October 22, 2009 - Update Wargaming.net has released free Downloadable Content for Order of War. The DLC will download automatically the next time you launch the game. This DLC contains all the formerly exclusive pre-order items which include: Heavy Bomber Squadrons - Addition of German Arado and Allied B-24 Marauder heavy bomber units...
User reviews: Very Positive (91 reviews)
Release Date: Sep 22, 2009
Popular user-defined tags for this product:

Sign in to add this game to your wishlist or mark as not interested

Buy Order of War™



"A stunning game…" - http://gameinformer.com/games/order_of_war/b/pc/archive/2009/10/06/review.aspx (8.25 out of 10)

"Great mechanics and a beautiful presentation make Order of War shine brightly among some incredible WWII strategy games." - GameZone (8.2 out of 10)

About This Game

October 22, 2009 - Update
Wargaming.net has released free Downloadable Content for Order of War. The DLC will download automatically the next time you launch the game. This DLC contains all the formerly exclusive pre-order items which include:
  • Heavy Bomber Squadrons - Addition of German Arado and Allied B-24 Marauder heavy bomber units to air support
  • Infantry Mortar Launchers - Addition of infantry mortar units
  • Off-Map Heavy Artillery - Addition of heavy artillery strikes to the air support menu
  • Survival Mission Mode - New survival mission mode where you fend off waves of attacking enemies for as long as possible

About Order of War

In the summer of 1944, the Second World War entered its end-game when the Allies launched two major operations that would drive back German forces on both the Western and Eastern Fronts at once.
Their names were Overlord and Bagration. Overlord famously commenced with the D-Day landings in Normandy and ended in the Liberation of Paris, while Bagration - a far less well-known but far larger Russian operation - crushed the invading German forces in the east, leading to their complete withdrawal from Soviet territory. Had either operation been unsuccessful, history could have been very different.
In the ultimate test of military strategy, Order of War will challenge you not only to lead America's finest to victory in the west, but also place you in command of the German forces charged with repelling the Red Army's seemingly unstoppable offensive in the east. Even the keenest military minds will find that it's one thing to make history, but quite another to change it.

...Do you have what it takes to command?

Key features:

  • Experience WWII warfare on an epic, cinematic stage; that truly captures the intensity and scale of the battlefield.
  • Take Command of an entire armoured force consisting of up to 1000 soldiers, tank divisions, armoured vehicles, heavy artillery and air force.
  • Players can choose between two different campaign modes offering completely different storyline, missions, objectives and environments.
  • Experience the unique dynamic camera that allows players to command troops over huge geographical scale whilst maintaining movie-like vistas and detail.

System Requirements

    • OS: Windows® XP SP2/Windows Vista SP1/Windows 7
    • Processor: 3.0 GHz, DUO 2.0 GHz
    • Memory: 2 GB
    • Graphics: 256MB NVIDIA GeForce 7600/Radeon HD2400
    • DirectX®: DirectX® 9.0c
    • Hard Drive: 10 GB free space
    • Sound: Sound card
    • OS: Windows® XP SP2/Windows Vista SP1/Windows 7
    • Processor: DUO 3.2 GHz or better
    • Memory: 3 GB or better
    • Graphics: 512MB GeForce 9800/Radeon HD4850 or better
    • DirectX®: DirectX® 9.0c
    • Hard Drive: 10 GB free space
    • Sound: Sound card
    • Note: Increased performance will be noticed on an Alienware Area 51® X58 Desktop
Helpful customer reviews
3 of 3 people (100%) found this review helpful
5.6 hrs on record
I like to refer to call this as bag of crisps RTS, by the meaning of that it has the graphics and visual quality that gets pretty epic,especially when you use cinematic camera,but it has simplified water down game play that might disappoint those who are looking for a more tactical approach, also there is a lack of maps when it comes to skirmish and multi-player is none existent, although that can't be helped due to the collapse of game-spy, otherwise It is pretty impressive visual wise and I recomend this game if you want something to talk about at lunch break at work.
Posted: October 19
Was this review helpful? Yes No
4 of 5 people (80%) found this review helpful
3.8 hrs on record
Order of War is a largely missunderstood RTS game, and negative reviews are usually based on user's inaccurate assumptions of what they had thought it should have been. At the same time, if you look at the game as what it's intended to be, it's still just about average.

First, the campaign is dull and frustrating, and no RTS that was ever made should have ever been purchased to even try the campaign - these games are all like AAA fps games, Battlefield and Call of Duty, which are usually bought souly to just play the multiplayer side of things, or in an RTS game's case, the skirmish. The campaign lacks any excitement because it's an RTS game. Reviews based on anything to do with the campaign at all are pretty much a waste of time. We don't give Battlefield bad reviews for bad glitchy campaigns, we give it great reviews for the multiplayer. Same thing.

So we look at what deserves attention - the skirmish. Order of War is what Total War would've been if it had been based in WWII. There is no base construction and the maps are very large and open, always cutting teams in half so that you never spawn next to them. Units have no abilities, and there are only three factions. To choose a faction, you must play in multiplayer online, or stage a LAN game - as the skirmish mode limits you to senarios. Both provide bots. You can play as USA, Russia, or Germany, but all are almost exactly similiar, enough to not totally matter.

You purchase units based on they're effectiveness versus their cost kinda system. In other games, a better player will overcome a tank if fighting the same tank used by a bad player. This isn't the case in Order of War. You buy the bad tank, the good tank, or the best tank. The bad infantry, the good infantry, or the best infantry. It's not as strict as it sounds, fast firing shorter range mortars aren't camparable to long range slow shooting artillery guns, and you can get a few differing units like anti tank infantry or mobile artillery vehicles, but you understand. The store page mentions and shows off planes and junk, but these aren't actual units, only off map abilities and strikes.

Units move slow, and AT pieces, artillery guns and infantry must be consiously transported via truck by the player, otherwise they'll jog about to destinations at a mind numbingly ineffective, slow pace. These normal movements are more to change facings or to slowly advance, or to hide behind the OTHER side of a building if you take hits, and not to go attack an area, meaning so long as it's not a tank, you cannot shoot and move at the same time.

For all of these reasons, classic RTS strategy doesn't really apply to Order of War - the outcome of all battles are largely predictable because the units are either bad, good, or the best you can buy. This is probably the largest reason Order of War ever gets bashed. The strategy is missed because it's not the same as other RTS games, and people burn it down for not having the things it wasn't intended to have in the first place. It's like ♥♥♥♥ing on Call of Duty for not having Creepers and no resource collecting. What?

The game doesn't play like Company of Heroes or Men of War, and the strategy is completely focused on timing and movement. These are important in all RTS games, but in this game, it's the ONLY element to focus on. You buy cheaper units to occupy the space, and to distract, as there are no real indicators as to units taking damage. The maps are big and you have to keep your eyes on everything. The fun is completely based on troop movement, and being at the right place at exactly the right time. Infantry can't truck up to AT guns and take them out, they'll get blown away, so intercept them while the AT getting trucked themselves and have them set up just as you dismount infantry next to them. Things like that. If your enemy has bought nothing but the best tanks, they've got no resources and you can go ahead and buy some extremely cheap AT guns without the worry of taking an airstrike, and get a bunch of cheap tanks to rush the map once your AT has killed all of those scary bad tanks. There is no fog of war in this game, and once you realise it's about watching the other guys and moving your ♥♥♥♥ around instead of building strongpoints or bases or using some kind of grenade ability or something, then you'll realise what a fun fast paced game it really is. It's about moving around AT and artillery and tanks and infantry more than just sending ♥♥♥♥ off to fight, seeing as you'll already know which battles you'll win or lose. If you play it right, you won't lose a unit, and eat the other guys, and that's where the fun is <.<

At the same time, compared to just how addictive the gameplay is, it's not, the maps all look the same and so does the combat, unlike Men of War which has too much micro to ever have similiar firefights, or Company of Heroes which is too cinamatic to ever be boring. Knowing what kind of RTS Order of War is, it's great, but as a game in generally - and as you can see by my play time - it's >.> okayyyyyyyyyyyyy lol

Can you spam? Yes. Can you attack head on? Yes. Should you ever do any of these? Never. It's a game that's enjoyed only if you know how to play it :/ which at the same time, makes it slightly less user friendly. It doesn't look like there would be a large learning curve, but there is. If you just want to see mindless destruction, you can easily play the game the WRONG way too <.< which is what most bad reviewers have done.
Posted: October 2
Was this review helpful? Yes No
2 of 2 people (100%) found this review helpful
7.6 hrs on record
I like it so far, Ive only played skirmishes so far and they are very good I love the huge infantry-tank charges. To bad its not multiplayer anymore. But I recommend it to people who like Massive warfare, but you may think it looks complex but its really not if you've played any Total War games, or Men of War, or Company or Heros, Ect...
Posted: October 8
Was this review helpful? Yes No
2 of 4 people (50%) found this review helpful
25.8 hrs on record
Before i start - keep in mind that many reviews have been posted before Multiplayer was abandoned by the developers. Anyway:

Order of War is a game of deloying units and taking flags - there is no base building.

It has some good features:

*There is a certain level of tactical gameplay. This is pretty much simply decision-making about which reinforcements will be needed to counter your enemy's deployments.
*The units have a solid WW2 feel if not a little aged in graphical quality.
*There is a good variety of units with various infantry, motorised and armoured units to choose from. Adding to this there is a limited selection of air units available that can be countered by anti-air units.
*There is satisfaction to be had from breaking through the enemy front line and advancing to the next objective (objective meaning 'flag' because the game is essentially 'capture the flag').

Order of War however also has some issues that in my opinion stop this 2/5 game being rated maybe a 3/5 or 4/5.

*There is no Multiplayer any longer. By lack of Multiplayer I also mean no LAN either. This is a major show-stopper as the game seems almost geared towards Multiplayer than Single player. I can see the potential that Multiplayer would turn the routine flag stealing from a tactically-naive AI into an epic struggle of egos.
* The campaign feels a bit routine and by the numbers. It is a fairly monotone experience of basically capturing and defending flags.
*So with no Multiplayer at all and a join-the-dots campaign we need a good skirmish experience to compensate.
The Skirmish option allows some limited customisation but simply borrows campaign maps, uses them as a blank canvas and asks you to capture all the flags - a victory theme we are getting a little too used to in this game. And to limit things even further the developers offer you only a handful of maps.

Don't get me wrong. If you like WW2 RTS games you will still have some fun with elements of this game, but it will only be a temporary distraction from games with more replayability.

I would highly recommend the game if the developers simply:

Added more skirmish maps and make skirmish more customisable.
& Re-implemented LAN and/or MP capability. Why, when developers shut down servers, do they not replace online Multiplay with LAN is beyond me.

It's thumbs down until they restore at least LAN to the game and add some more content. The game feels half-baked.
Posted: October 19
Was this review helpful? Yes No
0 of 1 people (0%) found this review helpful
26.5 hrs on record
Very buggy. Constant "out of memory" crashes (I am running rig with 32gb RAM). Constantly messes up my multiple monitor setup.

Very slow loading/saving times.

Overall design is unfinished, game feels too slow and unbalanced.

No proper ending cinematic, and pointless WW2 scenes before each mission don't make any sense anyway.

The idea was there, too bad implementation failed.

Skip this one.
Posted: September 27
Was this review helpful? Yes No
4 of 7 people (57%) found this review helpful
7.0 hrs on record
Allowed me to send in endless waves of soldiers as cannon fodder.
Since there are no WW1 games this one is an good alternative with the right mod.
9/10 love this strategy game and the AI is not the dumbest.
Posted: July 16
Was this review helpful? Yes No
4 of 8 people (50%) found this review helpful
8.3 hrs on record
eye candy. game play its okay
Posted: June 13
Was this review helpful? Yes No
1 of 2 people (50%) found this review helpful
23.4 hrs on record
i jus buy this game with my friend and we cant Multiplayer!!!! lan is not working!
Posted: September 20
Was this review helpful? Yes No
1 of 3 people (33%) found this review helpful
0.2 hrs on record
You would have to be strongly intoxicated to enjoy this awful game, if you even can call this a game. You would think the Developers of this title would have atleast a basic knowledge of what makes a good rts however it seems they have no idea what they were making. And if singleplayer was not bad enough, oh wait the game features no multiplayer. Sadly I was suckered into buying this game when the price was much higher. It was torture enough during the first ten minutes of the game, I cant believe I pushed my self to play two hours of this terriable title. Of all the games I have bought on steam this has to be one of the worst...id rather go play snooker... anyone who says otherwise is either very dishonest or completley utterly mentally ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

Keeping it honest, keeping things real. - Ted Wikes of the most honest reviews known to mankind.

Posted: August 28
Was this review helpful? Yes No
0 of 1 people (0%) found this review helpful
2.7 hrs on record
pretty fun its cheaper in lithuania shop mall its worth every penny
Posted: May 21
Was this review helpful? Yes No
0 of 1 people (0%) found this review helpful
79.9 hrs on record
Fun and easy WWII game
Posted: June 13
Was this review helpful? Yes No
0 of 1 people (0%) found this review helpful
23.2 hrs on record
Posted: August 4
Was this review helpful? Yes No
0 of 1 people (0%) found this review helpful
22.9 hrs on record
It's a pretty good game i just finished both campaigns on the Hardest difficulty. They should have let you play as Russians
Posted: September 10
Was this review helpful? Yes No
0 of 2 people (0%) found this review helpful
33.0 hrs on record
I love this game, I'm a WWII history fanatic and the authenticity of the weapons gives it a boost in my top pc games choices.
Posted: July 26
Was this review helpful? Yes No
4 of 11 people (36%) found this review helpful
58.7 hrs on record
best strategic game ever
Posted: May 31
Was this review helpful? Yes No
1 of 5 people (20%) found this review helpful
24.7 hrs on record
Without Online Multiplayer, it's such a small game. The 6 skirmish maps you have are dull after a while and the AI is easy to beat on Hard mode, with high/low resources in either case.
It could be fun as eye candy if you could LAN, but I could not find a way to use the same copy of the game with Library sharing or Ctrl-Alt-Del'ing. (Why worry about piracy issues if you've killed your game from the Multiplayer genre anyhow?)

Overall, nope. You could get a small thrill when you first get the game but you'll just be bitter later on down the track.
Posted: September 13
Was this review helpful? Yes No
1 of 6 people (17%) found this review helpful
14.0 hrs on record
do not buy this game. It is a waste of money.at first you will love the game but not even a week later the game wont even start. unless someone can tell me how to fix this gamei will say its a waste of time and money.
Posted: July 31
Was this review helpful? Yes No
3 of 14 people (21%) found this review helpful
0.8 hrs on record
Stupid as World of Tanks.
Posted: July 6
Was this review helpful? Yes No
1.9 hrs on record
Its not exactly Men or War or even Company of Heroes, but if you want a fix of RTS with epic battles, with a dose of historical accurarcy. This one is for you. There can literally be up to a thousand units on screen at any one time, and tank battles are so entertaining to watch. Even features a cinematic camera mode, so after youve issued your orders you can sit back and watch the carnage in style.

Graphically I dont think its aged that well over the five years its been out, and the gameplay has been outdone by the likes of CoH in the RTS genre since but at the price its currently at I think its well worth for an RTS to check this game out.
Posted: July 15
Was this review helpful? Yes No
23.8 hrs on record
Awesome game. Would be up there with the best if it was moddable. Could definitely use more skirmishes. I had no problems with crashes or bugs. Would love to see a second installment. This game is way too much fun.
Posted: September 18
Was this review helpful? Yes No