“An innovative approach to TD. Worth playing to experience something different. Difficulty reduces fun. 6/10.”

“Complex game. Good game play. Several hours of entertainment. 6/10.”

“It's in the genre of Plants vs Zombies. Similar layout, but simpler game and less strategy needed. It is also humorous, so it is entertaining for a few hours. 5.5/10.”

“A simple TD game. The graphics are good and the game play is entertaining for a little while. Not on my favorites list. 6/10.”

“An "okay" TD game. Unnecessarily complicated to play and weave through. Marginal graphics - functional but not engaging. Take it or leave it. 6/10”

“Fairly straightforward. Modest graphics. I didn't find it exciting. I am giving it a marginal rating 5.5/10. ”

“Great graphics. Complex TD game. Dynamic maps. Several Heroes. Good fun. Luck involved. Takes a while to figure out. Hard to know properties of turrets versus enemies. 9/10”

“Good graphics and high complexity. The game-play is unusual and innovative compared with other TD games. It took me a while to like it. It is among the better TD games. Short. More to come? 9/10.”

“Good game. Worth a try - some TD fans will like it, many probably won't. Good graphics. Gameplay is common with few innovations. Very slow loads of maps. Some bugs. 6/10.”

“Same foundation as "Plants vs Zombies" (2009, original). Very similar. Play PvsZ first, if you haven't. This one is good, but not quite the same charm and sophistication. PvsZ Genre is outdated.”