您的 Steam 需要擁有主程式 SpaceChem 才能遊玩該內容。

使用者評論: 褒貶不一 (3 篇評論)
發售日: 2011 年 07 月 22 日
使用者對此產品下的熱門標籤:

登入好來將此遊戲加入您的願望清單或是標記為無興趣

可下載的內容

您的 Steam 需要擁有主程式 SpaceChem 才能遊玩該內容。

購買 SpaceChem: 63 Corvi

 

關於此內容

Explore the past with SpaceChem’s first DLC pack, “SpaceChem: 63 Corvi”. Follow a young Bruce Novak, the future CEO of SpaceChem, and his team of engineers on a mission to collapse the star 63 Corvi into a collapsar gateway and expand the human empire. Gameplay features a new mechanic, the “quantum junction”, which takes ResearchNet’s quantum tunnel to the next level.

Key features:

  • Includes seven new puzzles using the new “quantum junction” mechanic, including three pipelines.
  • Learn about the past of the CEO of SpaceChem with a new installment of the exciting story

系統需求

PC
Mac
    • OS: Windows XP SP3 / Vista / 7
    • Processor: 2.0 GHz Processor
    • Memory: 1GB RAM
    • Hard Disk Space: 300MB
    • Video Card: frame buffer support recommended
    • OS: OS X version Leopard 10.5.8, Snow Leopard 10.6.3, or later.
    • Processor: 2.0 GHz Processor
    • Memory: 1GB RAM
    • Graphics: frame buffer support recommended
    • Hard Drive: 300MB
    • Additional: Mono 2.6 or later
具參考價值的客戶評論
81 人之中有 80 人(99%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
For analytical thinkers, SpaceChem is hands down the best PC based puzzle gaming experience there is. Build, troubleshoot, and watch your solutions come to life. Then rebuild them with improved efficiency! It's a game that takes a lifetime to master, but there's really no wrong way to play. The majority of my solutions seem to take the Rube Goldberg approach, but they work and there's nothing more satisfying than seeing a working solution in action.

The 63 Corvi DLC provides a handful of additional puzzles and brings barriers and teleportation to the mix offering some serious head pounding challenge. Definitely worth picking up if you haven't given up on the base game already.
張貼於:2013 年 03 月 14 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
175 人之中有 4 人(2%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
This is tedious tho I don't really like it
張貼於:2011 年 11 月 3 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?