Aggression is a military real-time strategy game set within a historic context featuring role-playing elements. Play the role of a political leader of Russia, Great Britain, France or Germany. It is up to you to take firm decisions at the crucial period of the European history – the World Wars ages covering 1914 – 1945.
บทวิจารณ์จากผู้ใช้: ผสมกัน (30 บทวิจารณ์)
วันที่วางจำหน่าย: 10 พ.ค. 2007

เข้าสู่ระบบ เพื่อเพิ่มเกมนี้ลงในสิ่งที่อยากได้ของคุณ หรือทำเครื่องหมายเป็น ยังไม่สนใจ



Aggression is a military real-time strategy game set within a historic context featuring role-playing elements. Play the role of a political leader of Russia, Great Britain, France or Germany. It is up to you to take firm decisions at the crucial period of the European history – the World Wars ages covering 1914 – 1945.
The main feature of the game is a holistic approach to the state administration model. The player is controlling political, economic, technological and military spheres, which contributes to creating an atmosphere of ruling an actual country. Despite the extensive range of possibilities, the process of state administration in Aggression remains rather simple and easy to master. The majority of game aspects allow for flexible settings, thus giving the player a chance to set a desirable control level or choose the auto-control mode. Every choice made change the situation and the final result of how the world would end up after each war period and even what would happen between them.

Features List

Try out the true military strategy game that spans the period of 1910-1950.
Play by over 200 historical characters featuring the great names of history. Among them are political leaders, generals and public figures that lived during the period.
Participate in historical campaigns featuring hundreds of tasks. You can play as a leader of any of the four key countries, guide your nation through the entire World War age and take part in both of the World Wars.
Make your own choices and change global political strategy. You have an opportunity to set an alternative course of events in the European history.
Act on behalf of one of four countries available: Russia, Great Britain, Germany, France.
Control political, economic and military systems, influencing on the European political and military policies in the 20th century.
Be in the center of bloody battles, military operations planning, make new weaponry and technology research (from machine-guns to nuclear bombs), form political alliances and espionage.
Fight in major battles on 92 three-dimensional tactical maps.
Feel and experience the classical game graphics of the best in strategic genre, true-to-life physics, a large variety of special effects that contribute to the cinematic picture of all what's happening on the screen.


    • OS: XP/Vista/7/8
    • Processor: Pentium 4/Athlon XP 1.7 GHz
    • Memory: 1 GB RAM
    • Graphics: Video 128 MB RAM
    • Hard Drive: 3 GB available space
    • OS: XP/Vista/7/8
    • Processor: Pentium 4/Athlon 64 3 GHz
    • Memory: 2 GB RAM
    • Graphics: Video 256 MB RAM
    • Hard Drive: 3 GB available space
7 จาก 10 คน (70%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
1 คน เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้ชวนขำขัน
2.0 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 11 ตุลาคม 2014
Do you want to manage surprisingly-sparse resources with unfriendly and broken menus over a time period that covers 2 world wars? If yes, you might enjoy this game. I've heard a great deal about Aggression's depth, and even with my limited playtime I managed to experience some of it.

However, to say Aggression is an unfriendly game is an understatement. While not the buggiest game I've played, Aggression is prone to crashes. The tutorial is easily broken, but this is actually due to poor design rather than poor code. Multitudes of information windows are lacking important information or hold no information at all. In game objectives suffer from the same bad design as the tutorial, ensuring they are far too easy to fail (if you don't have, say, an exact number of troops exactly close enough to reach an out of the way area of the map by a very short deadline).

I don't usually play large-scale strategy games, so perhaps when I say resources were uncomfortably limited I mean that it would take an expert or a person willing to fail over and over to really learn the ins and outs. I never had enough resources to feel comfortable with the economy, and I set all of my cities to auto-construct to compensate. Unfortunately, if your not invading or managing your cities, you really don't have much to do beside moving your ministers around (your ministers effectively being agents of your will). The most interesting part of the game is therefore management, but as I said many features and windows are either poorly explained or missing information completely, so you really have to research outside the game to figure out what it all means.

Combat is the weakest point of Aggression. The AI is some of the worst I've ever seen, and while the enemy can usually figure out how to kill you, your own units will struggle simply to follow your orders without getting slaughtered or running in front of tanks. This means that the second game mode, "Missions," which consists only of combat, is entirely a waste of time. the campaign mode, the only real mode, features an auto-resolve button that should be used unless you're confident of overwhelming superiority or have put in the time to figure out how to abuse the system.

Not fun and not worth it, even on sale.
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
35 จาก 42 คน (83%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
1 คน เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้ชวนขำขัน
2.4 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 10 เมษายน 2014
while i don't have much time on the game yet, it has been one of the best RTSs i have ever played, it has a unique mix of Paradox's Real Time overworld map and the RTS elements of the battles, of course there are a few bugs of course, but no more than any large scale game like this. The lack of Navel combat is kind of annoying, but they make up for it with a large roster of ground units, everything from pre-World War I infantry to post- World War II fighters. i highly reccomend this game with a 9.5/10. I wonder how this game slipped under my radar
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
30 จาก 38 คน (79%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
1 คน เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้ชวนขำขัน
14.1 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 9 เมษายน 2014
Agression Europe under fire makse for a very fun and interesting game overall. IT has a complex yet fairly easy to use Nation management system and this is what makes up the bulk of the gameplay. There is also a decently basic RTS styled fighting system where you can watch buildings blow up in graphical detail and lead your tanks and infantry to vicotry! This is an interesting feature beacuse it easily breaches the gap for gamers who cant play Risk styled map games without a little bit of breakup with action, Like myself/

This game takes place in a period of history very rarely displayed in video games and i think this is will the core audience will come from. it goes from 1910 to 1950 yes thats right you can be france in ww1 and ww2!!! omg ft 17 renaults and Schneider tanks and sweet sweet interwar period vehicles.

In conclusion you will feel like the master of your nation during one of its most interesting periods of history. History buffs will love it tread heads will aprechaite it and strategy gamers will add it to there collction. Lead your nation to glory through ww1 and ww2 for $9.99
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
16 จาก 21 คน (76%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
15.6 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 11 เมษายน 2014
The game in strategic view is good and research too but in tactical battle pathfinding is like catastrophic some guys in a squad cannot reach destination and the autoresolve kill a lot of your unit so i recommand to go through tactical battle even if it's bad.
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
12 จาก 14 คน (86%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
13.1 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 17 เมษายน 2014
Wide variety of units to use.
Explosions feel and look good. (In other words, it doesn't look like a fire cracker went off when a artillery shell hits a surface.)
Pretty good destruction Physics.
Covers both World War One and Two Warfare, so it caters to both interests. (Refreshing concept I have to say.)
Detailed animations on units.

Limited soundtrack. (It's good but needs more variety.)
Some bugs, typos, etc. (But nothing really new from what I see in other big games like this.)
Occasional wonky AI. (Although that isn't really a new problem in the Strategy genre.)
Tutorial covers only one portion of the game. (The battling portion of the game isn't too hard to understand. But it would be nice to have an explanation on what to do.)

Overall, despite the flaws Aggression has, it is still a fun RTS to play. Theres a huge amount of content in this game, so for ten bucks you can't really go wrong.

บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
7 จาก 8 คน (88%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
20.3 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 25 กรกฎาคม 2014
i actually like this game, because the gameplay reminds me of war leaders: clash of nations but with older era and only cover europe instead of whole world, but i still like it! the thing i like the most maybe the name of the cabinet men, all realistic name and unknown to me is there, tho they must be connected to WW1 events.
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
14 จาก 23 คน (61%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
7.5 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 12 เมษายน 2014
what is the game about?
you play as one of 4 countries (russia, france, germany, britain) in europe between 1910-1945. You play on a strategic map, where you can build units and buildings, manage your cities and population and explore technologies, which range from the first to the end of the second world war.
Except for the strategic map, there is also a tactical battlefield, in which you battle your enemy in real time, whenever you encounter an enemy army or city. it is like a (simple) total war game. there is also a littlebit of roleplaying too, for there are some important characters, with different abilities and professions, which you can send over the map and improve their skills/choose new ones.

+: old, but nice and very detailed grafic,
nice atmosphere (f.e. animals that roam through the map;)
good effects, like bombing explosions and crushing buldings;
good strategic map/part
wide verarity of units
the first world war is a refreshing experience, also to see a game which combines the first and the second world war.

-: very annoying tactical part/rts battles:
very bad pathfinding, no formations, if you select more than one unit (even if they all are of the same type) you cant use any of the special order buttons; the game sometimes doesnt seem to recognize your orders/mouseclicks from time to time; it might happend that you suffer an unexpected fps drop; there is a bug in which your units sometimes cant leave buildings anymore; it happend to me that my infantry suddenly couldnt jump over fences anymore (4 of my squads where trapped in a garden, thanks of this -_-), the battle AI is quiet stupid, it will seperate its army and sending troops to every single flag/conquere area and than doing nothing but standing arround;
also: boring and old soundtrack
bad tutorial (it only explains the strategic map part, nothing about the tactical battles, where you have to learn on your own some very important key functions, like different units, special orders, ammunition, etc.)
no multiplayer
only limited singleplayer = only main campaign and 5 scenarios; no editor, no skirmish battles; you cant modify the scenarios or campaign in any way. (f.e. you cant choose a different start date, etc)
very limited diplomacy = war/neutral/allied, and a tradeagreement
you can only play russia, france, england and germany, althought there are spain, austria, italy and the ottman empire as mayor powers, you are not allowed to play them.

while the strategic part of the game is really enjoyable, the tactical part is quiet annoying, with all its bugs and the stupid AI. althought i like the idea, and the love for detail, i cant recommend this game.
also, since this is allready a pretty old game and i didnt find any patch, it is unlikely that there will be one in the future.
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
17 จาก 31 คน (55%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
7.3 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 10 เมษายน 2014
Ok, really wanted to like this game, love the concept. On the strategic map its not to bad, but once you go tactical the game is really hampered by the horrible pathfinding and the constant crashes. So unless you want to autosolve all the battles, this one may not be for you
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
2 จาก 5 คน (40%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
1 คน เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้ชวนขำขัน
0.9 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 3 ตุลาคม 2014
It's like Knights of Honor; but in WW1-2, so yes this game is worth a campgain or 7.
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
0 จาก 1 คน (0%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
0.3 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 13 กุมภาพันธ์
WW1 Total War-style? Sign me up, now!!! That's what I thought in 2008 when I first heard of the game. A demo soon followed and my interest immediately crashed and burned.
Recently I accidentally saw it in the steam trade-in special and got it for free. Well, not much changed since 2008.
The game is just a mess and extremely badly designed. The real-time battles are the worst part.
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
0 จาก 2 คน (0%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
0.1 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 2 มกราคม
the info on the page are totally false and the the game not working at all
(i have all above recommended spec)
the game name is supose to be Aggression Reign over Europe
not Aggression europe under fire (Aggression europe under fire is not on official website...)
release date set to 2007 it also false
(official devloper website proof)

the game was supose to be at v1.27
this one is at v1.0
(my friend had the good version...but i cant find it anymore on the steam page)
(maybe a maintenance error)

steam had give me a refund for this game...
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
6 จาก 15 คน (40%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
1 คน เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้ชวนขำขัน
32.1 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 27 สิงหาคม 2014
Frequent crashes in the middle of long battles. No thanks.
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
2 จาก 7 คน (29%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
1.1 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 26 ตุลาคม 2014
Recruiting a squad of infantry (4-6 men in the battlefield) takes 2k population. Natural selection at its finest, what the game doesn't tell you is that the 1994 other men were killed in the process of training the 6 elite units in the squad.
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
1 จาก 5 คน (20%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
1.4 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 24 พฤศจิกายน 2014
Extrememly disappointed, nothing like how it is in the video
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
2 จาก 10 คน (20%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
0.6 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 21 มิถุนายน 2014
Lousy. The RTS Tactical battles feel like it was programmed in the 1980s. Poor Camera Control, Poor animations, LAUGHABLE quality. The main map portion of the game is not intuitive and you stare at it wondering what to even do. The random missions dont give you enough time to even complete them. for example "research X within 3 weeks them build y number of Z within the same time period" turns out to have a research requirement of 19 weeks.

this was a total waste of $5.99 fo rme and a total waste of the programmer's time to make this POS.
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน
1 จาก 17 คน (6%) เห็นว่าบทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์
2.4 ชม. ในบันทึก
โพสต์: 26 พฤษภาคม 2014
sadly this is crap
บทวิจารณ์นี้มีประโยชน์หรือไม่? ใช่ ไม่ ขำขัน