First, I should apologize and explain some details about my text from couple days a go. I am sorry if you felt rude. I was little upset. and I am 'really' bad at writing and english.
This free-demo, in my guess, has narrative of frame unlikely priced main game has. It could be cool and respectable for making this demo more valuable, but I felt unilateral in many part. As I said before.
This demo's many contents doesn't based on convincing player. From first choice, there isn't enough information. Player should choose a person boss talking about now. Dead person or a person who hired by player character. What should I choose? Too different and I don't know both person demo talks from first. Only this, isn't big problem. But dialogue without convincing is going on until demo end.
Next you move to a building to get information about a game for writing. There is many man scoring the game and staff characters. The character player controls made a contradiction unnaturally to a man criticize. Staff characters talks. explain random character creation differ from main game or something... I read all dialogues, I tried to play real demo content from main game.
Random created player character was a skinny black male. Lover character was a huge guy. Appearance is random, but you must make name of both character. No default names. What's this? I didn't imagine something like this. Maybe some male could falling in love with a giant guy, me and many male can't. If want to make people understand, explanation should be exist before.
I ended session as quickly as possible. and tried to restart character making session in demo, but unabled. Should I retry demo game from the first until made main characters I can immerse in? This is only demo that doesn't have reason to play many time. doesn't useful to enjoy main game. Why I should do? This isn't nitpicky at all.
At last part, the character player controls in demo scoring about the game. 1 to 4. Scored by player's choice.
First, graphic. I prefer 2D in many game but I felt this game's graphic is not so bad but not above average. I scored 2. If it was 1 to 5 system, I scored 3. Second, sound. I felt same like graphic, scored 2. I can't remmember what third is. I didn't understand at that time I played. Character also said like that. I scored 3 since I can't criticize I don't know. Third one was last one. of course this demo doesn't give any information what and how many entry exist before choice.
Last scene of this demo game is staff character's talk. Complain about consequence brought on by scoring 2. At that time I knew 1 to 4 scoring system was on purpose.
I read some Steam reviews about priced main game before release of this demo. Some reviews said something like cameo staff character appears too much and not enough reason to chase former lover.
Many disapproval between player and staff exist around this game. I felt too. Not enough dialogue or something to sympathize player get immersed in a game. Even in a short play demo.
I played many dialogue focused games from 20th century. and I am not a person who feel pleasure from blame something or somebody. I don't like scoring games at least 1 to 10. But this game is too one-sided. I felt this demo game really was. Too unilateral in many part.
Maybe my words isn't useful enough for you. This demo is free, y'know. You can try it any time. But I don't think this demo is pretty well designed at least as an introduction of priced main game. My memory about this game will stay bad quite a while.