Check out the high-resolution trailer and see what the game is all about. Heroes of Annihilated Empires - 是结合了 PC 机的 RPG 和 RTS 类型游戏特点的魔幻三部曲游戏。 本游戏采用了全新的专利 3D 引擎。 游戏场景一发生在 Atlans 岛 - 历史上侏儒族的家园。 游戏世界中生动而纷繁,充满了魔幻、神奇的生物,当然也不乏英雄和强权力量之间大规模冲突。 游戏中允许玩家控制其中一个英雄,领导数千精兵强将参与战斗,或者单枪匹马奋战,充分利用兵工厂和强大的魔法符咒。 您可以提升英雄、增强能力、发掘武器和探险,极大地增加了游戏的多样性。
用户评测:
总体:
特别好评 (144 篇评测) - 144 篇用户的游戏评测中有 84% 为好评。
发行日期: 2006年11月22日

想要将这件物品添加至您的愿望单、关注它或标记为不感兴趣,请先登录

购买 Heroes of Annihilated Empires

 

关于这款游戏

Check out the high-resolution trailer and see what the game is all about.

Heroes of Annihilated Empires - 是结合了 PC 机的 RPG 和 RTS 类型游戏特点的魔幻三部曲游戏。 本游戏采用了全新的专利 3D 引擎。 游戏场景一发生在 Atlans 岛 - 历史上侏儒族的家园。 游戏世界中生动而纷繁,充满了魔幻、神奇的生物,当然也不乏英雄和强权力量之间大规模冲突。 游戏中允许玩家控制其中一个英雄,领导数千精兵强将参与战斗,或者单枪匹马奋战,充分利用兵工厂和强大的魔法符咒。 您可以提升英雄、增强能力、发掘武器和探险,极大地增加了游戏的多样性。

  • 在一个游戏中创新地集成了两种游戏类型 - RTS vs RPG
  • 全新 3D 引擎
  • 细致的游戏世界,以欧洲知名作家 Ilya Novak 的 5 篇魔幻小说为蓝本。
  • 数千精兵强将参与的大规模战斗
  • 4 中独特的种族,各不相同的技能、魔咒和武器
  • 12 位英雄、12 个中立种族、100 支部队和 150 中建筑
  • 绝佳的现成人物类型和引人入胜的动画效果
  • 超过 150 种魔法和 100 多种魔咒
  • 原创的精彩战斗情节
  • 经典的 LAN 或互联网多人游戏,可有多达 7 位玩家参与游戏。 混合了 RTS 和 RPG 两种游戏类型,允许玩家在两种游戏模式中进行选择。
  • 原创的魔法符咒卡片系统,对于菜鸟和高手来说都有同等的吸引力。 50 多张魔咒卡片
  • 整个游戏中人物角色还可以进行不断的升级提升
  • 极佳的配乐和剪辑。 有趣的精灵将在任务与任务之间的为玩家介绍更深入的剧情

系统需求

    Windows 2000/XP
    强烈推荐使用最新的显卡和声卡驱动程序获得最佳效果。 为获得更好的游戏效果,请退出所有的背景程序(即时消息程序、防病毒软件、系统监控程序)。

    最低配置:Intel Pentium 4 2Ghz 或 AMD Athlon XP 2000+,nVidia GeForce FX5200 或 ATI Radeon 9000 显卡,128MB 显存,512MB 内存、DirectX 8.0 兼容声卡,2.5 Gb 可用硬盘空间

    建议配置: Intel Pentium 4 3Ghz 或 AMD Athlon 64 3200+,nVidia GeForce 6600 或 ATI Radeon X800 显卡,1GB 内存,DirectX 8.0 兼容声卡,2.5 Gb 可用硬盘空间

    可选:通过互联网连接在网上进行多人游戏,最低要求:56K 拨号连接

消费者评测
消费者评测系统更新!了解更多
总体:
特别好评 (144 篇评测)
最近发布
Cihan Serter
( 25.7 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:7月7日
It has more Diablo style game playing than a strategy.

And building a base is almost impossible.

Enemy spawns quickly and attacks again and again.
That really annoys me.
Best strategy I developed is just to rush to enemy base and take out all the buildings.


And even I am annoyed I can't stop playing :)
是否有价值? 欢乐
anglerman
( 15.0 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:6月26日
I wasn't really expecting anything from this other then a bland uninspired game when I got it. Just wanted a new RTS that I haven't tried before and didn't even know it was made by the Cossacks devs, so my expectations were pretty low.
But boy, was I wrong about it.
While the fantasy aspects here are pretty generic (elves are good archers allied with fairies, undead are evil, dwarves are technological, etc etc), it's extremely well thought to make every race unique. Little detailes give all factions a flavor and lack of equivalences make them stand out.

Pros:
-Great RTS gameplay, lots of troops which can be quickly and easily maneuvered on the battlefield which in turn is large enough to acomodate different types of tactics. Plays very like Cossacks if you're into that.
-Visuals are stunning for a 2006 game. It has a nice oldschool 2d vibe to it, but being fully 3d with camera rotations and such
-Varied unit and building types: units have abilities which aren't useless! I personally enjoy how Dwarf musketeers cost resources to shoot but can hit enemies in melee as well.
-Base building is chunky and rather deep, unlike many of its kind.
-Tons of neutral factions all around the map.
-So far I haven't found any Humans in the game, a nice touch.
-Was expecting the AI to be dumber than it is.

Neutral:
-All about the RPG system: I don't really enjoy it very much, but it's not entirely a bad thing; it feels very similar to Battle for Middle Earth heroes, with very strong attacks and abilities and taking a long time to kill. They kinda make or break the game on their own and having to wait half an hour to use them in regular matches makes neutral camps a bit useless.
-Games may be overly long due to how everything scales up constantly.

Cons:
-Sounds: absolute lack of unit responses, although I like it better like this than with terribly acted voices saying the same thing over and over again.
-Music: while decent, the game has too few tracks, which can be quite repetitive and even annoying.
-Campaign: I'm quite sure it has to do with the steam version but there's a complete lack of cutscenes or anything to set missions apart. First mission suddenly starts with people running away and no context given other than the awkward conversations between the elves. So far I'm on the 5th or so mission and only had the chance to use one hero. Missions can be very repetitive as well while you have to exploit your hero's strength to slowly wear out neutrals and enemies for your army to stand a chance in such uneven matches.
-I'd love an option to zoom in a bit more.

The experience is great fun overall, 8/10
是否有价值? 欢乐
Kronos007
( 29.3 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:6月24日
WOW a game I got in a budle pack (From bundle stars) for about £4.75 (2016). Really surprised I missed this game somehow.

Its difficult in certain areas and can be flustrating to a certain point. But I love this game.

I would recommend it to anyone who like this type of game, not tried the online side yet if its still working I dont know, but will update my review once I get the chance to try it.
是否有价值? 欢乐
Eume -Stargate-
( 40.9 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:6月23日
Good memories, played this when I was 10.

**If anyone wants to play multiplayer add me!
是否有价值? 欢乐
Vicious Beast
( 2.1 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:6月18日
RTSes always have to be wary of plodding too much, and avoid getting into repetitive tugs of war in every match. Well, this game plods right past the idea of not plodding. Aside from the Steam Machine, which was pretty fun and reminded me of how great tanks and ambulances are in C&C games, the Dwarven side at least is mostly just about spamming riflemen and supplementing your mob with too few siege units.

The bases in this game are terrible. They take far too long to destroy, making it hard to make a sudden comeback when things swing in your favor, and making it take forever to lose when you're going to. In several of the maps, they're positioned in the corners, rendering attacks other than full frontal assault impossible.

The RPG mode was definitely not integrated into the game well. RTS players have scrunched up bases and rolling masses of warriors, not the sort of opponent that designers would use if they were making a pure RPG game at all. In terms of feel, it consists mostly of running backwards and shooting, rather than like Diablo, where you blitzkrieg through enemies, moving ever forward while constantly placing your cookie cutters for maximum damage, or like controlling a C&C commando, where every click could either send them to their death or destroy an opponent's structure.
是否有价值? 欢乐
Sarkoth
( 5.7 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:6月15日
Terrible gameplay, terribly outdated, very clunky.
是否有价值? 欢乐
Col. Six Lecko
( 0.4 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:6月10日
I'd rather play COHO
是否有价值? 欢乐
Death Rider
( 13.3 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:6月3日
Its old But its one of the best game i have played
是否有价值? 欢乐
wesleyhenwood
( 7.7 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:4月25日
Does not work, don't waste your time. Steam makes it VERY hard to get a refund. If the game actually worked I would give it 3 stars. If it worked and had a ramdon map generator or more than five (yes only 5!!!) skirmish maps, it would be 5 stars.
是否有价值? 欢乐
Taebrythn
( 13.2 小时(记录在案的) )
发布于:4月18日
Really fun game, but old as well. Relentless on attacking you when it comes to the troop building part. So yes you can make units and control a few variety. you also find yourself alone sometimes too with your hero in campaign. hit and run is a great tactic.
是否有价值? 欢乐
最有价值的评测  总体
36 人中有 35 人(97%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 1 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
15.1 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年12月29日
I am completely smitten by the game. Never did I expect to stumble on this gem in 2014 and enjoy it as much as I did. I always liked RTS genre with a twist, and what a twist RPG addition is! This is simple, yet brilliantly executed game gives you full creative freedom of an RTS game, but throws in a Hero who can level up and equip items. Seems simple enough, until you get your hero to level 80, who singlehandedly can shift the balance of the battlefield, unless you bring a significant army against him, or shut him down early on. This is an amazing little strategy game which brings novelty and freshness to its gameplay.
Campaign is really cheesy and cringy, but varied and extremely entertaining. Some magnificent easter eggs to be had there that make you beg developers for a Sequel.

Thoroughly enjoyed and well recomended.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
50 人中有 40 人(80%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 2 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
26.8 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年9月25日
What do you need to know about Russian-made strategies? They are awesome and epic.
If you like Warcraft, Age of Empires and Spellforce - you can forget about them. If only creaters of HAE could had more possibilities to continiue developing of this series, the game would become the only and the greatest of all fantasy strategies.
Nice graphics, video and comics, decent story, epic battels - This is Heroes of Annihilated Empires. Also easter eggs.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
32 人中有 29 人(91%)觉得这篇评测有价值
推荐
9.1 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年6月19日
A serious diamond in the rough. The campaign wasn't that good, the gameplay is a bit slow. But in the end, it's pretty innovative and I love the variety of all four playable factions.

There's also a huge mod for the game that should still be in circulation but I haven't looked into it recently myself.

As for all the reviews saying that the game does not work with machines over 2GB RAM; that issue has apparently been resolved as I learned just today. Game seems to work flawlessly for me now!

A side note: Elhant (the campaign's protagonist) really is a prick. Really. Please die in a fire you skinny little ♥♥♥♥♥.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
24 人中有 23 人(96%)觉得这篇评测有价值
推荐
16.8 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2015年2月18日
After 14+ hours with this game's campaign (and still more to go), and a few more hours with it's Skirmish mode vs AI, I can say that this game truly is a hidden gem of the RTS genre. Though the campaign story writing is cheesy and corny to an extreme, it is at least voiced by somewhat professional English-speaking actors. And though the writing is silly, the actual mechanics of the campaign were designed by an obviously smart and thoughtful team of people (even if English wasn't their first language...).

I've honestly never had as much drive in an RTS campaign to finish each mission as I've had in this game. The scenarios are very challenging and may require some reloads, but none of them (so far) are broken or impossible. The game rewards micromanaging but also overall strategy, and the units, damage types, spells, and technologies are very well thought out and designed. The game had bad PR, a questionable name, a foreign developer, and some strange design choices, but it was clearly made by hardcore gamers with a deep understanding of RTS mechanics and an exceedingly creative spirit. This is the last (and probably the best) game in the strange and exotic Cossacks series from long ago.

Add to this the fact that this game's graphics are easily some of the best ever from the mid 2000's era, and I was very impressed with the look and feel and how well it aged, even though I tend to be a graphics snob. The sheer wealth of fantasy creatures, all of which look pretty awesome even by Windows 7, 2015 standards, is amazing for a game this old.

The game has flaws for sure and a few bugs occured during the campaign, but basically, it's a ridiculously good buy for the content you get (expect about 20 h for the solo campaign), and is a great blast from the past if you're in a nostalgic mood. It is a tragedy the game's developers are now mostly defunct, though I do believe there is a community out there who still appreciates this game.

Please message or friend me if you are interested in doing some multiplayer skirmish games. I'm trying to put together a group that is willing to play on the occasional evening, because, even though the AI seems somewhat competent even on Normal, the sheer wealth of this game's units and spell strategies are best suited for the discerning mind of a human player.

Cheers, and I hope this helped!
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
49 人中有 37 人(76%)觉得这篇评测有价值
推荐
18.3 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年1月6日
Its a really great game! The problem though, is that its dead. I haven't tried the singleplayer and I heard its pretty bad, but the multiplayer is amazing. Only get it if you are thinking of throwing a LAN party and have other people to play with. Its worth it!
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
20 人中有 19 人(95%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 1 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
121.9 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年11月13日
I love the game. Don't let my hours fool you, I've played this since release. I saw it here and I wanted it on my Steam for a computer that the original disk won't work with so I bought it again here. I literally probably easily have 300-400 hours in this one, if not more, as I've played it at least weekly since 2006.

The campaign is ok, can be difficult but it is good for teaching you about the heroes and the units. I play the skirmishes. I never get tired of it. Sometimes I'll give myself an AI teammate and go against 3-5 AI teamed together or any of a million set ups I've tried over the years. There's still a couple of bugs but they aren't bugs so much as exploits which you'll probably never find anyway. Some AI pathing issues mainly with the dwarf constructs and the frost guys mammoth. I love that there are npc monster huts that you can hire and they auto send groups of troops out fighting. I was so disappointed that they never made a Part 2 or added more to this one but I still play it at least once a week, it's a nice break from my intense longer games.

I hope they sell a few copies here and decide it's worth doing another.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
36 人中有 28 人(78%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 3 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
2.2 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2015年10月5日
I initially thought to review this game perhaps after a dozen hours of gameplay at least, but I later found myself with a list of pros and cons written down in my head and felt it was right and reasonable to do it now. (at the moment I've played as little as 130 minutes). The reasons why I'm spending time to write this review are:

1. There are only 95 reviews, not enough. The community looks small and I'd never heard of this game myself despite loving RTS games with all my heart
2. As mentioned, I'm an RTS vidya aficionado. I have a lot of experience with such games and I love to be able to post a semi-technical review for once in my life, comparing everything that was done in the past to this 'modern' game.

First off, let me tell you my background with RTS games and similar genres mostly comes from countless nights playing Age of Empires II - so when I think of any real-time strategic game that's my anchor. If you don't like the whole base-building sub-genre (i.e. you strongly prefer RTS's like Warhammer or Company of Heroes where the focus is on point-capturing etc) don't consider the rest of this review at all; thanks God HOAE is a base-building RTS.

Back to the point, I can list several more RTS's I've played:

-The aforementioned Warhammer and Company of Heroes series (respectively dawn of war and the first title)
-All age of empires titles (including AoM), but the first game. I was too young at that time and never found the classical age inspiring anyway
-Warcraft III
-The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II
-Grey Goo (very recent, few may know it)
-Command and Conquers III
-Imperivm (European game, not known at all)

Non-RTS but still strategic games that have inspired me, and of which features were often present in many RTS games too:

-Total War series
-Heroes of Might and Magic III
-Others I can't think of

I know this whole wall of text might seem pointless or that I may sound like I'm bragging about my collection of strategic games, but it's quite the opposite, I'm simply trying to give a reference to anyone reading so that he or she can understand my point of view and pros/cons. Enough, let's start:

PROS

+Nice unit design in general -- Many units are well drawn, a handful are somewhat original.
+Good classic base-building -- Again, this is my POV. I've played so many annoying RTS's that focused on capturing resource points and lacked the building side to the point of forcing everyone to play in what we all call 'rushing'. You can't turtle in, you ♥♥♥♥ing can't in games like Company of Heroes. If you pick just 2 or 3 points you're doomed.
+Diversity between factions -- As with most 3/4-factions modern RTS's, all buildings and units are designed differently for each faction. I think however that GSC did a good job because most units have no real counterpart in the other races' respective armies. (e.g. a race having a few and expensive elite infantry units whilst its opponent has massed and cheap ones with relatively identical stats, and thus taking the same niche)
+Nice soundtrack, not as good as the OST found in many old RTS games, but very much decent and above average
+Excellent damage/defence system -- I liked this one quite a lot. Most games, even Age of Empires to an extent, ignore altogether technical mechanics like the type of damage a unit does. For instance, in AoE we get only 3 types: melee, missile and siege damage. Here, there's crushing, piercing and chopping or something, as well as magic damage. Every unit has its own damage type and natural resistance to a few other types. This detail makes battles much more strategic, as you have to consider what type of damage is most used by your enemy's forces and so on...
+Many unit specific upgrades -- Every unit has several improvements pertaining its damage and defence, some upgrades related to all faction units are present too

CONS

-No Age-up --Basically, the most common of all features, one that usually makes RTS games last ages, was totally ignored. Here the only thing that limits your civilisation/race's progress are a few locked end-game buildings that require you to build unrelated and cheaper ones in order to be able to construct them too. Pretty disappointing, even the aforementioned Grey Goo lacked this wonderful feature.
-No huge unit diversity WITHIN the faction --yeah you heard that right, I have applauded the developers/designers for making diverse unit sets between each faction, and now I whine because there's no diversity within the races themselves. I'm afraid I have to. If what I said above was indeed true, on the other hand they went too extreme with this originality, and forgot to implement a handful of units I would say are a must regardless how original a faction may be. Example: I've played almost exclusively as the Cryo race (some reclusive northmen with a taste for ice magic and many ancient alliances with beings who inhabit the tundras of all fantasy and mythologic settings), and they lack any kind of cavalry AND missile unit. All they have is a diverse array of slow uberbeings (yetis, giants, golems, mammoths) who deal melee -and almost exclusively of crushing type- damage. I understand it could of been for the sake of originality, but to this point? All I have for a ranged unit is either a spellcaster or a ballista. Seeing as all peons use bows, it is implied this society of northmen has a tradition of bow hunting of some sort, which is already implied by the mere fact of living in a ♥♥♥♥ing frozen land in the far north.
-Lame lack of unit-voicing --It bothers me so much that they don't say anything when clicked, dragged, ordered to attack, etc. Any RTS I've played had it, even Grey Goo... So why the ♥♥♥♥ not GSC?
-No unit-specific evolution-like upgrade --I'm so used to unit transformation and evolution too, and I can't feel satisfied with a bunch of armour and weapon upgrades. Like, even in HOMM there are unit upgrades, people love to see their 'whatever' transformed into 'lord whatever elite' with its stats multiplied by 3 for a nasty sum of resources. Again, a very common feature seen even in RTS games like Company of Heroes (the veteran upgrade or something), overlooked by GSC.
-Bad pathing of certain units --no further explanation is needed, you'll see it.
-Some elite units are too much limited in numbers --Most high power units can only be trained once per building type. It's like if you build some barracks the construction houses 10 pikemen and that's the maximum you can have. To train more, you're forced to set up a row of identical buildings. I understand the building limit per se, but perhaps some upgrades or an 'expand building' feature also present in other stuff would of been more reasonable... One ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ mammoth per building is too much to bear...
-Odd design choices in a few things --Like the Cryo heroes being all human but of different ethnicity. Others might think it's fine, but to me it makes no sense to have the Mage look like some caucasian bearded all man, the Warrior like an average Inuit fisherman and the Ranger a female east asian teenager. On the other hand, whilst this faction has weirdly designed heroes, and is somewhat original per se, typical faction/races present in all fantasy games, novels, films whatever are totally absent (e.g. humans, orcs, gnomes, trolls). Many neutral races are indeed present but only work as a source of income and artifacts (slaughter them) or as mercenaries; most of those would have actually been a wonderful addition to the small list of playable civilisations.
-Unit healing, lastly --yeah I don't know for other factions, but to heal my units with the Cryo I have to cast a spell repeteadly from my Temple or something, and that heals some 10% of all of my units... Pretty crappy and relatively expensive. Also, non-living units seem unrepairable, some have stated. Certain elementals like Ice golems and spirits self-regenerate.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
11 人中有 11 人(100%)觉得这篇评测有价值
有 2 人觉得这篇评测很欢乐
推荐
5.2 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2月12日
It's cossacks in a generic fantasy world.
If you enjoyed the cossacks formula but instead of pikemen and dragoons wanted to amass armies of werewolves, wizards and centaurs, then this is your best bet.

Don't expect anything extremely original, it's the same generic fantasy tropes: elves, undead, dwarves and "cryo" (humans/ice people).
And in those races, the unit types are pretty standard: for the elves there's griffins, ents & unicorns, for the undead there's zombies, mummies & liches and so on and so forth.

While the setting doesn't really break any barriers, the gameplay makes up for it with a certain massiveness and "realism", for lack of better terms.
You can, and you will, (literally!) trample over helpless elf archers with your dwarven machinery. Beign a gsg game it's not uncommon to see hundreds of units on the battlefield, and theres a certain satisfaction in destroying them, having their ranks break down, see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women.

Graphics are top notch, for a 2d game, they're amazing, and even all those years they still look like a fairytale, couldn't say the same if it was 3d.

Multiplayer still works after all those years, with gamespy being down, it's a privilege to be able to get multiplayer to work wihtout having to tinker with hamachi, tunngle or gamespy.

There's a hero RPG system "borrowed" from warcraft 3, it takes 20 minutes until the cooldown ends and you can use him, they're really weak early on, but when you get them rolling? They become small superweapons.
There isn't an 18 lvl cap like in, say, wc3, so you can get real high with the hero and wreak total havoc, especially with the proper skills & an army (that you got rolling while he was out of it) worthy of the title.

All in all, pretty good, worth trying out, at least because it's one of a kind (despite the generic setting).
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
14 人中有 12 人(86%)觉得这篇评测有价值
推荐
16.4 小时(记录在案的)
预发行版本评测
发布于:2014年6月19日
i enjoyed this game a whole lot. it was an easy going rts with rpg that you cant find in many games. the storyline was a bit corny and not well developed but overall i find myself reinstalling it time and time again to replay it.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐
19 人中有 13 人(68%)觉得这篇评测有价值
推荐
11.3 小时(记录在案的)
发布于:2014年4月24日
Great game a good blend of rpg and rts with a good story reminding me of the old d&d days, the multiplayer is dead and gone but to journey is still there in the campaign.
这篇评测是否有价值? 欢乐