The pretty visuals is about all this has going for it; the walking simulator gameplay mixed with a high school level story scrawled on walls doesn't quite fit together. Is it a Soulslike? Not at all.

I don't remember Dark Souls charging me a couple bucks at a time for a chance at getting that +15 Claymore I always wanted. Not a soulslike in the slightest.

No, it's not like Souls. Just because you can die and return to the point where you died does not make it like Souls. Aside from that, Cuphead is a quality game.

It's not a soulslike at all, however this is a great installment to the Arkham series and my personal favorite. It's basically a polished version of the original Arkham Asylum.

No, this is not a soulslike because you can die and there are swords in it. If anything, it's just an open world beat-em-up. That being said, Shadow of Mordor is a good one.

Just because "Hollow" and "Knight" is part of the title does not mean this game is a soulslike. It's more akin to a Metroidvania than anything else.

Even though it's currently unreleased, a demo was released through Kickstarter some months ago. This is looking to be a very promising soulslike, the first of its kind.

It's not enough like Souls, not enough like Bloodborne, and not enough its own thing to be considered a soulslike, let alone considered GOOD.

Yes, this has enough to be considered a soulslike. However, it's a terrible one. The enemies are terrible to fight, the world is a chore to traverse, and it revels in its own poorly crafted atmosphere

A soulslike in every way that the later games became; unnecessary and a blatant money grab. However, the PvP is mostly untouched, arguably the only worthwhile portion of Dark Souls 2.