參與軸心國與同盟國在二次世界大戰歐陸戰場的團隊戰役。玩家可扮演輕型兵種/突擊/重型兵種、狙擊手或重砲手。每一種兵種都可運用與史實相同的專屬武器。任務皆以歷史上的關鍵戰役為背景。隨著戰爭的白熱化,玩家們必須通力合作才能達成各種任務目標。
使用者評論: 極度好評 (1,233 篇評論)
發售日: 2003 年 05 月 1 日

登入好來將此遊戲加入您的願望清單或是標記為無興趣

購買 Day of Defeat

包含此遊戲的合集

購買 Counter-Strike 1 Anthology

包含 5 個項目: Counter-Strike, Counter-Strike: Condition Zero, Day of Defeat, Deathmatch Classic, Ricochet

購買 Valve Complete Pack

包含 24 個項目: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Portal 2, Left 4 Dead 2, Left 4 Dead, Portal, Team Fortress 2, Team Fortress Classic, Counter-Strike: Source, Counter-Strike, Counter-Strike: Condition Zero, Day of Defeat, Day of Defeat: Source, Half-Life 2, Half-Life 2: Deathmatch, Half-Life 2: Lost Coast, Half-Life 2: Episode One, Half-Life 2: Episode Two, Half-Life, Half-Life: Blue Shift, Half-Life: Opposing Force, Half-Life Deathmatch: Source, Half-Life: Source, Ricochet, Deathmatch Classic

 

關於此遊戲

參與軸心國與同盟國在二次世界大戰歐陸戰場的團隊戰役。玩家可扮演輕型兵種/突擊/重型兵種、狙擊手或重砲手。每一種兵種都可運用與史實相同的專屬武器。任務皆以歷史上的關鍵戰役為背景。隨著戰爭的白熱化,玩家們必須通力合作才能達成各種任務目標。

系統需求

Windows
Mac OS X
SteamOS + Linux

    最低:500 MHz 處理器、96MB 記憶體、16MB 顯示卡、Windows 2000/XP、滑鼠、鍵盤、網際網路連線

    建議:800 MHz 處理器、128MB 記憶體、具 32MB 以上顯示記憶體之顯示卡、Windows 2000/XP、滑鼠、鍵盤、網際網路連線

    Minimum: OS X Snow Leopard 10.6.3, 1GB RAM, 4GB Hard Drive Space,NVIDIA GeForce 8 or higher, ATI X1600 or higher, or Intel HD 3000 or higher Mouse, Keyboard, Internet Connection
    Minimum: Linux Ubuntu 12.04, Dual-core from Intel or AMD at 2.8 GHz, 1GB Memory, nVidia GeForce 8600/9600GT, ATI/AMD Radeaon HD2600/3600 (Graphic Drivers: nVidia 310, AMD 12.11), OpenGL 2.1, 4GB Hard Drive Space, OpenAL Compatible Sound Card
值得參考的用戶評論
41 人之中有 39 人(95%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
21.5 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 1 日
One of the best skill-based and highly technical WW2 shooters out there. Bullets kill people if you hit, the automatics need solid mouse control and grenades are very very precise. Also far more classes, weapons and an extra faction compared to the watered-down source version. It's also really fun to mod.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
39 人之中有 34 人(87%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 2 位使用者認為這則評論很有趣
8.1 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 13 日
Was on a server and a bunch of guys talking about the Russian Ophan uprising. I told a team mate a platoon of AXIS members were charging. The guys told me to shutup or they would feed me to them.




10/10 would talk again
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
30 人之中有 27 人(90%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
46.8 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 20 日
classic fps online game, one of my favorites. Still play, too bad theres only a few people( who i thank for keep it alive) playing.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
54 人之中有 39 人(72%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
0.4 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 10 月 6 日
Some old french woman kicked me from her server; would play again.. 12/10
Better than some games out there.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
39 人之中有 28 人(72%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 3 位使用者認為這則評論很有趣
184.5 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 10 月 24 日
*Guy next to you gets shot*
"Dead nade"
*Two people killed from friendly grenade including you*
You: "Dead nade"
*Kills another couple team mates*
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
25 人之中有 19 人(76%)認為這篇評論值得參考
636.5 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 2 日
[M|475|M] Jag2

My go-to game. No cost to play but the $5.00. Works on PC and MAC.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
19 人之中有 15 人(79%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
5,918.6 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 8 日
great classic fps wwII game
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
9 人之中有 8 人(89%)認為這篇評論值得參考
26.5 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 09 月 21 日
This is a great game for all WWII genre fans. There are only a couple of servers but they all have a good amount of people playing on them. People stratigze with thier team and are serious about the game.

10/10

One of the best ive ever played, and worth it for only 5 dollars.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
8 人之中有 7 人(88%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
2.6 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 10 月 12 日
Still reigns with packed servers. The community hasn't died and never will. Hours of fun based on a WW2 Theme. Not the best graphics but it's well worth the money!
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
15 人之中有 10 人(67%)認為這篇評論值得參考
132.3 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 10 月 19 日
amazing game...way better then dod:source
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
4 人之中有 4 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
6,031.5 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 13 日
Great game. It's a shame people try to cheat years ater the game first came out though.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
10 人之中有 7 人(70%)認為這篇評論值得參考
769.2 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 11 月 6 日
One of the greatest games EVER! ;)
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
3 人之中有 3 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
18.6 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 09 月 13 日
Day of Defeat is a WW2 themed multiplayer team and class-based game of capturing and holding off points. Capturing points is not the only gamemode, but most played, if not only one, around. You could get betas of the game for free as mods for Half-Life 1, but the final versions were released as paid Retail product by Valve. And as you can see, it got on Steam too.

First thing first, since it's a multiplayer title... How is community of this old game? It's doing well! It may not have overwhelming amount of players, but you will always find few almost-full servers. And while dod_avalanche map appears to be favourite among the community, you still will get to enjoy some maps variety on various servers. Not so much on game type variety though, capturing the flags points is most played.

As said, Day of Defeat is a WW2 shooter. Team and class based. A mix between arcade and realism. Weapons are as deadly as in many such shooters, just having single person rush forward will do no good, should do that in team. Many weapons also have big recoil, which depends on your stance: moving, standing, crouching or prone. Being prone is the slowest and clunkiest, easy to hit from above, but harder from long distances, also giving character almost no recoil when shooting. Yes, camping is a viable strategy here, but I feel that I have more chance to break through camping than in, say, Counter-strike. Players can respawn any time, so putting yourself to risk isn't bad idea. Each character also have a stamina, which is used when you spring and jump, slowly recovering afterwards. The slowing effect after using it is quite punishing, so you should sprint from cover to cover. Don't use sprint when moving to the front from the spawn point.
Maps are designed to be more of pipes, like classic maps, not open fields, providing a main path and few flanking routes. Even more curious, the maps are assymetrical, which may possibly provide some inbalance (I think that Nazis in Avalanche map have height advantage). Breaks the usual symmetry monotony though, more interesting. Some maps even feature British forces instead of American ones. (they have less classes though)
No, this one doesn't have vehicles, it is not Battlefield after all.

Each team has up to 10 classes. The only difference most have is primary weapon and whether they have or not grenades to spam at corners and choke points. None have ironsight, if you wonder, aside from scope for sniper rifles. And most of primary weapons tend to be quite similiar to each other, which I don't like, as I prefer classes to be more diverce... something what Day Of Defeat Source did. Classes can be divided into:
1) Close Range Assault classes - have guns with light recoil, good for running and gunning, and then getting one-hit killed by another rushing rifleman.
2) Assault Support classes - more recoil, medium range, they better occasionally crouch or stand to be able to litter enemies with bullets at close range.
Close range and Support get mixed a bit together, making other classes.
3) Riflemans - Killing mens with one bullet per few seconds, medium-long range class. Well, and short one too. Only bad when rushed by few mens. Just crouch occasionally
4) Machine Gunners - limited, they can deploy their machine gun on sandbags or while prone. Their machine gun allows them to give your team control over area. Just watch out for snipers and grenade spam. No grenades.
5) Snipers - not really much of different from Rifleman, just got scope and more accurate while scoped. No grenades though.
6) Bazooka - You got rocket launcher. And if you imagine infantry going "whee" from rocket - too bad. It's a utility weapon, which only very few maps have use for, like blowing tank in some map (that I didn't get to play in public servers yet). Very annoying whenever Random keeps giving you this class.

The graphics technically are quite outdated, but still provide it's own quirk. The music is almost non-existing. Only main theme and victory tunes are there.

So, nice game, especially when measured with other HL1 mods. Still fun and still has active multiplayer. But the people who don't like hitscan weapons and who like to get right into action, it's not for them.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
3 人之中有 3 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 2 位使用者認為這則評論很有趣
0.2 記錄時數
張貼於:01 月 24 日
Nazi Simulator
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
3 人之中有 3 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
12.5 記錄時數
張貼於:01 月 2 日
I don't know what to say about this game, so here is a recipe for pancakes,

Ingredients:

4tbsp plain flour (about 100g)
1 large free range egg
½ pint semi-skimmed milk + water (about 300ml - ¾ milk ¼ water)
Pinch of salt
Butter for frying
How to make pancakes:
Sieve the flour and salt into a large bowl and make a well in the mixture.

Break in the egg and stir to make a breadcrumby mix.

In a jug add 1/3 of a pint of milk and top up with water to make 1/2 a pint (200ml milk, 100ml water) - this makes a lovely light batter.

Add the milk and the water mix bit by bit, beating constantly to avoid lumps.

Tip:*If you have a food processor just throw all the ingredients in and zap until smooth!

Pop a large frying pan over a medium heat.

Add a large knob of butter (roughly 50g) and melt.

Pour the excess butter into a small bowl and reserve it for later.

Using a ladle pour a spoonful of the pancake batter into the hot pan and swirl to get a full covering - cook for about 1 min each side (it's ready when it's easy to flip over).

Serve immediately with sugar and lemon or other exciting toppings. We love cheese and Marmite for an extra British twist! Delicious!!
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
9 人之中有 6 人(67%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
1.7 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 10 月 28 日
Never had so much fun being repeatedly 1-shotted.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 2 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
217.0 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 14 日
GAME IS ALIIIIVE
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 2 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
13.1 記錄時數
張貼於:01 月 5 日
stabbed a cow and it exploded 10/10
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 2 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
0.1 記錄時數
張貼於:01 月 12 日
>Play as Nazi's.

10/10
100/100
Best game.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
2 人之中有 2 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
64.6 記錄時數
張貼於:2014 年 12 月 21 日
One word, dod_avalanche.
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣