Stronghold 3 Gold has been updated to patch 1.12.0. This update includes bug fixes with the units, castle making and multiplayer issues.
User reviews:
Very Negative (25 reviews) - 16% of the 25 user reviews in the last 30 days are positive.
Mostly Negative (2,172 reviews) - 28% of the 2,172 user reviews for this game are positive.
Release Date: May 25, 2012

Sign in to add this item to your wishlist, follow it, or mark it as not interested

Buy Stronghold 3 - Gold

Buy Stronghold Complete Pack

Includes 2 items: Stronghold Collection, Stronghold 3 - Gold


About This Game

Stronghold 3 is the long-awaited third installment in the award winning castle-building series. Set 10 years after the original, the Wolf it seems, has cheated death and during his painful recovery he’s become even more bitter and twisted. Now he seeks revenge. Raiding villages and towns during the dead of night, the Wolf has created a tide of panic and you and your allies are the only force that stand against him. In this stunning new update to the world’s favorite Castle Sim - will you triumph by day or die by night?

Key features:

  • Build and manage mighty castles with an improved building system allowing unprecedented levels of realism and intricacy
  • Realistic physics and cutting-edge graphics make siege warfare more brutal than ever.
  • Watch your village spring to life in an amazing depiction of medieval village life
  • Story-driven gameplay engages players across two campaigns: combat or economic
  • Dramatic night time sieges add a new dimension to the Stronghold franchise
  • Besiege other players’ castles or defend your own in a range of action-packed online multiplayer modes
  • Attack or defend accurately re-created castles from the pages of history. Will you succeed where others failed?

System Requirements

Mac OS X
SteamOS + Linux
    • OS: Windows® XP SP3/ Windows® Vista SP2/ Windows® 7
    • Processor: Dual Core CPU – 2.0GHZ
    • Memory: 2GB RAM
    • Graphics: 256 MB ATI HD2600 XT or better, 256 MB nVidia 7900 GS or better
    • DirectX®: DirectX 9.0c
    • Hard Drive: 5 GB space free
    • Sound: DirectX 9.0c-compatible sound card
    • OS: Windows® Vista SP2/ Windows® 7
    • Processor: 1.8 GHz Quad Core CPU
    • Memory: 4GB RAM
    • Graphics: 512 MB ATI 4800 series or better, 512 MB nVidia 9800 series or better
    • DirectX®: DirectX 9.0c
    • Hard Drive: 5 GB space free
    • Sound: DirectX 9.0c-compatible sound card
    • OS: 10.6.8 and above
    • Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo (Dual-Core) Quad Core Recommended CPU Speed: 2.4 GHz
    • Memory: 4 GB RAM
    • Hard Disk Space: 8 GB
    • Video Card: Radeon HD2600, Geforce 8600, with 512 MB VRam or better
    • Additional: Two Button Mouse
    • Supported Video Cards: NVIDIA GeForce® 8600, 8800, 9600M, GT 120, 320M ATI Radeon HD 2600, HD 3870, HD 4670, HD 4850, HD 5670, HD 5750
    • OS: Linux, Ubuntu 14.10, Mint 17 supported
    • Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo (Dual-Core) Quad Core Recommended CPU Speed: 2.4 GHz
    • Memory: 4 GB RAM
    • Hard Disk Space: 8 GB
    • Video Card: OpenGL 2.1 capable card, nvidia and fglrx supported
Customer reviews
Customer Review system updated Sept. 2016! Learn more
Very Negative (25 reviews)
Mostly Negative (2,172 reviews)
Review Type

Purchase Type


Display As:

(what is this?)
1,206 reviews match the filters above ( Mostly Negative)
Most Helpful Reviews  In the past 30 days
3 of 3 people (100%) found this review helpful
Not Recommended
5.6 hrs on record
Posted: October 5
Completely broken in a manner of ways. Sorry but it's just not on... Multiple obvious bugs that haven't been fixed. Even on level one. Broken collision leading to infuriating build methods and even more broken gameplay. Texture popping on walls. Texture mismatching on terrain. Certain mechanics which means the AI can instantly win. Multiple scenarios where by the best alternative is to just restart the level ( which is also infuriating ). I understand why this game has this rating... And I have to agree... For £23.99 Jesus thats crazy... not at that price... This game is essentially an early access quality abandoned project. That is what you are buying at a premium price. You have been warned.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny
1 of 1 people (100%) found this review helpful
Not Recommended
3.9 hrs on record
Posted: October 17
13 minutes in and I can already say I wouldn't recommend this game.

I've played every Stronghold game, so I'm looking at SH3 in comparison to the other entries in the series.

I went into the game expecting utter garbage based on the reviews I've seen. Was it? No, I don't think so. This is the best looking game in the series. Unfortunately, a few things bother me too much to consider playing it over the other SH titles.

FIrst of all, NO CUSTOM SKIRMISH. This means, you can only play missions they give you. Custom skirmishes are my favorite part of any SH game, so not including them here really cuts down on replayablity.

Another issue is the troop movement speed. Troops don't run. They mosey into combat. This makes gameplay incredibly slow and anticlimactic, which is enough for me to not bother continuing with the game.

Which sucks, the game does look nice (for a SH game) and I really enjoy how there is no grid-based building in this game. I could look past other various tiny glitches not worth complaining about, but the troop speed really kills this game for me. If they included custom skirmishes I may have been able to look past this, but not being a huge fan of Stronghold missions to begin with, this game sadly isn't worth it to me.

Luckily, Stronghold Crusader 2 fixed those issues, so at least Firefly learned from their mistake!
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny
Most Helpful Reviews  Overall
825 of 867 people (95%) found this review helpful
37 people found this review funny
Not Recommended
4.6 hrs on record
Posted: October 2, 2014
During the Pre-release stage of this game, skirmishes were promised against AI or Human players; Steam even had the feature on the store page as well. After watching the DEV-team videos and listening to what they were "promising" I decided to pre-order it (pre-ordered it the day before it came out).

Fast Forward a day and stronghold 3 was released. The features that I had purchased this game for were missing from the in-game menu and when I got out to check the store page they had removed at least half of the bullet points for what this game was promising. Fraud?

The game itself is riddled with issues; path-finding, graphical mishaps, and the beloved soldiers mixed with wall syndrome. The skirmish is no longer a skirmish of any sort but a rather boring and pointless sandbox free-build mode where you build a glitched-out castle on one of 7 tiny maps.

The campaign itself is TERRIBLE. The cutscenes are storyboards, which they try to play off as art (something only BL2 was able to pull off without it seeming like the game was rushed and released without polish).

Dont buy this game. Dont buy any games from the criminals at Firefly, i wouldnt purchase this game for $0.50 and it was the last game I have or will ever pre-order. It's worth noting that after reading reviews of their newest "game" it appears that much of the same happened yet again. They simply cash in on a halfway decent game that was made 20 years ago without putting forth much effort to change or enhance anything. Terrible company, terrible games, and terrible ethics.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny
576 of 606 people (95%) found this review helpful
194 people found this review funny
Not Recommended
23.3 hrs on record
Posted: May 7, 2015
I'm sure there are already enough negative comments to ward off even the stupidest buyer but I'm going to add mine anyway because leaving a negative comment is the only enjoyment I get from this game.

The initial release of Stronghold 3 may be the most shameful act in gaming history. If this were Japan, the staff of Firefly would be honor bound to commit Hari-Kari.

Like so many others I have been with the Stronghold Series from the start; absolutely one of my favorites until...Stronghold 3. It was more than a slap in the face to fans of the series. It was an insult to the entire gaming community.

It was months late from its expected arrival. Each delay accompanied by an assurance they were refining the game. What they were doing was hurriedly hacking together a cheap revised version of SH2. Even though the "frankenstein" they had created still lacked life, they released it upon the world, in time for the Christmas market.

Thanks to trusting fans and unwary buyers the game went gold immediately. The scheme had worked perfectly. They dangled it front of us with a lot of hype [lies], made a fortune in initial sales, delivered a bonified POC, figuring to patch the monster together in the following months. And then failed to deliver on that as well.

Here's an example of the refinements they were making. I call it, Mission: Impossible
One of the first missions is to defend the town from wolf attacks. I built 2 wooden towers with ladder access, put archers in them to intercept the wolves and reduce their numbers as they approached the town. The wolves came, climbed the ladders into the towers and killed my archers. Any playtesting at all could not miss this.

If releasing this abomination upon a trusting fan base wasn't despicable enough; consider how they treated the foreign markets. The Chinese were sold a retail copy that could not be converted to a Steam account. That meant they had no access to any patches except if a kind soul posted a cracked version somewhere. Let me say it again. They sold the Chinese unplayable versions of the game with no support. Anything for a buck.

I don't care what excuse they give for their actions. They cheated me. They cheated the world. And there's been no retribution for the crime. Firefly is dead to me. I don't look at anything that has their logo on it. There's plenty of new, respectable talent and castle building games are coming on all the time.
Firefly should stick to games about organized crime anyway. That's where their true talent lies.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny
291 of 304 people (96%) found this review helpful
13 people found this review funny
Not Recommended
74.2 hrs on record
Posted: January 26, 2015
I've had a few attempts playing this game, let me summarise:

At launch: a buggy mess, a festival of bugs and crashes and AI/UI issues. You could not place certain (crucial) structures like steps .. which would allow you to mount archers on the walls. Archers did not return fire as mace-men approached your walls. It was a ridiculous and frustrating mess. Only positive I can say is I liked some of the gritty art style.

A few months later: it seemed like the developer was as disappointed as most consumers .. there was apparently some advices saying they blamed the publisher who pushed for an early release, and that they would endeavour to give consumers the game that they deserve through patching and constant and consistent after-sale improvements. (Apparently the game we deserve is 'poo poo' because even with them working through the list of problems, the game, although playable in some ways, was still deeply flawed. Archers still wouldnt retaliate, still had issues placing simple things like stairs up to walls).

About a year after launch: I decide to give the game one last try. (Loved earlier Stronghold titles and the concept in general). They made some improvements to the game .. archers could fire back .. structures could be placed .. overall the game became somewhat playable .. BUT .. even after all that work they really barely achieve 'passable' .. archers may retaliate, but there's no mechanic for wall cover, and they get no elevation bonus to range or accuracy .. so basically 20 archers attacking a wall v 20 archers on a wall .. probably the attackers would win because they are clustered into one big kill-group, firing all their arrows together accurately, while the wall guys are scattered about and some would be out of range to attack... but yeah, basically the ones on the wall get no benefit). Also you'll place units on a wall and they will become un-movable. Just plain stuck.

So basically, despite a good legacy and concept, the game sucks.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny
342 of 369 people (93%) found this review helpful
12 people found this review funny
Not Recommended
2.4 hrs on record
Posted: October 30, 2014

Overall, don't buy the game. Its terrible... It doesn't live up to the Stronghold series. Don't even buy it on a sale even if its $7.49. Go buy a small game with 8 dollars, you can probably find something with more playability. Go ahead and buy those cheap DLCs or cosmetics you've been wanting for your other games. Go ahead... its much better to buy cosmetic DLCs or small packs then it is to buy this game.
Graphics8/10 The games graphics are probably the best in the Stronghold series, but there are problems stated about this below
Modes2/10 The lack of modes is terrible, there is no more skirmishes, there is a great lack of siege battles (and those siege battles are pathetic). There is no built in editor either.
Campaign1/10 The campaign is terrible! I haven't even got through the first mission it was SO poor!
Building placement3/10 This is a true horror. They added a nice new way to rotate buildings, but the downside is, it takes longer to place buildings now! But whats worse is the spaceing! You can't place buildings closer than 6 feet now! Buildings are so spaced, but the maps (which I won't do a category on) are also terrible! You can only place buildings on 1/4 of the map, because of the elevation, and the strict limits! You have to be careful of where you place, and you can only place so few buildings because of the stupid placement system.
Bugs and crashes4/10 I myself haven't saw much bugs (but I have heard of a lot) But crashes, theres a lot of that too. Not even 2 hours, and I already had a crash. The first Stronghold is more stable with crashes, even though I have Windows 8 and no compability mode on!
How it runs2/10 LAG LAG LAG and low FPS. I really don't know if its my computer or the game, but it has a low FPS. Other people have stated there was lag though. But it is bad... I can run 800 people with a small castle on the map in Stronghold 2 on high graphics, here I can't run 100 people on the map with even medium graphics. Avoid.
ExtraOnce, a Youtuber named DiplexHeated said,"The buildings are terrible. It all just feels like a village, unlike a castle you'd see in Stronghold 2."
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny
208 of 224 people (93%) found this review helpful
17 people found this review funny
Not Recommended
45.5 hrs on record
Posted: February 16
Have I not reveiwed this stinker yet? Geeze, it was like... two years ago now I played (and beat) it?

Personally, I don't care about the bugs, of which there really arn't THAT many compared to earlier Stronghold titles. The game worked okay for me and I got through the campaign without any real serious issue.

No, where I got upset, where I feel the devs truly betrayed everything that Stronghold stood for, was thinking I was no longer smart enough to build my own castles. That's right, its Stronghold, a castle building sim, in which you don't build castles. On every single player map the castle is already built for you. Oh sure, you can build a wall between two incredibly obvious cliffs to seal off a supposed weak point, but I wanted to build frickin' castles. The first game let you build castles. The first game said "Here's some land. There's a quarry. Choose where to place your stockpile ANYWHERE on the map and, oh, by the way, you're getting attacked in about ten minutes." That's what made Stronghold, Stronghold for me. Sure, they still gave you some castles in Stronghold 1, but they usually destroyed them in the first assault and made you rebuild them, often having to scrap some of the infastructure so you could pull your defenses back to a more practical postion. Stronghold 2 backed off of that, but still allowed for it, and on the missions you were given a castle to start, they were often little more than a ring wall and a single scout tower just to get you through the first attack. Stronghold 3... gives you a full castle on most maps, doesn't want to let you decide where to place defenses (and fights you tooth and nail when you try), and on the rare occasion you don't start with a fully loaded bastion, the places they want you to build are painfully obvious. In short, they've made what once was a good castle building sim into a below average Midieval RTS. For shame.

Throwing salt on the wound is the way they handled the story. The original Stronghold's story was pretty good, and the characters were humorous, colorful, and fun to listen to. Yah, they had dialouge in the first game. Good dialogue. In the first game you were supposed to be afraid of The Wolf. You would panic when he attacked your early castles, and the final two missions against him featured huge battles that saw nearly complete destruction of the castles involved. Comparitively, the Wolf of Stronghold 3 is a has been that should have stayed gone. Unfortunately this reflects on the protagonist as well who, while a capable military leader in the first game, might as well be a court jester in the third. Even the last few battles, where you go up against the Wolf himself, are so toned down it might as well be a sprawling bar fight. In the end, I was actually happy the game ended the way it did, they both deserved it.

TLDR: If you've never played Stronghold, get the first game. It's infinitely better than this turd, and you actually get to build castles.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny
179 of 188 people (95%) found this review helpful
8 people found this review funny
Not Recommended
0.9 hrs on record
Posted: February 20, 2015
I'm just.. i don't know. I'm shocked.

Back in the days I played ALOT of Stronghold and Stronghold Crusader and it was totaly AWESOME.

This "game" here is just.. i don't know. What the hell where they thinking?! The unit movement makes you think you're playing on half if not quarter speed. The pathing is ABSOLUTELY stupid. Unit attacks aswell - an example: Lets say you have 50 Man-at-arms (spear throwing unit) and ORDER to attack a group of enemy units atleast 40 of these Man at arms will throw their spear although the enemy man at arms dies from 3 spears maximum thus making 37 Spears go completly into vain.

No skirmish mode just "User maps"

I was realy fighting with myself to make a pro/con list but i just can't. It's pointless. I hate to say it but i see no Pro's in this game and i'm realy an easy customer when it comes to games.

2/10 max. Wouldn't recommend it and I'm glad that i got this game through a Bundle for 3Euros instead of paying 29.99 for this piece of crap. Holy hell Firefly what happened? Sh1 and Crusader were awesome? How could you ♥♥♥♥ it up that much?!

Like i said 2/10 max. Would not recommend.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny
233 of 267 people (87%) found this review helpful
228 people found this review funny
Not Recommended
0.6 hrs on record
Posted: January 30, 2015
Sorry,you are viewing the wrong site.
Go search "Stronghold Crusader Collection" or "Stronghold Crusader HD" instead m'lord.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny
266 of 310 people (86%) found this review helpful
105 people found this review funny
Not Recommended
1.8 hrs on record
Posted: December 5, 2015
I ignored the bad reviews because I have fond memories of the early Stronghold games. That was a mistake.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny
Recently Posted
1.6 hrs
Posted: October 27
This game had so much potential. Dont get me wrong the continued story from SH1 is great. I just wish they worked more to fix and optimise this game. ♥♥♥♥ it could've been something great,
Helpful? Yes No Funny
5.1 hrs
Posted: October 22
Unfortantely I have always loved Stronghold however this version is a complete and utter let down :( too many bugs such as troops becoming unresponsive, along with ther poor game play and no skirmish mode, makes this a very boring and disappointing game, unfortantely I can not recommend this to anyone and truely miss when Stronghold used to be a good game when it first game out and even the Crusader ones, I think Stronghold has lost its way sadly and I will not be playing anymore hours on this. Such a shame as I normally love Stronghold.
Helpful? Yes No Funny
9.4 hrs
Posted: October 21
Having no skirmish mode makes this game useless.
Helpful? Yes No Funny
[FDC2] Delta RC-1207
1.5 hrs
Posted: October 16
Honetly i thought stronghold 2 was bad due to the having to keep up with crime rats and gong, but strong hold 3 is worse. I grew up playing strong hold as a kid i loved it, small eco with lots of action. But now its so hard to focus of beating your oppent when having to actully in depth run your castle and estates. Sorry but if i could ide give this game double thumbs down.
Helpful? Yes No Funny
3.1 hrs
Posted: October 8
Utter ♥♥♥♥♥.
Helpful? Yes No Funny
4.2 hrs
Posted: September 30
The game is just overloaded with flaws. The building system is broken because you are very much restricted. Bring back the old building system from SH2 and SHL. Sometimes my soldiers clip into areas or buildings which shouldnt be possible. The night campaign battles are horrible because one great feature of stronghold was that here was no fog of war which is basically the way it should be. I could go on and on just look at the reviews this game is not worth your time
Helpful? Yes No Funny
Xiao Xiao
0.3 hrs
Posted: September 29
it dose not have sckermish so whats the point
Helpful? Yes No Funny
8.2 hrs
Posted: September 28
Nice graphics...... Other than that I'm very disappointed with this game.👎
Helpful? Yes No Funny