À la une
Logiciels Démos ACTUALITÉS Recommandations
Inventez ce que vous voulez à partir de ce que vous trouvez, des catapultes aux incroyables machines volantes.
Date de parution: 15 oct 2010
Tags populaires des utilisateurs pour ce produit :
Visionner la vidéo HD

Acheter Doc Clock: The Toasted Sandwich of Time


“Je suis un inventeur !”
8.5/10 – Tierra Gamer
“Doc Clock est vraiment quelque chose d'ingénieux, débordant de personnalité et de chouettes idées”
– GameZebo
“Il n'y a rien de plus satisfaisant que de dévaler une colline dans un véhicule construit avec une baignoire et de vous lancez à plusieurs dizaines de mètres dans les air”
– MMGN / N4G
“Je me sens désormais intelligent, grâce à ce jeu”
– Totalbiscuit / Cynical Brit
“Vaut incontestablement la peine d'être examiné”
89% – GameVortex

À propos du jeu

Tombé d'une falaise ? Coincé au fond d'un volcan ? Votre dernière invention vient d'être détruite par un ours polaire ? Évitez cela grâce à la machine à remonter le temps de Doc Clock. Profitez de la première aventure de voyage dans le temps de Doc Clock ! Créez et inventez tout et n'importe quoi (des catapultes, des machines à voler...) en utilisant ce que vous trouvez. Voyagez à travers le temps alors que Doc Clock affronte des robots fous et mal-intentionnés pour de sauver son chat. Et pourquoi pas inventer le parfait grille-pain.

Caractéristiques :

  • Construisez des engins incroyables à partir de pièces détachées
  • Retourner dans le passé avec l'incroyable machine à remonter le temps de Doc
  • Contribuer aux sarcasmes de Sack alors qu'il aide le Doc dans son voyage
  • Complétez tous les succès de difficulté variable pour maitriser le jeu

Configuration requise (PC)

    • Système d'exploitation : Windows XP/Vista/7
    • Processeur : AMD/Pentium 2.0 Ghz
    • Mémoire vive : 256 Mo de RAM
    • Carte graphique : GeForce 4 Ti ou équivalent ATI avec 64 Mo de mémoire vidéo
    • DirectX® : 9.0c
    • Disque dur : 300 Mo
    • Son : Compatible SoundBlaster

Configuration requise (MAC)

    • Système d'exploitation : OS X version Leopard 10.5.8, Snow Leopard 10.6.3, ou ultérieure.
    • Processeur : Tous les Intel
    • Mémoire vive : 256 Mo de RAM
    • Carte graphique : Nvidia GeForce 4 Ti ou ATI équivalent avec 64 Mo de mémoire vidéo
    • Disque dur : 300 Mo d'espace disque
Évaluations intéressantes des utilisateurs
7 personne(s) sur 8 (88%) ont trouvé cette évaluation utile
2.9 heures en tout
Please, Please No. - Seriously, No.

This game is terrible (such so that I have it in a folder named "Terrible" for which is was the first game to be placed into). Its an amazing game in concept that I would love to give the chance to be great...if it could manage to do that. Its a piece of garbage that is thrown together into a contraption that just barely manages to reach its goal (oh wow, I totally just explained the entirety of the gameplay)

Is it a cool idea, yes. Is it a fun game, ...hard to say because its basically unplayable. Several times has this game refused to work...or has done something so ...wrong I can't fix it even with the included time rewind. Imagine Prince of Persia: Sands of Time with its time rewind except instead of being a game mechanic that is cool and awesome its a tool used to make sure that if you break the game you can rewind to when it wasn't broken. Like...you can rewind time...which is ONLY used to fix mistakes either you or the game has made.

There are some levels I remember playing that I don't know what to do on, the goal is obviously there, but no meaningful solution is there to reach it. Most the time, I just tried to get as many flying items as I could to strap to myself to fly over everything so I wouldn't have to deal with the terrible game.

Finally, I know in full well that I did not beat this game and so I cannot honestly say my review has full credible weight...but I did give it a good try, I wanted this game to be fun and work.. knowing full well it could be bad. I was let down, I write this in hopes that you are not let down. I would say.. perhaps plead with you to not get this. Its not a bad game, its unplayable.
Posté le : 14 avril
Cette évaluation vous a-t-elle été utile ? Oui Non
7 personne(s) sur 10 (70%) ont trouvé cette évaluation utile
1.6 heures en tout
Posté le : 21 juin
Cette évaluation vous a-t-elle été utile ? Oui Non
2 personne(s) sur 3 (67%) ont trouvé cette évaluation utile
4.3 heures en tout
The main thing about this game is that you can invent things with wheels, propellers and springs. The problem is that once you've designed a two-wheeled bike with an umbrella, spring and rotablades all round, in some sort of trash-pile mess, you realise that there's very little imagination needed. Glue all parts to the engine and it works. Also, poor, generic level design will have you easily forgetting what level you are on; there's green, there's ice and there's fire. Not that any of these are particularly well done either. The designers just assumed you'd come across the levers that open the doors without giving you any indication where they should be or what they open.

The building is as irritating as the physics are twitchy. The movement off vehicle is slow and you'll often die because he fell in a certain way.

And let's not forget the 'hilarious' banter between Sack and the Doc. Which wouldn't be a problem except that the speech bubble also gets in the way sometimes.

I also had a problem when the game decided to corrupt all my saves at one point. Not something I've seen in a game for a long time. Might be a one off.

On the plus side, you can rewind time to correct any mistakes. You'll be using this a lot. Not because you will fail but because it is easier to rewind than rebuild after being hit by a projectile that came from an enemy outside the screen.

If you want to use your creative mind to solve puzzles (not that there's much puzzling here) try Crayon Physics instead.
Posté le : 8 avril
Cette évaluation vous a-t-elle été utile ? Oui Non
2 personne(s) sur 3 (67%) ont trouvé cette évaluation utile
6.4 heures en tout
While this game looks and sounds pretty interesting, it's not very good. It's not that's that terrible a game, it's just that it's not worth your time or money.

Don't get me wrong, it started out fun. The whole "build your own vehicle from found parts" idea is interesting, but it quickly gets tiring and annoying when things don't go together the way they should.
The explanation of how things work isn't very good, especially your ability to rewind time. And the level design is pointlessly confusing and some sections are unfairly punishing. There was more than one level that I spent much more time on than I needed to, just because I didn't understand where I was suppose to go next.

And that's not to mention all the times I got stuck because the game bugged out and failed to register something I did. The worst example of this was on the very last level, when I got the last piece of the time machine (which is your overall goal for the game). I attached it to the rest of the time machine, and that (apparently) should have ended the level. Instead nothing happened, and I spent another hour or so trying to find where I was suppose to go next. I tried rewinding time to re-recieve the part, to trigger the end, but that didn't work either. It wasn't until I replayed the whole level that it finally worked.

I'm happy to be able to say I got to the end of this game, but I haven't completed it. There are so many things (toasted sandwiches & robot heads) to find, and achievements to do, it's pretty hard to complete.

That said, some of the dialogue is pretty funny, and the environments are pretty cool. It really was fun to start with, but it ended up a bit of a chore to get to the end. Also, the controls are wack!

Overall, had this game had half the bugs, it would've been pretty good. Unfortunately, it's a buggy mess.
Posté le : 25 avril
Cette évaluation vous a-t-elle été utile ? Oui Non
3 personne(s) sur 6 (50%) ont trouvé cette évaluation utile
3.4 heures en tout
probably the best named game ever made
I didn't really play it but I really like the name
you should get this so you can admire yourself for having such a title in your library
Posté le : 23 avril
Cette évaluation vous a-t-elle été utile ? Oui Non
10 personne(s) sur 12 (83%) ont trouvé cette évaluation utile
0.7 heures en tout
Tries to be unqiue but ends up being slow. Takes forever to do just about anything. Had a lot of potential though.
Posté le : 10 décembre 2013
Cette évaluation vous a-t-elle été utile ? Oui Non