Catzilla - Advancedバージョン - プレーヤー向きのテスト及びお勧め。 機能:カスタム・テスト、お勧め、アーカイブや実績の履歴を比較及びディスクに記録。 以上のオプションはFREE(無料のバージョン)及びBASIC(基本的なバージョン)にはご利用できません。 テストはグラフィック・カードだけではなく、全てのコンピューターの構成要素を検査します。テストが終わった上で使用者がゲームにおいてのコンピューターの性能評価を表示する検査の証明書を受けます。弊社のソフトはそのコンピューターの性能の向上し方及び置換必要な部品や安い値段で買える店などに関してもお勧めします。
ユーザーレビュー:
Overall:
賛否両論 (70 件のレビュー) - このソフトウェアのユーザーレビュー 70 件中 54% が好評です
リリース日: 2014年2月28日

このアイテムをウィッシュリストへの追加、フォロー、興味なしとチェックするには、サインインしてください。

Catzilla - Advanced を購入する

 

最新の更新 全て表示(4)

4月11日

NEW Catzilla 4K in 2160p and game testing




In connection with the latest trends, Mega Cat returns expanded to test your computer's performance in 4K resolution.
In the latest version, we have drawn conclusions from several years of previous experience and conversations with users. The presentation of test results became more simple, which at the moment are easy to read not only by professionals but also by ordinary computer users.

After the test, user gets not only information in the form of a score, which admittedly, most people do not understand, but also in a graphic form, which immediately shows how strong a computer is, and if can you run a game or if your computer is too weak.








If it turns out that the latest games are too demanding for your PC, there is no problem. The latest Catzilla 4K use more than a million results from its database, to recommend you hardware exchange which is easiest to replace, to significant and cheap raise your computer score.
For example, you can find out that the easiest way to get higher score is GPU replacement. You will know what GPU to buy and what score you will get after replacement.


2 件のコメント 詳細を見る

このソフトウェアについて

Catzilla - Advancedバージョン - プレーヤー向きのテスト及びお勧め。

機能:カスタム・テスト、お勧め、アーカイブや実績の履歴を比較及びディスクに記録。
以上のオプションはFREE(無料のバージョン)及びBASIC(基本的なバージョン)にはご利用できません。
テストはグラフィック・カードだけではなく、全てのコンピューターの構成要素を検査します。テストが終わった上で使用者がゲームにおいてのコンピューターの性能評価を表示する検査の証明書を受けます。弊社のソフトはそのコンピューターの性能の向上し方及び置換必要な部品や安い値段で買える店などに関してもお勧めします。

主な機能


  • お勧めのシステム-ソフト及びハードウェアに対してのお勧め。
    弊社のソフトはコンピューターにおける基礎的な問題を探し、例えば、新しいドライバーをインストールしたり、空きディスク容量を拡大したり、色深度及び解像度を変更したり、GPUやCPUなどをより性能が高いのに置換したりするようなその解決方法を提出します。

  • ゲームのチェック
    ゲームの最低要求がコンピューターの構成要素のそれぞれのテスト実績と比較されています。その結果はあるゲームが検査されたコンピューターにおいて微妙な項目まで見えるようにすらすらと働くかどうかという答えです。コンピューター及びその部品と同じように、ゲームにもその検査の結果を表示する証明書があるおかげで、あるゲームを実行するのにどのように速いコンピューターが必要かと直ぐに確定することができます。

システム要件

    最低:
    • OS: Windows10, Windows 8, Windows 7, Windows Vista
    • プロセッサー: Intel Core2Duo or AMD Athlon II
    • メモリー: 4 GB RAM
    • グラフィック: GeForce 8x00 series or Radeon HD2000 series
    • DirectX: Version 10
    • ストレージ: 500 MB 利用可能
    • サウンドカード: not required
    推奨:
    • OS: Windows10, Windows 8, Windows 7
    • プロセッサー: Intel i5 CPU, AMD FX 6xxx
    • メモリー: 4 GB RAM
    • グラフィック: GeForce 8xxx series or Radeon HD 5xxx series
    • DirectX: Version 11
    • ストレージ: 500 MB 利用可能
    • サウンドカード: not required
Customer reviews
Customer Review system updated! Learn more
Overall:
賛否両論 (70 件のレビュー)
Recently Posted
🔥Kirusha :3
( 記録時間: 6.6 時間 )
投稿日: 5月9日
Product received for free
If u dont love this software, u dont love me.
SharpShot.gif
( 記録時間: 0.7 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年11月28日
Terrible program. You can't link your account to the website as the code does not work. Support does not exist and the website is just broken with links not working. The program does work well for benchmark testing and i cant fault it for this. The recommendations it gives are bad. I strongly recommend another benchmark program.
Puggy04
( 記録時間: 0.7 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年10月13日
Abandonned software not being supported by it's devs anymore. Too bad so many wasted their money on this.
jpbronzo
( 記録時間: 0.6 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年8月1日
It works fine, but I have found that I can't sign up with my facebook, google, or twitter, because none of their links work when clicked on. I don't know if this is only me but it is very frustrating. So unfortunately, I can not recommend this.
mkgutz
( 記録時間: 0.9 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年7月12日
Excellent benchmarking. Typically bench mark with 3dMark Firestrike. Similiar results. Would like to % ranking just n of m ranking.
TooFatToFish
( 記録時間: 6.8 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年6月9日
Unsupported by developers and unstable.
Freyar
( 記録時間: 0.5 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年6月1日
Sadly, it doesn't work as it needs to. Despite having a secondary card slaved to PhysX only, this benchmark seems to only want to use this card for any tests. In order to get a test on my actual card, I have to uninstall/disable my secondary card in the system for the benchmark to ignore it.

The benchmark is short, and while funny to watch, doesn't seem to really stress hardware as much as it should. Sorry to say, but you're better off with 3DMark.
WhiteWulfe
( 記録時間: 0.3 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年5月3日
Given that the product is a benchmarking suite, it does what it does and it doesn't take very long, especially when compared to other popular programs. For the record, the scores you earn in this program aren't necessarily easily translated into the real world.

In essence, it runs several graphic and processor intensive scenes and uses a mathematical formula to come up with individual scores for each scene which then go through another formula to come up with a combined score. This can then be used to compare against other people.

For some, the advanced version is nice because it allows you to post scores directly to your Facebook timeline (I can't tell whether this is worth it or not, but I don't use Facebook that much), or to HWBot (which I think is of greater use alongside the 1080p and 1440p benches that are unlocked). I'd only recommend that someone actually purchase this if they intended to use it on a semi-regular basis.


If you're looking to run it once or twice to be all "OMG, what is this music and screaming cats with laser beams coming out of their eyes, and why is there an anime chick in a skirt bringing in a second one through a giant pill that drops from the heavens"...... Try the demo, as you can get 576p for free, and 720p for free as well if you register on the Catzilla website.
damon.jay.breckheimer
( 記録時間: 26.4 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年4月5日
HWiNFO64 issue makes this useless for me. Until it gets fixed STAY AWAY! It used to be great.
GunSurgeon
( 記録時間: 8.1 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年3月29日
I love the bench mark ! Great companion to have with 3D Mark, but 3D Mark is stil my go to bench mark software.
Totally Harmless
( 記録時間: 6.4 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年3月26日
It's pretty good. Nothing that really sets it aside from others apart from an awesome movie, but nothing that makes it much worse than others. I'd reccomend it if you're looking for a broad spectrum of benchmarks for a graphics card review, or if you're looking for an advanced benchmark besides 3DMARK.
ReBoot
( 記録時間: 2.0 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年2月26日
The demo alone is killer!
surtur
( 記録時間: 19.2 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年2月7日
Love It!!!! no idea why people are complaining
Astori Heichalot
( 記録時間: 0.5 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年1月30日
This software does what it is supposed to do,
It is a benchmarking program, it is supposed to tell you (users) about how ♥♥♥♥♥♥ your PC is and spitting your spec by running the test in a single digit fps.

Only overclockers & benchmarkers that should buy this softwares,
or unaware ordinary people that are willing to be shot by laser beam from a giant cat's eye

Sadly, there is no longer support for this software and it is no longer updated for current technology

if you want a real benchmarking program, I would recommend 3DMark instead
Bazookamoose
( 記録時間: 6.3 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年1月27日
It's a fun Demo video, however it's not able to spcify what card you are using when you have multiple cards. My test results all say I'm usinga 650, when that's my dedicated physx card. I have 2 760's in SLI. I don't know about the recommendations portion or what use that is. Pretty much, if you are looking for a 1440 only test this is one out there... Function and multiple level testing with testmark is much more detailed, worth the money. All in all not bad, but could be more like $6.00 instead of 14.99.
Rowlaz
( 記録時間: 1.1 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年1月17日
Two giant cats shooting lasers out their eyes and nuke slapping a few city blocks. Whats not to love in this benchmark!
PurplePuppet
( 記録時間: 0.2 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年1月3日
Should change its name from Catzilla to Crapzilla, cause that what it is...won`t even start on Win 7 Ult 64, causes pc to freeze/lockup,
I can run all other benchmarks out there, even the latest 3D Mark Firestrike Ultra (4K version), but this software is so bad!!!
Wolf Man Dan
( 記録時間: 0.6 時間 )
投稿日: 2015年1月1日
A lovely benchmarking software that can help you optimise your gameplay.
Owning a gaming laptop, I wanted to max out the settings and see what I could do...
It's a good thing to find out where your weaknesses are, and here you can find them.
WarNorth
( 記録時間: 0.6 時間 )
投稿日: 2014年12月13日
Christof told me to rate this benchmark because it is do
•Goregasm•
( 記録時間: 0.9 時間 )
投稿日: 2014年11月14日
I'm a big catzilla. 10/10
Most Helpful Reviews  In the past 180 days
22 人中 17 人 (77%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
1人がこのレビューが面白いと投票しました
おすすめしません
記録時間: 0.7 時間
投稿日: 2015年11月28日
Terrible program. You can't link your account to the website as the code does not work. Support does not exist and the website is just broken with links not working. The program does work well for benchmark testing and i cant fault it for this. The recommendations it gives are bad. I strongly recommend another benchmark program.
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
Most Helpful Reviews  Overall
25 人中 22 人 (88%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
2 人がこのレビューが面白いと投票しました
おすすめ
記録時間: 0.8 時間
投稿日: 2014年2月28日
ネコジラが町を破壊していくベンチマーク
実績対応で全部解除するには結構なスペックが必要(i7-2600K+GTX680で12段階中10段階)
猫好きなら買い
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
799 人中 738 人 (92%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
2 人がこのレビューが面白いと投票しました
おすすめ
記録時間: 6.5 時間
投稿日: 2014年3月1日
MAJOR UPDATE TO THIS REVIEW! CHANGING FROM NOT RECCOMENDED TO RECCOMENDED.
PLEASE READ THE NEW UPDATE FOR 23/03/2014.

UPDATE 23/03/2014:
Catzilla has apparently listened to the negative feedback and fixed pretty well everything I had an issue with.
They've :
- improved their description to show exactly what you're getting
- upgraded what you actually get for your $15
- changed their product base from a subscription service to one-time purchase
- updated the software to fix bugs

I can now say that I'm happy that I spent $15 on a piece of good benchmarking software.

Now you get pretty much everything you could ask for from this product for $15. A consistent overall benchmark that seems to allow a good comparison between machines. Some nice features like being able to save all test scores to disk for later use, or being able to upload all your test scores to an online profile where you can compare against other users on the leaderboards.

I will leave the old version of the review below, but please note that the old review no longer reflects anything of the new updated version.






EVERYTHING UNDER THIS LINE IS OLD AND NO LONGER APPLIES TO THIS PRODUCT.
I AM ONLY KEEPING IT HERE AS A BIT OF HISTORY TO MAKE OLDER COMMENTS MAKE SENSE.

I wish I had realized that this is basically the "free" version of Catzilla (mentioned nowhere in the description) that you can download from their website at no charge. In order to actually get any real features, you have to sign up for a damn subscription (again mentioned nowhere in the description).

UPDATE: I didn't notice before but as another reviewer pointed out, it does allow you to run all the tests (vs just up to 720p like the free version), but that's the only difference between this and the free version that I've been able to see so far.
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
571 人中 528 人 (92%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
1人がこのレビューが面白いと投票しました
おすすめ
記録時間: 2.5 時間
投稿日: 2014年3月1日
When this game first came out it was an appaling mess. The website didn't work with the software, and the subscription model didn't line up with the Steam release.

This has all since changed. Things now work (although they aren't exactly streamlined). But the software does now do what it is intended to do.

It's a benchmark, designed for people who want to test what their system is capable of. And it does exactly that, runs a graphically intensive scenario and delivers a score on how well the system performs.

And this version now lets you save that data online, and the developers are engaging the community in improving things.

To that end I'm changing my review to positive, there is no reason for it to be negative now.
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
4 人中 3 人 (75%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
1人がこのレビューが面白いと投票しました
おすすめ
記録時間: 1.9 時間
投稿日: 2014年8月7日
ベンチとるならこれっきゃないっしょ!!!
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
340 人中 311 人 (91%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
9 人がこのレビューが面白いと投票しました
おすすめしません
記録時間: 21.6 時間
投稿日: 2014年9月27日
I've built rigs for the 25 years since I was 12. They're usually very high end rigs, where phenomenal performance and reliability are vital.

My tool-set changes and expands with the landscape. On Windows, some of my favorite utilities remain the following, offered for informative purposes:

+ SpeedFan
+ CPU-Z
+ GPU-Z
+ memtest
+ RealTemp
+ OCCT

These are robust and free. They focus on hardware monitoring, testing, benchmarking, and burn-in. I prefer pegging-out my CPU, RAM, GPU, and PSU for at least 24h before any overclocking or tweaking. Once I'm happy with a configuration, I then burn-in for as many days as patience allows. If something's going to die, I want to know while I can easily RMA it.

Modern GPU manufacturers also distribute good utilities with their hardware.

----
Utilities like Catzilla and 3DMARK (an established alternative I'll discuss alongside Catzilla) provide benchmarks geared toward replicating possible realistic gaming usage rather than stressing and killing your system.

Catzilla performs a similar set of complex graphical scene tests as others in this field and provides you an overall score with a breakdown of test elements at the end and an option to submit to an online database for comparison to the wider testing population.

It also seems to use the same score calculations. The numbers come in similar to tests on other suites and at the same "better than 90%" placement that other suites give this 2.5yr old system.

Core functionality, therefore, seems on-par with competitors.

It is everything wrapped around that core which erodes my interest.

----
Launching Catzilla hung my system and reduced the GUI to low-memory mode for the two minute load time. Competing products launch instantly.

Once launched, the first thing I noticed was that they used resolution terminology that put me off, because it comes across as inexperienced. They provide only the vertical number, followed by a "p".

It may seem pedantic, but when referencing display resolutions in the world of PCs, you provide both horizontal and vertical measurement (1920x1200). We do this, because there are many aspect ratios (5:4, 4:3, 16:9, 16:10, 21:9). Providing a single number omits vital info that can impact calculations like estimated performance or configuration.

You can't assume 1080 vertical means anything, because horizontal could be 1920 at 16:9, but 2560 at 21:9. You can't assume 2560 horizontal means anything, because at 16:9 vertical would be 1440, but 1600 at 16:10.

This terminology is acceptable for TVs, because they're standardized at 16:9. While prevalence of 16:9 TVs made it common with computers (manufacturers would rather produce one ratio than reconfigure plants for multiple), you can't count in this being the case.

We also don't add p to the resolution. It stands for progressive scan (as opposed to interlaced), which every monitor inherently is, so there's no point going out of our way to redundantly state this.

This is accepted in TVs, because some TVs only do interlaced at certain resolutions and some content is only progressive or interlaced and some hardware (like last gen consoles) only deliver an interlaced signal, in some cases.

I can accept someone coming from the console world, with little PC experience, or simply caught up in the habit of using TV-specific terminology may discuss resolutions in this way, but it leaves me with a negative impression from a professional software developer putting out PC software to test PC displays for PC rigs.

3DMARK and other suites give full resolution detail when referenced and uses accurate terminology.


----
The second negative impression came with trying to customize a test for my system. The default tests run at 576 (oops, "576p"!), 720, 1080, and 1440. All 16:9 ratios. I have a 16:10 display and I want a benchmark that is representative of what I'm going to have when I'm gaming at 16:10 at a native resolution.

Unfortunately, you can't. Even "custom" configuration does not allow you to choose anything but those four resolutions. All you can customize are options like multi-threading. A developer confirms in their forums that there is no way to customize resolution and this will never change.

Presumably, this is to standardize certain parameters for comparison of your benchmark against others in the database. Fine. I still want the option to perform my own benchmark under my own conditions and parameters so that I can compare my system against itself after performance tuning. These four resolutions make for a constrained testing environment.

3DMARK and other suites allow full configuration of these options and even uploading them to their database for comparisons.

----
I was disappointed that the touted Hardware recommendation feature/tab never worked. It had zero results and kept saying that I needed to run a full test. This was supposed to be a feature which links you to advised hardware upgrades.


----
Another problem you will encounter is navigating their site. A dark and "edgy" interface which looks more at home as the official Call of Duty site. It isn't enjoyable to use. In fact, it can be confusing.

One button pulls up a set of information, but it seems broken, until you realize the data has been displayed a couple screens downward, without any evident notification.

Also, one expects the "compare to other users" button to match your results against the database, until much frustration ultimately reveals it only compares you against one user that you must provide a name for. Comparison against the whole population requires going back to the application and selecting "show all" under the Top 10 users list, which launches your browser and takes you to the database.


----
Worse, you have to register an account and link it to your application. An overly complex process involving multiple long codes, contradictory sets of instructions, and numerous failed attempts. I ultimately had to rely on a user in the forums who found another guy's steps listed somewhere. Even these did not help; but they guided me in the right direction. This should be a simple matter of "application gives me a code, I go to website and enter code on my profile". Some parts of the process even take you to dead URLs with error messages.

My final complaint is that when you exit the program, Steam thinks it is still running. I am unable to identify this application running in the process table, but Steam will not close, because of it. You can not launch Catzilla again, either, until you reboot your computer.


----
Ultimately, Catzilla is serviceable.

It has received some press in the last year, but it's usually around how quirky the superfluous test video is. Dismissing that; focusing on what is actually provided, it does what other packages do, but in a less polished way with fewer customization options.

I still prefer 3DMARK, which I mention in this review because of its popularity, my familiarity, and its availability on Steam. While $10 USD more, it's more robust, less glitchy, has a pleasing interface, allows more customization and control, and has an established history and reputation. It is also frequently updated and offers a wider variety of specialized tests for everything from a tablet, notebook, and laptop to an extreme gaming rig.

Even better, wait until 3DMARK is on sale. I've seen it 90% off ($2.50) in the last week of 2013. While waiting for a sale, use the free version (or free version of another suite).

But keep an eye on Catzilla. I love competition and hope they continue to refine this. I hope it evolves into a robust utility giving competitors a run for their money. I just don't see the current iteration being part of my tool-set at the current price.
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
290 人中 259 人 (89%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
2 人がこのレビューが面白いと投票しました
おすすめしません
記録時間: 1.0 時間
投稿日: 2014年3月1日
NOTICE: This review was written THE DAY OF CATZILLA'S LAUNCH and does not reflect the most recent updates that have been implemented.

Wow do I regret buying this. The Steam version of this application doesn't seem to line up with any of the paid versions you can get through AllBenchmark. It doesn't seem to want to play ball with their online score recording at all. It wont save historic scores, you can't upload scores to your website, you can't push your scores to facebook, you can't even save your score and go back to it later. Once you close the application the scores get wiped. And the syndicated sign-on part of things is just horrible. The amount of times I've tried to log into their website using Facebook sign on and the browser just ends up in a redirect loop. It's a horrible experience. I regret buying this, I want my money back, steer clear...
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
874 人中 615 人 (70%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
おすすめしません
記録時間: 0.6 時間
投稿日: 2014年2月28日
Worthless sorry gamers .i got the impression this was to look at my system and tell me where my week spots was and make sugestion to up date my system .when i finnshed with there scan it would not tell me about my hardware with out paying more for a update . was a good system but was misledding . im an old man that just likes to play games !!!! and with no way to trouble shoot why games wont start or crashes out any more seems like they walk away from you after you buy there games.----sorry im not a geek just a gamer who likes to play and have fun-- smartbombbradie if theres a way i can give you this i will just tell me how ? and you might be able to tell every one about it . thank you guys from the weedcutter
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
39 人中 36 人 (92%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
1人がこのレビューが面白いと投票しました
おすすめしません
記録時間: 0.5 時間
投稿日: 2015年6月1日
Sadly, it doesn't work as it needs to. Despite having a secondary card slaved to PhysX only, this benchmark seems to only want to use this card for any tests. In order to get a test on my actual card, I have to uninstall/disable my secondary card in the system for the benchmark to ignore it.

The benchmark is short, and while funny to watch, doesn't seem to really stress hardware as much as it should. Sorry to say, but you're better off with 3DMark.
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
61 人中 48 人 (79%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
おすすめしません
記録時間: 18.9 時間
投稿日: 2014年3月2日
Skip this and get 3DMark for proper benchmark testing of your rig.
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
56 人中 44 人 (79%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
2 人がこのレビューが面白いと投票しました
おすすめ
記録時間: 0.3 時間
投稿日: 2014年3月3日
Updated: now I can clear see I have advanced version for my 15 bucks.
Such a shame with marketing start-up on the steam platform.


LOL

This is the first time I paid for FREE software!

ROFL

Not sure If I can get my money back...

Read comments guys before make decision to buy something on steam!
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
34 人中 28 人 (82%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
おすすめ
記録時間: 13.4 時間
投稿日: 2014年3月3日
EDIT!

The catzilla team heard our pleas and complaints. its a whole lot better giving us the advanced version. Have to do it from their website but still, much better. tests just as good as Future Mark. The recommendations it makes a extremely valuable in creating a better system. All in all, they made it worth my money ^^
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
37 人中 24 人 (65%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
1人がこのレビューが面白いと投票しました
おすすめしません
記録時間: 1.7 時間
投稿日: 2014年3月3日
crashes constantly on my laptop half way through the test the sceen on my laptop goes blank
please fix
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
10 人中 9 人 (90%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
おすすめしません
記録時間: 6.3 時間
投稿日: 2015年1月27日
It's a fun Demo video, however it's not able to spcify what card you are using when you have multiple cards. My test results all say I'm usinga 650, when that's my dedicated physx card. I have 2 760's in SLI. I don't know about the recommendations portion or what use that is. Pretty much, if you are looking for a 1440 only test this is one out there... Function and multiple level testing with testmark is much more detailed, worth the money. All in all not bad, but could be more like $6.00 instead of 14.99.
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
15 人中 11 人 (73%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
おすすめ
記録時間: 4.3 時間
投稿日: 2014年3月17日
This works fine and IS THE ADVANCED Version. All you have to do is after running a benchmanrk go onto the results tab of catzilla and click the Submit Results Button. It will give you a code then before atcually submitting the results, copy that into a txt editor or run, then goto the catzilla website to http://www.catzilla.com/profil/userdetails after loging in and add the code you just wrote down to the "Invite or Steam Code" Box, Click update and Boom... Advanced version :D
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
19 人中 12 人 (63%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
1人がこのレビューが面白いと投票しました
おすすめ
記録時間: 7.8 時間
投稿日: 2014年3月9日
It's working fine for me. Works the same as the non-Steam version. Just set a new laptop world record for the 1440p.

Catzilla 1440p - 10998 - Results Detail

Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/viG7SJ6.jpg
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
25 人中 15 人 (60%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
おすすめ
記録時間: 7.2 時間
投稿日: 2014年3月5日
If you like testing and benchmarking you PC, like any hard core nerd..you will want this.
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
3 人中 3 人 (100%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
1人がこのレビューが面白いと投票しました
おすすめしません
記録時間: 6.8 時間
投稿日: 2015年6月9日
Unsupported by developers and unstable.
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
7 人中 5 人 (71%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
おすすめしません
記録時間: 0.7 時間
投稿日: 2015年10月13日
Abandonned software not being supported by it's devs anymore. Too bad so many wasted their money on this.
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い
14 人中 8 人 (57%) がこのレビューが参考になったと投票しました
おすすめ
記録時間: 8.7 時間
投稿日: 2014年3月10日
I Do Not recommend this software. I bought it. Look at the Software Details (in the program's "About"). Does this tell you which version you are getting? Forgive me if i'm blind but i don't see it. Apparently I bought the free version thru Steam for $11.99...... Not sure, might've been the Basic version which is not much better & is $3.99 on their website... Should be the Advanced version which is priced at $14.99 on the program's website.. I'm sorry Steam.. But What gives? I will remove this post right away If iI got something wrong..

c0AX

EDIT: Well, I'm only recommending it because I was wrong about most of those comments but the program was & still is kind of hard to get to the state where it fully works as the Advanced version.

http://www.catzilla.com/catzilla-steam-profile

If you fully watch & follow that video, you will get to the Advanced version. One snag i hit was after entering the Invite code, it still didn't give me the Advanced or Connect Code until i logged out & back in to the web site. That's another thing, the vid shows an Advanced code, but I got a "Connect" code that worked...

I was a bit confused about why my 1440p test was still greyed out, but i finally read a little bit about 1440p & quickly realized it's cause my monitor won't support it. 1080p 22" Gateway LCD. Pretty sure i'm right about that..

I do like this program now & it's a good little way to check your machine farily quickly if you make some settings adjustments or overclocking, new hardware etc.

c0AX
このレビューは参考になりましたか? はい いいえ 面白い