《Rag Doll Kung Fu》有各類單人與多人遊戲,可上線也可使用多滑鼠,這提供給玩家近年來最有創意、最獨特的遊戲體驗。 此外,在遊戲回合間,還有經典功夫攝影風格的過場動畫,描述年青功夫高手如何過關展將。
使用者評論: 褒貶不一 (31 篇評論)
發售日: 2005 年 10 月 12 日
使用者對此產品下的熱門標籤:

登入好來將此遊戲加入您的願望清單或是標記為無興趣

購買 Rag Doll Kung Fu

 

關於此遊戲

《Rag Doll Kung Fu》有各類單人與多人遊戲,可上線也可使用多滑鼠,這提供給玩家近年來最有創意、最獨特的遊戲體驗。 此外,在遊戲回合間,還有經典功夫攝影風格的過場動畫,描述年青功夫高手如何過關展將。

系統需求

    最低:Pentium3 800 MHz (或相容處理器),256 MB RAM,GeForce 2 (或相容顯示卡),Windows 98,Steam 的網際網路連線

    同時有 8 位 AI 玩家或在大型線上遊戲中時,遊戲可能會較為不穩。 只有 Windows XP 才支援使用多滑鼠遊戲
    建議:Pentium4 1500 MHz (或相容處理器),512MB RAM,DirectX 9 相容顯示卡,Windows XP,連結 Steam 的網際網路連線

    可與大部分的 DirectX 9 相容顯示卡搭配使用
具參考價值的用戶評論
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
1.4 記錄時數
張貼於:11 月 1 日
I played this game when it first came out and let me tell you, it was amazing! You may ask yourself why, and write it off as a simple am gimmicky game. The truth is that this game takes some serious skills and has a lot more depth then you would think. There used to be a small friendly and competitive community back in the day and we would host our own tournements. The reason this game died out is not because it wasn't good, it's because there has always been a problem hosting games and playing with others. You see the developer never added dedicated servers as a feature, therefore we all played through pretty much one or two people who somehow were able to host the game. If this community ever came back to life and dedicated servers were added (or something!) , I would be first in line. Long live RDKF!

10/10

(Siu Mei)
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
30 人之中有 27 人(90%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
3.1 記錄時數
張貼於:03 月 1 日
Rag Doll Kung Fu.
First Non-Valve Tittle available for sale on steam.
Rag Doll Kung Fu developer Mark Healey cashed in with the first fully marked title based on the Source Havok Engine.
Released shortly after Half 2 Episodes, Rag Doll Kung Fu offered single and multiplayer games, either online or with multiple mice,
With system requirements as low as: "Pentium 800 MHz (or compatible), 256 MB RAM, Ge-force 2 (or compatible), Windows 98, Internet connection for Steam" you could literally play this game on one of your grandmothers shoes.

Slow Applause.
*****
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
17 人之中有 14 人(82%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.2 記錄時數
張貼於:2013 年 07 月 28 日
First non-Valve game on Steam. Bought it when it came out, the dedicated MP servers are long gone but it's worth a play co-op, single player or tunngle/hamachi multiplayer.. worth it just for the cutscenes, theme song and style.. p.s. you can edit the theme song too, change the channels, levels, pitch etc.. funky.
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
11 人之中有 8 人(73%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
3.9 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 22 日
A mouse workout! Love this game.
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
11 人之中有 7 人(64%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
3.3 記錄時數
張貼於:2012 年 09 月 15 日
悪の妖術忍者軍団にさらわれたお姉さん(?)を探して師匠達と奮闘する愛と感動の超大作格闘カンフーアクションゲムーだよ、スチムー最初のインディーゲムーおもしろいNE
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
23 人之中有 13 人(57%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.0 記錄時數
張貼於:2012 年 01 月 7 日
1st 3rd party game released on steam
1st regrettable purchase made on steam
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
12 人之中有 7 人(58%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.6 記錄時數
張貼於:04 月 24 日
One Finger Death Punch pales in comparison to this holy grail of ragdoll action. Buy it now, the metascore is lying to you. You play as a guy who wears a cap that makes him look bald. Just buy it now. Please. For the sake of Bruce Lee
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
14 人之中有 8 人(57%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.8 記錄時數
張貼於:03 月 29 日
Bruce Lee would be proud (?)
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
3 人之中有 2 人(67%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
2.5 記錄時數
張貼於:2010 年 12 月 20 日
I can remember many drunken nights I spent enjoying the $#!+ out of this horribly demented 2d, paper-puppet, kung-fu parody, mushroom trip of a game.
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
15 人之中有 8 人(53%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.6 記錄時數
張貼於:06 月 27 日
Creative and fun. And the reason I joined steam.
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.6 記錄時數
張貼於:2012 年 07 月 25 日
kickass
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
2.0 記錄時數
張貼於:2012 年 01 月 1 日
Best Game Ever
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.1 記錄時數
張貼於:2012 年 09 月 21 日
I have no idea why I bought this.
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
2.2 記錄時數
張貼於:2012 年 07 月 13 日
weird and funny and worth the money
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
5 人之中有 2 人(40%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.1 記錄時數
張貼於:2011 年 10 月 15 日
I don't really like this at all actually. Controls feel awful.
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
18 人之中有 7 人(39%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
張貼於:2011 年 02 月 21 日
Avoid it, I tried it and wanted to get used to the wierd play mechanics, but it was not natural or easy, So many other better games... why bother?
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
15 人之中有 5 人(33%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.1 記錄時數
張貼於:2011 年 12 月 17 日
It doesn't play all that well to be honest. The graphics look okay, but the gameplay itself is too, well I wouldn't want to say hard, but you have to keep a lot of things in mind and be on your toes if you want to succesfully beat someone, or just the objectives. It minimizes the fun factor. I honestly think they could've built a better game around this ragdoll mechanic. Would I want to see a new or other game with this kind of ragdoll fighting ? No. It's 'fun' for just a few minutes at best. Keep away.

[Rating: 62/100]
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
9 人之中有 2 人(22%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
1.8 記錄時數
張貼於:11 月 10 日
Incredible game. You should pay up to $100 for this game.
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
22 人之中有 8 人(36%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
3.9 記錄時數
張貼於:2013 年 12 月 13 日
best of the best
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
32 人之中有 12 人(38%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.1 記錄時數
張貼於:2013 年 11 月 25 日
You buy it because you're curious...

You uninstall it because its gameplay is really annoying and the novelty dried out... fast...
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?