explosions, and the whistling of artillery shells and tank cannon shells wizzing by is extremely satisfying.
- There is an enormous amount of effort for the units, as they look really good.
- There is a suppressing mechanic, which if you fire artillery or something else at an enemy unit, they will be supressed, meaning they won't be able to move for a short time.
- The best mechanic is probably the fact that once you lose a unit, you can't get it back for the rest of the game, so tactics to minimize your losses and maximize your kills is crucial for survival.
- There is an actual fog of war mechanic, as every unit has a sight range. You will NEED scouts and recon units to scope out enemy units and to know what is happening most of the time.

Cons: (no game is without its defects)
- This game is brutal to new players, as even the AI can catch you off guard if you aren't paying attention.
- The Hud is a huge cluster♥♥♥♥ in large battles, you will be spending precious time trying to find your tank group in the middle of an apparently huge staging area for your allies while your forces get destroyed one by one.
- The fact that there is no way to get back your units after they are destroyed.
- The 'maintaining an economy' factor is more often than not overwhelming for noobs.
- The fact that a group of weaker tanks are almost no match for a stronger tank. Armor is a factor, but eventually the armor has to give, right?

Overall, this is a complex but very fun strategy game. it's like RUSE, but with better graphics and a WAY bigger unit variety. Not to mention the fact that each country has it's own strengths and weaknesses. For instance, America seems to be the most balanced between maneuverability and firepower while being expensive, whereas the Russians are cheap, but pack a big punch. This game is the perfect game if you are a fan of RUSE or any other strategy game like this one.

I will rate this a 9/10. Only missing 10 because of the HUD and some other factors that are in question.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
49 人之中有 43 人(88%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
105.0 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 13 日
Like killing Commies?
Like being a Commie?
Like Freedom?
Like RTS?
Like large scale warfare?
Like Canada?

Get this game.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
6 人之中有 5 人(83%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 2 位使用者認為這則評論很有趣
382.4 記錄時數
張貼於:03 月 24 日
Learned how to say "Please help me, I'm on fire and I blame you, commander" in several European languages.

11/10 would accidentally napalm my own troops again.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
5 人之中有 4 人(80%)認為這篇評論值得參考
162.5 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 26 日
Great RTS with modern military units and equipment. Game is similar to ruse but a lot different. This isnt just your average rts game where you buy units and go head on head with enemies, Doing this with make you lose. It takes a lot of ambushing the enemies and approching them from the front and side. You can have units from foot, ground, and air. The maps are really big. Dont forget your troops can run out of fuel, break engine parts, and run out of ammo. I highly recommend the series of wargame!
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
6 人之中有 4 人(67%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 2 位使用者認為這則評論很有趣
3.4 記錄時數
張貼於:03 月 8 日
Sent 30 tanks, every one of them got annihilated by one apache.

10/10 would do again
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
5 人之中有 3 人(60%)認為這篇評論值得參考
80.3 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 14 日
Great game.....good for multi players with the right people....
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
7 人之中有 4 人(57%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
10.9 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 30 日
I highly reccomend the game, but not the community. War Game seems to have attracted the absolute dregs of the internet to circle jerk about min-max tank strategies and MiG-17 strafing runs
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
33.0 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 28 日
"Wargame: Airland Battle" is not one of it's kind only becouse it now has both - prequel and sequel. But in all other aspects I don't recall game like this. While on first sight it seems to be another Real Time Wargame it has something that makes it different. In ways that matters. It has genuine feel of actuall battlefield, putting weight on planning and executing strategy, right choice of troops, combined arms and maintaining your troops supplied instead of inhuman reflex and micro management. Really big list of available units equipped with things that matters (for example there is a difference between various types of guided missiles) gives players a lot of flexibility while constructing their own "deck". And the looks. Today a bit outdated, still has its appeal. I must confess that I constantly switch between zooms. Looking from far away I have a clear sight of what's going on, with nice icons marking location and troop type. And when looking at close it's hell of a fun to see how your tanks move along the road, escorted by choppers above them...
If I were to give one reason why niot to buy and play "Wargame: Airland Battle" I would say it's becouse you can buy and play "Wargame: Red Dragon".
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
673.1 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 23 日
Infantry stealth sucks.

But it's actually playable.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
9.9 記錄時數
張貼於:01 月 9 日
Listed at $19.99, this Military RTS game might just be the best of its kind. The Wargame series is the best, RTS series out there. Wargame: Airland Battle is the best in the series, may not be as recent as Red Dragon, but still makes Red Dragon look like a game for 3 year olds.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
20 人之中有 10 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
423.8 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 26 日
It's ok.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
4 人之中有 2 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
22.3 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 7 日
my buddy who convinced me to buy this beat me over 100 times at it... one time I beat him he cries and says im cheap...

12/10 because the enjoyment i felt from his tears,, Suck it Manuel and EAT MY FLEET OF HELICOPTERS
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
1.4 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 15 日
I really enjoyed this game, but it takes a whilte to get use to. If you're a slow learner then this game won't be very good for you. The online matchmaking could be better, the campaign could be better too, either I'm stupid or I sat on the campaign map for 20 minutes trying to figure it out. But over all the game is pretty fun when you know what you're doing, if you want a modern military strategy game, either for campaign or Multiplayer against other people then get this.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
47.8 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 15 日
Briliant Game.
Very in depth Warfare simulator, simultaneously complex and simple with a wonderful deck building mechanic that I personally can just spend hours in, and have.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
21.4 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 18 日
well im not gunna lie i've played rts games sincei was a kid and after finally getting a decent pc i've got this. My god its like any rts i have ever played. Despite it being hard whn you first play it as i had no idea what the heck i was doing, after a few hours starting to get the jist.

Pro's: massive maps
4v4 games ( can be with or without ai)
a ♥♥♥♥ ton of vehcles which are all real units with real specs!
several game modes, ( destructin is a favourite)
highlty detailed
each game is completly different so it won't get dull
explosions everywhere!!

the only main one is not having infite units which is good and bad. Good so you don't spam op units bad side is once there dead, they are dead and you may have a few spare.
needs more explosions!

I am still amazed at how this game is its just amazing and mind blowing. If you are wiling to learn how to play it decent then i highly recommend it!!

這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
6 人之中有 3 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
34.5 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 17 日
A must have strategy
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
4 人之中有 2 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
1.1 記錄時數
張貼於:03 月 21 日
this game is vradf poop on a 56 op[ adn has soap in it and then you go boooooooooooooooooooom and your all like ♥♥♥♥ and then the game is bad the n is gouing to come and kile you anfd then you find toe and then O-o weeeee and wosh tut you also get the giant theinm tho you ge t eldcieadceotoaquted then you get hamburger and this game is 1/dang it
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
4 人之中有 2 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
7.6 記錄時數
張貼於:01 月 20 日
detroit simulator
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
145.8 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 23 日
Aswesome game! 10/10!
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣