《戰慄時空生死鬥:Source》(Half-Life Deathmatch: Source) 是《戰慄時空》系列的首款多人遊戲套件的重新創作版本。包含所有經典武器與最常使用的地圖,現在更加上 Source 引擎的威力。
使用者評論: 大多好評 (422 篇評論)
發售日: 2006 年 05 月 1 日

登入以新增此項目至您的願望清單、追隨或是標記為無興趣

包含此遊戲的合集

購買 Half-Life 1: Source

包含 2 個項目: Half-Life Deathmatch: Source, Half-Life: Source

購買 Valve Complete Pack

包含 24 個項目: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Portal 2, Left 4 Dead 2, Left 4 Dead, Portal, Team Fortress 2, Team Fortress Classic, Counter-Strike: Source, Counter-Strike, Counter-Strike: Condition Zero, Day of Defeat, Day of Defeat: Source, Half-Life 2, Half-Life 2: Deathmatch, Half-Life 2: Lost Coast, Half-Life 2: Episode One, Half-Life 2: Episode Two, Half-Life, Half-Life: Blue Shift, Half-Life: Opposing Force, Half-Life Deathmatch: Source, Half-Life: Source, Ricochet, Deathmatch Classic

 

由多名鑑賞家所推薦

"Same as HL1:DM with small engine updates"
點此閱讀完整評論。

關於此遊戲

《戰慄時空生死鬥:Source》(Half-Life Deathmatch: Source) 是《戰慄時空》系列的首款多人遊戲套件的重新創作版本。包含所有經典武器與最常使用的地圖,現在更加上 Source 引擎的威力。

系統需求

Windows
Mac OS X
SteamOS + Linux
    Minimum:
    • OS: Windows® 7 (32/64-bit)/Vista/XP
    • Processor: 1.7 GHz Processor, requires support for SSE
    • Memory: 1024 MB RAM
    • DirectX: Version 8.1
    • Network: Broadband Internet connection
    • Hard Drive: 4 GB available space
    Minimum:
    • OS: OS X 10.5.8
    • Processor: Dual core from Intel
    • Memory: 2 GB RAM
    • Graphics: nVidia 320M or higher, or Radeon 7000 or higher, or Intel HD 3000 or higher
    • Network: Broadband Internet connection
    • Hard Drive: 4 GB available space
    Minimum:
    • OS: Ubuntu 12.04
    • Processor: Dual core from Intel or AMD at 2.8 GHz
    • Memory: 2 GB RAM
    • Graphics: nVidia GeForce 8600/9600GT, ATI/AMD Radeaon HD2600/3600 (Graphic Drivers: nVidia 310, AMD 12.11), OpenGL 2.1
    • Network: Broadband Internet connection
    • Hard Drive: 4 GB available space
    • Sound Card: OpenAL Compatible Sound Card
值得參考的用戶評論
2 人之中有 2 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.2 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 13 日
戰慄時空(Half-Life)+次世代引擎(Source)+伺服器(Server) = 完美(Perfact)
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
9 人之中有 8 人(89%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
5.2 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 19 日
It's basically Half-Life, but in Free-for-all form. All the weapons from Half-Life are in here.

This game is DEAD though. So if you can host a private server and get a couple of your friends to play, then this game is awesome!

Great for fans of the original Half-Life. Not so good for people who just wanna play. Just don't expect to find anyone playing on a Public server.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
4 人之中有 4 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 2 位使用者認為這則評論很有趣
5.4 記錄時數
張貼於:04 月 20 日
fun game but its dead now lol

6/10
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 2 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
2.2 記錄時數
張貼於:04 月 11 日
While this game is the what we all remember it over a decade ago, I am disappointed to say that I cannot recommend this game to anyone but a digital-collector. This game is an exact port/remake of the original Deathmatch. This version does not have as many people playing, (probably because the only way to get this game is to get the Valve Complete Pack), does not have extensive custom map support, and you can't change even change your player model!!!
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
4 人之中有 3 人(75%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
0.2 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 13 日
This is pretty much the same treatment that was done for Half Life: Source, except it's the multiplayer this time. Again, I fail to see the point, as the engine is less utilized here than before, to the point that you feel like you were scammed. If you want a Source engine Half Life deathmatch game, go for Half Life 2: Deathmatch.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
30 人之中有 16 人(53%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.8 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 8 日
If your one to enjoy the source engine, but want to play the classic half life 1 deathmatch, then this title is recommended, but personally for me, the classic brought to the source engine is crap.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
1 人之中有 1 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
34.6 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 24 日
its half life 1 weapons physics etc, but with the ability to create new and intresting maps due to the hammer editor with stuff like acess to the havok physics engine, rope physics etc, oh and theres also ragdoll, beutiful beutiful ragdoll :3
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
1 人之中有 1 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
1.3 記錄時數
張貼於:04 月 25 日
Its a good fast paced game and has the retro feal(its 2015)
I enjoy this.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
1 人之中有 1 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.4 記錄時數
張貼於:05 月 6 日
Pretty freakin' good, even today.
Had a lot of fun with it, and it's quite surprising that this game has a good amount of players,
you know, because it's 10 years old?
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
3 人之中有 2 人(67%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
0.2 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 15 日
I'd love to play this but the servers are completely and utterly empty.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
5 人之中有 3 人(60%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 3 位使用者認為這則評論很有趣
3.1 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 20 日
Ran into a laser tripmine and my game crashed. 10/10 would play again. The ppl who say this is not reccommended, you suck.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
7 人之中有 4 人(57%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.4 記錄時數
張貼於:03 月 30 日
this game is dead dont buy it
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
6 人之中有 3 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
4.7 記錄時數
張貼於:04 月 6 日
no
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
4 人之中有 2 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
155.4 記錄時數
張貼於:03 月 19 日
Good God, I would never recommend this to someone if my life depended on it. Here's my reasons.

-Spamming of the Tau Cannon. This bad boy can go through multiple walls, not hit you, and kill you. People SPAM this a LOT.

-Excessive bhopping. You'd be lucky to kill someone who does this a lot. Like really lucky.

-Spamming of MP5 grenades. These are OP as hell in this game, and people love to spam them because they don't know how to use the primary function of the MP5.

-Rigging of the map with tripmines/satchels. If you see this happening you're screwed. Generally every single corner and spawn would be rigged. And these are OP as well.

-Spamming of the RPG. Yes, people do this. It's annoying.

-Ability to press the Crossfire nuke button multiple times, causing multiple nukes. Really, Valve?

-Most servers give you longjump on spawn, making bhopping excessively easy.

-Subtransit has two trams now because of glitches with updates.

-Most players are A-Holes. You kindly recommend [not even demand] that they use a different weapon and they go apesh't on you and call you a whiner.

-HACKERS. Most of the players are hackers, even the admins. So that means you can't report someone for hacking. They will not care.

-Hypocritical servers. This one server has swearing in its death sounds, yet it's like "no swearing plz". No one enforces this though.

-People tend to wonder why this game is near dead. The things I listed above are most likely why.

And those are my reasons. This game is NOT worth it. And if you're good at FPS's, that's not enough. You need to be extraordinary at FPS's to get around in this game. Never buy this game. EVER.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
4 人之中有 2 人(50%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
1.4 記錄時數
張貼於:01 月 13 日
It's clearly easier to find the Saint Graal than a Half-Life Deathmatch server with people on it.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
151 人之中有 131 人(87%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
張貼於:2011 年 09 月 22 日
i always wondered what the source of hl2dm was
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
46 人之中有 40 人(87%)認為這篇評論值得參考
5.5 記錄時數
張貼於:2013 年 12 月 28 日
Very fun game, do NOT let the graphics decieve you.Here, I'll list the pros and cons of the game:

PROS:
1.People dont talk much,so not much of a risk of being called "♥♥♥♥♥♥" or any of that ♥♥♥♥.
2.Better than COD
3.Cheap!
4.Fun gameplay with a large assortment of weapons

CONS:
1.For some reason,it lags for me.I have no idea why.
2.Graphics are bad (But no one cares! :D)
3.Not many people actually PLAY the game.

So please,EVERYONE PLAY THIS!ITS FUN!
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
64 人之中有 51 人(80%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
6.5 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 08 月 8 日
Finding a server that has people on it Simulator 2014. :(
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
50 人之中有 42 人(84%)認為這篇評論值得參考
0.7 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 01 月 26 日
OMG THESE GRAFHICS SUCK.

Shut up stupid guy who thinks that graphics are the best parts in a video game.

This is great. I don't own Half Life yet, but if Half Life 1 is like this, then I'll be happy.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
55 人之中有 44 人(80%)認為這篇評論值得參考
18.8 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 05 月 6 日
Awesome classic multiplayer game although it needs more players
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣