Building on Supreme Ruler 2010 and 2020, BattleGoat Studios invites you to relive the tension and uncertainty of the Cold War. As the 1950’s approach, the Korean War looms, the Arms Race intensifies, the Berlin Crisis leads to the formation of NATO, and the world anticipates a new World War.
用户评测:
总体:
多半好评 (146 篇评测) - 146 篇用户的游戏评测中有 71% 为好评。
发行日期: 2011年7月29日

想要将这件物品添加至您的愿望单、关注它或标记为不感兴趣,请先登录

购买 Supreme Ruler: Cold War

 

Supreme Ruler 1936 Early Access

BattleGoat Studios is excited to announce that the newest release in the Supreme Ruler series is now available under Steam Early Access Beta... Be sure to check out Supreme Ruler 1936 on Steam: http://store.steampowered.com/app/244410/

关于这款游戏

Building on Supreme Ruler 2010 and 2020, BattleGoat Studios invites you to relive the tension and uncertainty of the Cold War. As the 1950’s approach, the Korean War looms, the Arms Race intensifies, the Berlin Crisis leads to the formation of NATO, and the world anticipates a new World War.
As leader of the United States or the Soviet Union, you must make the correct Economic, Diplomatic, Domestic and Military decisions to successfully navigate your country through this dangerous historical era and increase your nation’s Sphere of Influence on the world stage.

Key Features:

  • Play as the United States or Soviet Union in Campaign Mode
  • Control any Nation in Post-World War II Era in Sandbox Mode
  • Use Diplomacy, Trade and Espionage to influence the policies of other nations
  • Research new Technologies to give your nation an edge
  • Grow and Modernize your Economy
  • Control Military production and deployment, or let your Ministers take care of the details
  • And when Diplomacy Fails… Sophisticated Real-Time Strategic and Tactical Control of your Military Forces!
  • Enhanced Graphics and Sound including New 3D Terrain
  • Experience the redesigned GUI with improved On-Map feedback and streamlined controls

系统需求

    • OS: Windows XP/Vista/Windows 7
    • Processor: Dual Core or greater Recommended
    • Memory: 1 GB RAM
    • Hard Disk Space: 1 GB Hard Drive Free
    • Video Card: Direct-X 9.0 Graphics with at least 32MB
    • DirectX®: 9.0
    • Sound: Direct-X Compatible Sound
    • Additional: 3-button mouse, keyboard and speakers. Up to 16 players in Multiplayer over LAN or Internet
消费者评测
Customer Review system updated! Learn more
总体:
多半好评 (146 篇评测)
最近发布
U.S.S.R
( 15.2 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:5月20日
Good game But crashes a lot but worth 15 euro
Helpful? 欢乐
ADOLF GABEN
( 5.5 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:5月4日
Super jeux de strategie un des meilleur auquel j'ai jouer vraiment il très bien
Helpful? 欢乐
Kermit the Gangster
( 15.6 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:2月23日
>Plays as Israel
>Becomes a Warmonger
>Conquers Jordan, Syria, UAE, Pakistan, Turkey
























>And palestine

10/10 would palestine again
Helpful? 欢乐
Spinata
( 3.5 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:2月3日
Completely incomprehensible gameplay, without any proper tutorial makes this game pointless without spending alot of time trying to figure out how it works yourself or even with guides. Even when you uselessly grind through the steep learning curve you will be rewarded with a mediocre game at best, that other franchises have overshadowed and those atleast require alot less steep a learning curve. Overall not worth the bother to start with.
Helpful? 欢乐
Besbin
( 2.4 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:1月27日
Very unintuitive UI. Everything is too small to read and scrammed together into unregcorgnizable shapes. AI cheat a lot instead of genuiancely smart.
Helpful? 欢乐
Kong Il Sung(孔)
( 106.5 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:2015年12月11日
North Korea won the Korean War then invaded Thailand. Historically Accurate 10/10
Helpful? 欢乐
pokemon525
( 73.5 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:2015年12月1日
A really good RTS that has incredible historical accuracy. To anyone who finds world politics and military strategy interesting this game is by far the best choice even more so than the civilization series based on the sole fact that it functions like the real world more realistically.
Helpful? 欢乐
Dad
( 40.0 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:2015年12月1日
My first title in the supreme war games, i hope they are as good as this one! A little warning though, all of the wars are scripted. Either than that i reccomend this game.
Helpful? 欢乐
peterdawson1980
( 0.4 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:2015年10月16日
Didnt understand how to play.
Helpful? 欢乐
scurge77
( 65.1 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:2015年10月13日
i find it funny that people hate playing as The United States.
Helpful? 欢乐
dennizenx
( 154.8 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:2015年10月13日
So, it takes a while to get accustomed to the mechanics as is par for paradox titles, but I have to say that battlegoat did a fine job with this massive title. These paradox games are so appealing to me because they double as a history lesson; if you aren't playing them with another window open to wikipedia - and youtube, you're doing it wrong ! :P

There are some menus and info that is impossible or difficult to discern and so far I have spent most of my time learning the game rather than playing it, also I've mostly confined myself to sanbox mode so cannot comment on the 'missions' it might have, but I do look forward to playing them out in the future too.

All in all this game is captivating if you enjoy other paradox titles, it is an excellent game to run, for example, after playing Hearts of Iron III. It's not perfect, but it's good. I got this on sale for less than $5 and I feel like I ripped the publisher off. Thanks steam !!! ;D

(( people who enjoy these but feel combat is weak can suppliment with playing WoWs or WoWp or Company of Heros, etc to get themselves onto the front lines and take a break from the overlording, long-term aspects of the period ;))

Take the time to learn about other nations history, pay attention to your economy (or hand it off to a minister and hold onto your butts) ! This sheeit is closer to edu-tainment, if you dig

8.75/10
Helpful? 欢乐
Marlborough
( 1.2 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:2015年9月21日
I just don't see the point. Complete chaos with human player as bystander.
Helpful? 欢乐
Ejikollon
( 21.0 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:2015年8月26日
Terrible grand strategy. It was good when it's all I knew, but there are MUCH better ones out there; namely ones developed by Paradox (not published).
Helpful? 欢乐
The not so Grand MC Stud
( 0.8 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:2015年8月26日
Clicked on Multiplayer,Game crashed.
Clicked on manual,game crashed.
Went to war on Poland.Won
Helpful? 欢乐
最有价值的评测  在过去的 180 天内
4 人中有 3 人(75%)觉得这篇评测有价值
不推荐
3.5 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2月3日
Completely incomprehensible gameplay, without any proper tutorial makes this game pointless without spending alot of time trying to figure out how it works yourself or even with guides. Even when you uselessly grind through the steep learning curve you will be rewarded with a mediocre game at best, that other franchises have overshadowed and those atleast require alot less steep a learning curve. Overall not worth the bother to start with.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
最有价值的评测  总体
14 人中有 13 人(93%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 3 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
不推荐
1.5 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2013年6月21日
千 万 别 买
我是认真的
基本上就是战略版血狮
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
235 人中有 194 人(83%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 254 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
6.1 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2015年3月9日
Korean war:North Korea wins.
Vietnam war:South Vietnam wins.
Brazil took over South America.
USA became Communist state.
Canada became Communist state.
France became Communist state.
Russia became Capitalist state.
Ukraine became Capitalist state.
Belarus became Capitalist state.
Yugoslavia became Capitalist state.
South Africa won the space race.
10/10 best game
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
62 人中有 56 人(90%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 3 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
不推荐
34.9 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2015年4月2日
This game is hands down the best game in the Supreme Ruler series along with 2020... but it is still kind of bad.

First off, everything that happens is completely historically railroaded. No, I am not talking about who wins what, but more, all the wars are scripted (at least, I have yet to see a non-scripted war). For example, East and West Germany could be in an arms race for so long, with tons of British and USA troops in the West, and Soviets in the East. But what happens? Nothing. They are extremely hostile but nope, no war. It may seem logical, but it gets very boring. Especially knowing the AI will never intervene, and there cannot be a WW3. It makes the spheres system useless.

Also, a WW3 is nearly IMPOSSIBLE, or maybe it is impossible. One worry about the Korean and Vietnam wars in real life was that the wars would drag the Warsaw Pact into all out war with NATO. However, when the Korean war starts, the USA says "lel ♥♥♥♥ you guys" and sits and watches South Korea get steamrolled. Ouch. And then there is Vietnam. The North starts by making large gains on French Indochina, but the French AI sends units by the hundreds over to Vietnam from Europe, and starts steamrolling through the Northern rebels. Now with its ideological enemy creeping towards its borders, China does.... nothing. Units can engage without being at war, and China usually has access through North Vietnam, but they do nothing. In fact, they don't even supply the Vietnamese with weapons, fuel... ANYTHING! They just sit and watch the Capitalists win.

And however the AI in this game is likely the best out of any Supreme Ruler hands down, it just doesn't work properly. For example, say you're USA, and you're trying to get Spain to join NATO. Well, they may have super friendly relations, but they're not even under your influence at ALL. In real life, the USA would supply countries with weaponry, and offer protection, and same with the USSR, but in this game you must keep pouring billions into the AI's treasury before they'll begin accepting deals. And once they do start accepting deals as simple as free trade, you need to offer them ALL the diplomatic treaties before they even start to like you. Then, once you are allied with them, only then do they start to slowly go into your sphere. (Unless you are the AI, with their diplomatic voodoo) But this makes no sense, right? I mean, playing as the USA, you end up allied to 40 different nations just because you wanted them in your influence, meanwhile, the rest of NATO aren't allied with eachother at all. Same thing goes for the Warsaw Pact. It is simply just nonsense.

And then there is the economy... oh god. The ways to make money in this game are the most gamey and unrealistic ways to make money ever. And the only nations that don't need ultra gamey and exploitive actions to make money are : USA, USSR, China, UK, India, and I think that is it. It is quite dumb that these nations always have their pockets filled with money whilst other nations fill up with uncontrollable amounts of debt. Making money shouldn't rely on being one of few lucky nations who never run out of money or mass producing one resource. In Victoria 2, if you focus all your production, on, let's say, machine parts, it may end very poorly. The massive amounts of machine parts you produce may cause them to become nearly worthless, and your factories may hardly scrape by, or a massive economic collapse in the British Empire may lose one of the biggest buyers of your machine parts and your factories will go bankrupt and close. It really immerses you in the economics of the game. In this game, you feel completely disconnected with the economics as all you need to do is spam produce one resource and you're set with tons of cash. It's really dissapointing and boring.

PROS
-Decent interface
-Very nice cold war map
-Nations being released worldwide
-Wars are fun
-Nuclear wars are more fun
-Small border clashes may sometimes occur between hostile nations

CONS
-No feeling of competiton between the USSR and USA
-AI does not intervene in wars such as Korea or Vietnam, making them extremely predictable and boring
-Sphere system does nothing but make nations hate eachother
-"Flashpoint tension" system doesn't do anything, as the AI seems incapable of declaring a non-scripted war
-Economy is extremely gamey, uninteresting, and unrealistic
-Diplomacy AI is horrendous
-Advisors that will start making changes to your nation that you don't want and may not realize
-World War 3 is impossible in the first place, which takes most of the fun out of the game (if it is not, correct me)
-After everything, this is still a game about world conquest, which is not why I bought this
-Same 3 minute soundtrack, looping over, and over, and over, and over and over.....


If I had to score this, I would give it a 6/10. It is a kinda fun game, but many of the issues in it make the game dull and uninteresting at times. I really did expect more from a game with Paradox Interactive as the publisher, and knowing their policy of publishing a game, it really seems like Paradox swept this one under the rug. At this price of $11 it is alright to buy, but if you haven't already, buy Victoria 2 instead.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
58 人中有 50 人(86%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 4 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
24.1 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2013年12月6日
Cold War takes nearly every element from 2020 and improves it ten fold. The graphics are still somewhat primitive but improved greatly and it almost has a charm to it. The diplomatic elements are still some of the best in strategy games but still lacks some features that could make it the best. Military wise its fun and easy to figure out and the new Merchant marine makes it ten times easier to move troops globally and invade island nations. The economic part of the game is time consuming but makes you think about what you need to make it work well.
The interface for managing everything is organised but can be confusing with some elements hidden behind too many other interfaces making it a maze to figure something simple out.
The Cold War campaign is well organised with the Atomic and Space races and the many conflicts and problems are there that were present in the 1950s,60s,70s and 80s.
The Sandbox mode is also still fun to play and a healthy mod scene makes it enjoyable to try different modes and scenarios.

Overall this game is definatly worth your time and money if you into this genre.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
54 人中有 41 人(76%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 4 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
不推荐
7.0 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2015年7月21日
I thought this game would be up to par with Paradox's other grand strategy games, such as Hearts of Iron, Crusader Kings, and Europa Universalis. However while Paradox did publish this game, they did not develop it, and whoever did is nowhere near as good as them at it.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
36 人中有 30 人(83%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 1 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
43.8 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2013年12月10日
This game is very complex, and it takes a lot to get into it. It's a good game, but hard to recommend unless you really enjoy stratagy games. My intrest in the cold war was really all that kept me playing past the 5 hour mark, but now I'm glad that I stuck with it. It's not a game that I play often, but overall, I do enjoy the game, and it was worth the $30 or so dollars I paid for it.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
42 人中有 32 人(76%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 1 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
363.5 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年1月29日
One of my top 5 games of all times. For people who value Gameplay and Logistics over Graphics then this is the game for you.
A must have for all true strategists.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
23 人中有 20 人(87%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 2 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
3.3 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年12月17日
Ricks Review:

Summary:

Gameplay: 8/10 - Game revolves around Conflict and Wars, there is little indepth analysis of how the wars start, end etc. There is barely any form of politics or depth to the scenarios. I do agree that the wars are fun and awesome, but I wish there was a way for the wars to matter except for resources.

Politics: 3/10 - The only form of politics available is choosing whether you're Liberal, Neutral or Conservative, which barely matters in game (that I've noticed). In my opinion and experience, this is all the politics the game provides, yes you debate the economy and build stuff, but that is pointless if you cannot change how they work or emphasise your opinion on it.

Diplomacy: 5/10 - There is a obvious diplomacy in the game where you can negotiate treaties with other countries (alliances, free trade etc.) or buy units, designs, technology or resources from them. However it feels bland and near pointless to negotiate an alliance with other nations if they aren't going to help you (yes an unjustified war should not be supported)

Economy: 7/10 - The money side of the economy is decent, trading resources, collecting taxes, DONE. But the building structures side of the economy (mines, labs etc.) makes your country feel too socialist for many players to accept. It would be a nice feature if your citizens (depending on the economy and other issues) would setup their own businesses, buildings etc. like mines or power plants which have a small toll onto the nations economy compared to state construction. I am not debating the rights and wrongs of a pure socialist society, but there needs to be an acceptance for capitalists or businesses to setup like in many countries today, and would give a reason for corporate taxes to accept.

Audio: 8/10 - Good music and sounds which fit each need.

Story: 2/10 - Basic, generic World War 3 scenario where the worlds resources start becoming few and country paranoia and xenophobia start turning into armed conflicts across the globe. But it is still very basic and generic, yet acceptable for a strategy-simulation.

Multiplayer: N/A - Never tried the multiplayer as no one will play it with me :'(. So I cannot comment on its performance, capaibilities or how well it does.

UI: 7/10 - Blocky and ugly for such an advanced and modern game, yet it provides the necessaries for it to work.

Please Note:

Good Conflict simulator - Not a political simulator

Generic story which is worth no looking at

Very indepth view of a socialist paradise
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
41 人中有 30 人(73%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 32 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
8.8 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2015年1月25日
I sold Nuclear Weapons to Syria and instigated an encounter bewteen Israel and Nigeria, which resulted in a Nuclear Holocaust.

10/10
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
35 人中有 26 人(74%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 1 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
104.9 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年5月17日
This game is amazingly addictive and I actually prefer it over Civilization III, Civilization IV and Civilization V! You won't regret it! After playing this game for the very first time, I did think it was too hard and boring but now that I'm into it? It's seriously worth the price; however, do not buy this game if you do not like REAL TIME STRATEGY on a GLOBAL LEVEL!
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
26 人中有 19 人(73%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 1 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
71.2 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年2月27日
While the game may be hard to play in the begining, it gets fun to play after awhile. You get to rewrite history in the game. In the end, its very fun to play.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
33 人中有 22 人(67%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 1 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
不推荐
75.9 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2013年12月28日
The A.I is incredibly stupid, diplomacy is useless with a stupid A.I. The game runs very slowly even if your system exceeds the requirements and will start to stutter and lags as the A.I build increasing number of units. The game is very buggy and is not very streamlined. The idea looks good on paper and this game has a lot of potential. The game feels like it's still in beta stage. You will spend most of your time being frustrated at all the bugs and the stuttering plus the stupid A.I.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
24 人中有 17 人(71%)觉得这篇评测有价值
不推荐
4.4 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2015年4月8日
Three or four "different" games in a row from this developer and all the releases seem the same along with the same old bugs.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
79 人中有 46 人(58%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 1 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
不推荐
148.7 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2013年12月11日
I've sunk 140 hours in this game and let me tell you it's painfully slow to progress, It's a game you play in the background while playing a more involving game. Originally three times the price when it first came out, it's ambitious but fails to deliver, with parts of the unser interface missing, no tutorial and AI that makes no sense and does the same things every time I played through. The game focuses on the military, but even that is buggy. There isn't much in terms of a soundtrack, with me hearing the same 3 minute track of music looped throughout the game. More of a frustrating struggle than a challenging strategy game.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
42 人中有 26 人(62%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 13 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
32.5 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年5月12日
10/10

very cold
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
31 人中有 20 人(65%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 2 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
57.0 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年7月10日
wow this game is good ive only played 6 hours but this game is amazing you basically make the cold war as inacurate as possible its an extremely fun game 9.5/10
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
18 人中有 13 人(72%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 9 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
12.8 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2015年2月19日
One of those games were you can sit down and take over the world 11/10
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
12 人中有 9 人(75%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 3 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
243.8 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年9月17日
let me tell you something about this, my computer ain't that good, but it runs. So i start playing the game, the first thing i notice is that it doesn't have a tutorial, so i'm stuck trying figure this game out. everytime i tell a unit to go somewhere into enemy territory, the ministers tells them to go somewhere else they there freaking right out of formation into territory, making supplies a ♥♥♥♥♥. so i rcommend this game to people who has a met the maximum requirements and has alot of time on there hands.

Little sidenote, this game is soo slow pace i played the game for a straight 8 hours, and i only got 2 years in ...... yeah.

but overall, it still a damn good game
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
14 人中有 10 人(71%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 1 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
2.1 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年3月10日
This is an excellent Grand Strategy game for history enthusiasts and others. The game's worth exceeds its asking price price of only $9.99 (at the time of writing this review), and is refreshing strategy game since most war games generally skip over the Cold War era. Another plus about this game is that it can run on almost any computer that you would have today because it does not have these amazing, hyper-realistic, 3D graphics that everybody seems to need in 2014. If you are looking for a new Grand Strategy game to play, don't want to spend too much, or just are sick of the World War II, Modern, and want a recent-alternate-history game, this is the one for you!
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐