Theatre of War 2: Kursk 1943, the historically accurate and detailed real-time tactical war game, welcomes military history fans to the battle which gave the Red Army the strategic initiative for the rest of the war. The new project in the award-winning Theatre of War series depicts the initial (defensive) stage of the Kursk battle.
Användarrecensioner:
Sammanställt:
Blandat (75 recensioner) - 62% av 75 användarrecensioner för det här spelet är positiva.
Utgivningsdatum: 9 mar, 2010

Registrera dig för att lägga till denna artikel i din önskelista eller markera den som inte intresserad.

Köp Theatre of War 2: Kursk 1943

Paket som innehåller detta spel

Köp Theatre of War Collection

Innehåller 6 saker: Theatre of War, Theatre of War 2 - Battle for Caen, Theatre of War 2: Africa 1943, Theatre of War 2: Centauro, Theatre of War 2: Kursk 1943, Theatre of War 3: Korea

Köp World War II Collection by 1C

Innehåller 16 saker: Faces of War, Men of War: Assault Squad, Men of War: Assault Squad - MP Supply Pack Alpha, Men of War: Assault Squad - MP Supply Pack Bravo, Men of War: Assault Squad - MP Supply Pack Charlie, Men of War: Assault Squad - Skirmish Pack, Men of War: Assault Squad - Skirmish Pack 2, Men of War: Condemned Heroes, Men of War: Red Tide, Men of War™, Soldiers: Heroes of World War II, Theatre of War, Theatre of War 2 - Battle for Caen, Theatre of War 2: Africa 1943, Theatre of War 2: Centauro, Theatre of War 2: Kursk 1943

 

Om detta spel

Theatre of War 2: Kursk 1943, the historically accurate and detailed real-time tactical war game, welcomes military history fans to the battle which gave the Red Army the strategic initiative for the rest of the war.
The new project in the award-winning Theatre of War series depicts the initial (defensive) stage of the Kursk battle.

Assuming the role of either the Russian or German battle group commander, acting under direct orders of division commanders Ivan Chistyakov or Valter Hoernlein,
players will control their troops in historical scenarios on precisely reconstructed authentic battlefields.

Five days of July

In Theatre of War 2: Kursk 1943, you control the units of the battle group belonging to German division Grossdeutschland or the forces of the Soviet 67th Guards Rifle Division and 3rd Mechanized Corps,
which participated in the defensive stage of the Kursk battle at the south face of the Kursk salient. There are two campaigns – German and Soviet:
  • Fiery Salient (forces of the Soviet 6th Guards and 1st Tank Army, July 5-10, 1943)
  • Operation Citadel (German division Grossdeutschland Kampfgruppe, July 5-10, 1943)
Each campaign consists of up to 9 engagements and puts you in charge of a typical military unit from that period. Each soldier and officer is a unique personality with characteristics and skills which can change during the campaign.
Careful planning and troops selection is recommended before each engagement.

Key features:
  • Take control over the mighty Soviet or German battle group in one of the battles which changed the history of the world
  • Simulation-level visibility, ballistics and armor penetration systems. All vital vehicle systems and crew members are individually modeled
  • Two historical campaigns (up to 18 missions total) and an unlimited number of customizable engagements waiting to be created with a few mouse clicks using the built-in Mission Generator
  • Sophisticated AI for both enemy and your own units
  • Over 60 Soviet, German and lend-leased US and British player-controllable units (not counting various infantry squads)
  • Unsurpassed management of battle personnel. You can choose, assign, promote and award up to several thousand people with various characteristics. You can even rename units for easier recognition in the heat of battle
  • Team multiplayer for up to 8 players (control of key points or assault/defense) with reinforcements, artillery barrages and air strikes
  • Tools for creating your own missions and maps (built-in Mission Generator, wizard-like Simple Editor, full-blown Mission Editor and 3D Map Editor).

Systemkrav

    Minimum:
    • Operativsystem: Windows XP/Vista
    • Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo eller AMD Athlon64 X2 (2,4GHz eller bättre)
    • Minne: 2GB
    • Grafikkort: NVidia GeForce 6600 eller AMD Radeon X1900 med 256MB RAM eller bättre
    • Ljudkort: DirectX 9-kompatibelt
    • Hårddisk: 3.5GB ledigt hårddiskutrymme
    Rekommenderat:
    • Operativsystem: 64-bit Windows Vista eller Windows 7
    • Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 eller AMD Phenom II X550
    • Minne: 4GB
    • Grafikkort: NVidia GF 8800 eller AMD Radeon HD 4850 med 512MB RAM eller bättre
    • Ljudkort: DirectX 9-kompatibelt
    • Hårddisk: 3.5GB ledigt hårddiskutrymme
Customer reviews
Customer Review system updated! Learn more
Sammanställt:
Blandat (75 recensioner)
Recently Posted
BlackenedPies
( 7.4 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 13 maj
I like this game. It's incredibly detailed and gameplay is good, but it's very buggy and the AI is unreliable. Too often units won't follow orders or hit an insignificant obstacle and cease movement. I also had a performance issue on an older pc where after closing the game CPU usage remains high until restarting. I enjoyed the game and it might be worth buying on sale
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
cameron
( 0.7 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 15 april
only play this if you have an intel cpu. it'll stutter like hot poop if you don't have one - it doesn't play well with amd ones for some bizarre reason.

otherwise, this is a pretty decent real time tactical game. many za rodinus were shouted.
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
GuériO [FR]
( 1.9 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 12 mars
The historical accuaracy is great, but the game is really hard to handle, and it needs time to do so, while in the process I struggle to enjoy my gameplay. The precedent opus was easier. But not better
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
General B.
( 111.0 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 5 mars
Most realistic Tactical game play ever done for WW2, for anyone famaliar with these battles you'll find yourself completely astounded by the detail in this game.
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
seba5227
( 2.0 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 22 december, 2015
♥♥♥♥ game
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
200% Dishonour
( 1.9 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 18 december, 2015
so realisitic and complicated that i have no idea i am doing. 10/10 rubber ducks

also get the dlc so you can get this mod

http://www.battlefront.com/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=314&func=fileinfo&id=932

lets you play as the campaign German Elite Units i cant name them here because they are considered a criminal orginization

if you want to know what forces i mean then click this link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waffen-SS
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
FyreNL
( 1.5 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 28 oktober, 2015
Not what i had expected. Clunky controls, unresponsive units. Game is quite tedious.

I can usually get past that, i don't mind slow and hard-to-learn strategy games. But it's just not responsive nor is it any fun, and frankly, i find the tactical value to be lackluster due to unavailible options for unit behaviour. (infantry only hit the dirt when under fire instead of ordering them to do so before they are under fire, for example) your units also act clunky and units are unresponsive, especially for tank and gun crews, which is my biggest issue. I am well aware that the game creates a somewhat realistic factor by having a delay in orders and units acting sort-of by themselves, but often at times it seems like my soldiers have a death-wish by simply deciding to hit the dirt right in the middle of a killzone, or tanks refusing to turn the right direction when under fire.

There are also a number of more 'hidden' factors in the game, such as morale, but i couldn't find it. Armor and penetration values for guns and ammo also only displayed the moment when i really started searching for them. While ammo penetration and armor resilience are displayed, they are only done so pre-game when assembling forces and in the encyclopedia. If you happen to stumble upon a tank in-game, you're just gonna have to guess or know these statistics beforehand - which is just silly.

The tutorial is practically nonexistant and explains nothing. While that's usually not too much of an issue for me (i dont mind googling, watching YT vids to get my information) it is still frustrating nonetheless.

I do applaud the creators for trying, the genre is kind of a niche and i really enjoy the setting and the armchair-general genre as a whole, but Theatre of War is just one big dissapointment. I recommend avoiding it.

I recommend picking up Men of War: Assault Squad instead. Not only is it more accessible, it's also got far more depth than Theatre of War, along with excellent sound effects, better graphics, immersion, and an active modding/multiplayer community. And most importantly: Unit behaviour and responsiveness works - unlike Theatre of War.
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
Where's UncleSam
( 12.0 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 17 oktober, 2015
slighty good game with large scale maps, silly AI system and flat gameplay
your choice to buy it
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
Lt.Genarel R Baldwin
( 19.0 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 11 oktober, 2015
ALL GOOD
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
alexww180
( 2.1 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 14 juli, 2015
Don't take me wrong. I love rts games and ww2 is my favourite period. I admit most of my games are arcad-ish, but i can take the challlenge of a more realistic game.
I really like the attempt of the game to give realistic engagement ranges (100-400m) unhopefully, they are also the main trouble. However, before you dislike the review and insult my mom in the comments, read mt attempt to make a rational statement:

Infantry was included in a lazy way. Feels like the developers intended a game with tank fights, and included infantry just to make the game look more complete. Infantry is extremely hard to move around, especially compared to similar games.

Recon. Spotting enemy units is extremely hard, fact that becomes worse considering that most of non-recon units are bilnd. This is highly unhistorical, as Tank Commanders were trained to spot from their cupola/hatch and were GOOD at it. Otherwise they would not be tank commanders.

Combat happens at incredibly-long ranges if you are lucky enough to spot the enemy. This almost always makes the battlefield a Chaotic Orgy.

The game also has a somewhat low framerate, maybe it's my pc.

I rate it 4/10

EDIT:about the framerate, i heard that the game has got some severe lacks in coding. It felt weird that i could run Rome 2 and not this honestly.
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
PayMeMoneyNow
( 1.1 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 28 juni, 2015
This is a combat simulation close to realism, tanks are not robots. Research before you buy it
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
SLAYAH
( 0.9 timmar totalt )
Recension av förhandsvisning
Upplagd: 20 juni, 2015
All these in this series suxormundo's. I can't stand real time games I don't know why I bought it. Worst piece of crap in my gaming library.
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
DuTCHRiPPeR
( 2.2 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 21 april, 2015
very good game ,love the graphics,playable by beginners but also for experienced players
got to play this
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
Guetapens
( 2.2 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 21 februari, 2015
for a 5 year old game it looks very good, graphics and animations are all very well done, the UI is intuitive and the front end (menus and options etc) is very slick.

So it's a shame that the gameplay is so dire, it's boring, lifeless and flat.

If you like this type of game take a look at 'Graviteam Tactics Operation Star' for an example of why gameplay matters and it looks at least as good as this, if not better, although be warned - steep learning curve alert ; )
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
headshot26496
( 48.9 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 18 februari, 2015
One of my favorites in this type of wargame. Lots of tactical decisions to make. Use your terrain and cover wisely or you wont last long in this game.
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
loki1944
( 1.0 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 27 januari, 2015
First game was terrible, this is as well. Extremely poor pathfinding AI (which is a biggie for a hardcore strategy game), terrible controls, even convetional zoom is reversed for some reason. AI often will not come close to executing what you tell it to. Runs like crap on good computers. Overall a very, very bad game. And extremely unrealistic armor penetration wise.
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
Balthazar Sleazebaggano
( 24.5 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 8 november, 2014
A good game with really good and clear effort and love behind it, BUT there is one glaring, game breaking problem, and that is the extreme frame rate drop nearly half way through any mission. At times it can drop to about 5 frames a second. It has nothing to do with machine as I run far more demanding games, but rather the poor coding.

Sadly, I cannot recommend this game, but if the concept interests you try out Graviteam Tactics Operation Star. With the uniform mod, that game is not only gorgeous and historically accurate to the T graphics wise, but also the best strategy game on the market.
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
Ganymede IX, Revoker of Titles
( 14.0 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 22 september, 2014
As a sequel I simply can't recommend this game. It seems to take several steps back, and in doing so hits it's head against an open cupboard.

Firstly, there's the issue of why Theatre of War 2 comes in 2 games, each with their own add-ons? The answer to which illudes me completely. The original game had way more content, more nations, and a wider time period. Poland and France have been removed, and Italy and the USA needlessly funnelled off into their own game (which is also suffers from a severe lack of content). The British only have equipment they had at Caen, and not even all of that is present (have you ever heard of the RAF, 1C?). Are we to believe the feed back for the first game was "there's too much stuff, I want less choice"? Obviously it wasn't, so this is another quandery with no real reasoning.

Secondly, there's a grand total of one new mechanic. It's not even pluralisable. Just the one thing that's been added. It's not a terrible one, just poorly executed. The new mechanic is points. You spend points on the task force which you take on missions, and you get points for destroying enemy units. This in and of itself works fine, although knowing what's worth what would be quite nice, as you've no way of knowing in the middle of a battle (or in the menus for that matter). The only real downside is that your support now costs points. So you need at least 3000 points before you can call in artillery. Given that the average tank kill gets you about 400~ points, you need to wipe out roughly an entire battalion of tanks before High Command decide the situation looks a little hairy, and grant you off-map arty support. I'm not sure why this change was made, as artillery and air support were finite resources anyway, so you could quite easily blow it all on a not-so-serious attack and only realise later there's still another 300 dudes to kill, and your 6 remaining shells probably won't do the trick.

These are just the starkest of the games faults. There's so many little things going wrong as well, from unforgivably bad sound design (Brits speaking in American voices and the generally empty feel of the soundtrackless battles (the music slider is actually greyed out but left in)), all the way to awkward, but sadly compulsary, infantry micro-management (I shouldn't have to manually give my MG ammo while I want to be flanking a Tiger with my SU-85). It's just so frustrating to have a beautifully rendered WW2 battlefield, and then feel consricted and fustrated by mechanics of the game.

Wait, why am I spending 3 paragraphs moaning about a 4 year old game nobody even plays? Perhaps I'm passionate about the subject? Or just unemployed?

It's the second one. Hey 1C, give me a gig as a play tester you f**king hacks!
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
Jimbread
( 0.5 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 15 september, 2014
This game doesn't ♥♥♥♥ing work, where is my money.
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
71st_AH_Mastiff
( 12.4 timmar totalt )
Upplagd: 5 september, 2014
great game for us RTS gamers.
Helpful? Ja Nej Rolig
Most Helpful Reviews  In the past 90 days
7 av 8 personer (88%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
Rekommenderas
111.0 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 5 mars
Most realistic Tactical game play ever done for WW2, for anyone famaliar with these battles you'll find yourself completely astounded by the detail in this game.
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
Most Helpful Reviews  In the past 180 days
8 av 12 personer (67%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
2 tyckte att den här recensionen var rolig
Rekommenderas
1.9 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 18 december, 2015
so realisitic and complicated that i have no idea i am doing. 10/10 rubber ducks

also get the dlc so you can get this mod

http://www.battlefront.com/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=314&func=fileinfo&id=932

lets you play as the campaign German Elite Units i cant name them here because they are considered a criminal orginization

if you want to know what forces i mean then click this link

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waffen-SS
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
Most Helpful Reviews  Overall
36 av 39 personer (92%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
Rekommenderas
40.6 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 30 december, 2011
After playing through non-steam versions of Theatre of War 2 (Africa, Kursk, Battle for Caen) and Theatre of War 3: Korea I purchased the steam versions as well (during sale).
IMHO, this is not just another WW2 tactical game, it is the MOST REALISTIC simulator of company-level battles of 1943-1951 warfare!
Not easy to master for everyone who is used to "select'em all -> send'em all!" tactics! Every shell and armor interaction follows real physics laws, every unit moves are done in the real scale (time and distances), all battles are very intense and make you feel that this is how it was for real!
Every wargamer eager for WW2 realism must try at least!
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
24 av 29 personer (83%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
Rekommenderas
13.9 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 7 juli, 2014
Great game!....Released in 2010 and still better than most CM today. A must to experience for people loving than genre!....It is realistic and historically accurate, what is there to dislike?....
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
15 av 20 personer (75%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
Rekommenderas
167.7 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 12 mars, 2014
game looks great and gets very intense
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
20 av 32 personer (63%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
Rekommenderas inte
24.5 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 8 november, 2014
A good game with really good and clear effort and love behind it, BUT there is one glaring, game breaking problem, and that is the extreme frame rate drop nearly half way through any mission. At times it can drop to about 5 frames a second. It has nothing to do with machine as I run far more demanding games, but rather the poor coding.

Sadly, I cannot recommend this game, but if the concept interests you try out Graviteam Tactics Operation Star. With the uniform mod, that game is not only gorgeous and historically accurate to the T graphics wise, but also the best strategy game on the market.
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
8 av 10 personer (80%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
Rekommenderas
24.8 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 27 december, 2011
Overall, ToW games shine in armor combat. Each crew member is individually modeled and they depend on each other. Each projectile is calculated individually, including it's path after penetrating the armor. Secondary fragmentation, shell stability, interior equipment damage, this kind of things (and in Kursk and later games you can turn on hit vectors display mode that visually shows you detailed info - hit angles, caliber, penetrations...).

Moreover, starting from Africa ALL vehicles have historically correct view ports, so if a MG gunner is killed noone will be using his view slits and tank will become blind from the right side. This is not all. A crew member can use only one view point at a time, so if a commander is busy assigning targets appearing from the front to a gunner, he may not notice targets from behind (and noone else in the tank can watch behind).

Well, you get the idea:)
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
6 av 7 personer (86%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
1 person tyckte att den här recensionen var rolig
Rekommenderas
12.0 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 17 oktober, 2015
slighty good game with large scale maps, silly AI system and flat gameplay
your choice to buy it
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
13 av 21 personer (62%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
Rekommenderas inte
1.5 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 28 oktober, 2015
Not what i had expected. Clunky controls, unresponsive units. Game is quite tedious.

I can usually get past that, i don't mind slow and hard-to-learn strategy games. But it's just not responsive nor is it any fun, and frankly, i find the tactical value to be lackluster due to unavailible options for unit behaviour. (infantry only hit the dirt when under fire instead of ordering them to do so before they are under fire, for example) your units also act clunky and units are unresponsive, especially for tank and gun crews, which is my biggest issue. I am well aware that the game creates a somewhat realistic factor by having a delay in orders and units acting sort-of by themselves, but often at times it seems like my soldiers have a death-wish by simply deciding to hit the dirt right in the middle of a killzone, or tanks refusing to turn the right direction when under fire.

There are also a number of more 'hidden' factors in the game, such as morale, but i couldn't find it. Armor and penetration values for guns and ammo also only displayed the moment when i really started searching for them. While ammo penetration and armor resilience are displayed, they are only done so pre-game when assembling forces and in the encyclopedia. If you happen to stumble upon a tank in-game, you're just gonna have to guess or know these statistics beforehand - which is just silly.

The tutorial is practically nonexistant and explains nothing. While that's usually not too much of an issue for me (i dont mind googling, watching YT vids to get my information) it is still frustrating nonetheless.

I do applaud the creators for trying, the genre is kind of a niche and i really enjoy the setting and the armchair-general genre as a whole, but Theatre of War is just one big dissapointment. I recommend avoiding it.

I recommend picking up Men of War: Assault Squad instead. Not only is it more accessible, it's also got far more depth than Theatre of War, along with excellent sound effects, better graphics, immersion, and an active modding/multiplayer community. And most importantly: Unit behaviour and responsiveness works - unlike Theatre of War.
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
7 av 12 personer (58%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
2 tyckte att den här recensionen var rolig
Rekommenderas inte
2.1 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 14 juli, 2015
Don't take me wrong. I love rts games and ww2 is my favourite period. I admit most of my games are arcad-ish, but i can take the challlenge of a more realistic game.
I really like the attempt of the game to give realistic engagement ranges (100-400m) unhopefully, they are also the main trouble. However, before you dislike the review and insult my mom in the comments, read mt attempt to make a rational statement:

Infantry was included in a lazy way. Feels like the developers intended a game with tank fights, and included infantry just to make the game look more complete. Infantry is extremely hard to move around, especially compared to similar games.

Recon. Spotting enemy units is extremely hard, fact that becomes worse considering that most of non-recon units are bilnd. This is highly unhistorical, as Tank Commanders were trained to spot from their cupola/hatch and were GOOD at it. Otherwise they would not be tank commanders.

Combat happens at incredibly-long ranges if you are lucky enough to spot the enemy. This almost always makes the battlefield a Chaotic Orgy.

The game also has a somewhat low framerate, maybe it's my pc.

I rate it 4/10

EDIT:about the framerate, i heard that the game has got some severe lacks in coding. It felt weird that i could run Rome 2 and not this honestly.
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
12 av 22 personer (55%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
4 tyckte att den här recensionen var rolig
Rekommenderas inte
14.0 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 22 september, 2014
As a sequel I simply can't recommend this game. It seems to take several steps back, and in doing so hits it's head against an open cupboard.

Firstly, there's the issue of why Theatre of War 2 comes in 2 games, each with their own add-ons? The answer to which illudes me completely. The original game had way more content, more nations, and a wider time period. Poland and France have been removed, and Italy and the USA needlessly funnelled off into their own game (which is also suffers from a severe lack of content). The British only have equipment they had at Caen, and not even all of that is present (have you ever heard of the RAF, 1C?). Are we to believe the feed back for the first game was "there's too much stuff, I want less choice"? Obviously it wasn't, so this is another quandery with no real reasoning.

Secondly, there's a grand total of one new mechanic. It's not even pluralisable. Just the one thing that's been added. It's not a terrible one, just poorly executed. The new mechanic is points. You spend points on the task force which you take on missions, and you get points for destroying enemy units. This in and of itself works fine, although knowing what's worth what would be quite nice, as you've no way of knowing in the middle of a battle (or in the menus for that matter). The only real downside is that your support now costs points. So you need at least 3000 points before you can call in artillery. Given that the average tank kill gets you about 400~ points, you need to wipe out roughly an entire battalion of tanks before High Command decide the situation looks a little hairy, and grant you off-map arty support. I'm not sure why this change was made, as artillery and air support were finite resources anyway, so you could quite easily blow it all on a not-so-serious attack and only realise later there's still another 300 dudes to kill, and your 6 remaining shells probably won't do the trick.

These are just the starkest of the games faults. There's so many little things going wrong as well, from unforgivably bad sound design (Brits speaking in American voices and the generally empty feel of the soundtrackless battles (the music slider is actually greyed out but left in)), all the way to awkward, but sadly compulsary, infantry micro-management (I shouldn't have to manually give my MG ammo while I want to be flanking a Tiger with my SU-85). It's just so frustrating to have a beautifully rendered WW2 battlefield, and then feel consricted and fustrated by mechanics of the game.

Wait, why am I spending 3 paragraphs moaning about a 4 year old game nobody even plays? Perhaps I'm passionate about the subject? Or just unemployed?

It's the second one. Hey 1C, give me a gig as a play tester you f**king hacks!
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
6 av 11 personer (55%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
1 person tyckte att den här recensionen var rolig
Rekommenderas inte
2.2 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 21 februari, 2015
for a 5 year old game it looks very good, graphics and animations are all very well done, the UI is intuitive and the front end (menus and options etc) is very slick.

So it's a shame that the gameplay is so dire, it's boring, lifeless and flat.

If you like this type of game take a look at 'Graviteam Tactics Operation Star' for an example of why gameplay matters and it looks at least as good as this, if not better, although be warned - steep learning curve alert ; )
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
1 av 2 personer (50%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
Rekommenderas
1.1 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 28 juni, 2015
This is a combat simulation close to realism, tanks are not robots. Research before you buy it
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
1 av 2 personer (50%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
5 av 11 personer (45%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
Rekommenderas
12.4 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 5 september, 2014
great game for us RTS gamers.
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
5 av 11 personer (45%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
2 tyckte att den här recensionen var rolig
Rekommenderas
2.8 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 7 april, 2013
Glitchy 7/10
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
4 av 9 personer (44%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
1 person tyckte att den här recensionen var rolig
Rekommenderas inte
1.0 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 27 januari, 2015
First game was terrible, this is as well. Extremely poor pathfinding AI (which is a biggie for a hardcore strategy game), terrible controls, even convetional zoom is reversed for some reason. AI often will not come close to executing what you tell it to. Runs like crap on good computers. Overall a very, very bad game. And extremely unrealistic armor penetration wise.
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
1 av 3 personer (33%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
1 person tyckte att den här recensionen var rolig
Rekommenderas inte
1.9 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 12 mars
The historical accuaracy is great, but the game is really hard to handle, and it needs time to do so, while in the process I struggle to enjoy my gameplay. The precedent opus was easier. But not better
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
3 av 8 personer (38%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
Rekommenderas
9.5 timmar totalt
Recension av förhandsvisning
Upplagd: 14 januari, 2011
really good but needs more action 7.5/10
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig
6 av 16 personer (38%) fann denna recension hjälpsam
1 person tyckte att den här recensionen var rolig
Rekommenderas inte
0.5 timmar totalt
Upplagd: 15 september, 2014
This game doesn't ♥♥♥♥ing work, where is my money.
Var denna recension hjälpsam? Ja Nej Rolig