Call of Duty® 把第二次世界大戰帶上螢幕,逼真而同時展現電影般的緊湊節奏,突破以往表現,讓您透過小兵的觀點,無名英雄的雙眼,見證戰場的猛烈,參與多國聯盟,一起塑造現代歷史的發展。 扮演訓練精良的小隊成員,在戰場的混亂裡佈下支援火網,後送受傷同袍。 遊戲中除了逼真的小隊動作與戰術,戰場上還可以看到每一名士兵的個性和訓練成果。 戰爭不是靠單一名士兵或單一個國家贏得的。 Call of Duty® 是首次以多個觀點描繪大戰,包括了美國、英國、蘇聯的士兵。 執行 24 個任務,體驗共 4 個互相關聯的歷史性戰役。 任務目標多變,包括破壞、全面突襲、匿蹤、載具戰鬥和救援任務。 逼真的武器、地點、載具和音效,一切都更加提升擬真度,讓您享受至今最極致的二次世界大戰體驗。
使用者評論: 壓倒性好評 (518 篇評論)
發售日: 2003 年 10 月 29 日

登入以新增此項目至您的願望清單、追隨或是標記為無興趣

購買 Call of Duty

包含此遊戲的合集

購買 Call of Duty Warchest

包含 3 個項目: Call of Duty, Call of Duty: United Offensive, Call of Duty® 2

購買 Call of Duty World War II Bundle (ROW)

包含 4 個項目: Call of Duty, Call of Duty: United Offensive, Call of Duty: World at War, Call of Duty® 2

購買 Call of Duty Definitive Collection

Includes 113 items! Click 'Package info' for details.

 

關於此遊戲

Call of Duty® 把第二次世界大戰帶上螢幕,逼真而同時展現電影般的緊湊節奏,突破以往表現,讓您透過小兵的觀點,無名英雄的雙眼,見證戰場的猛烈,參與多國聯盟,一起塑造現代歷史的發展。
扮演訓練精良的小隊成員,在戰場的混亂裡佈下支援火網,後送受傷同袍。 遊戲中除了逼真的小隊動作與戰術,戰場上還可以看到每一名士兵的個性和訓練成果。
戰爭不是靠單一名士兵或單一個國家贏得的。 Call of Duty® 是首次以多個觀點描繪大戰,包括了美國、英國、蘇聯的士兵。 執行 24 個任務,體驗共 4 個互相關聯的歷史性戰役。 任務目標多變,包括破壞、全面突襲、匿蹤、載具戰鬥和救援任務。 逼真的武器、地點、載具和音效,一切都更加提升擬真度,讓您享受至今最極致的二次世界大戰體驗。


© 2006 Activision Publishing, Inc. Activision 及 Call of Duty 為 Activision Publishing, Inc. 的註冊商標。所有權利均予保留。 所有其他商標及商品名稱皆為各自所有權人之財產。

系統需求

    最低:3D 硬體加速卡 (必備) - 100% DirectX 9.0b 相容、具備硬體 T&L 能力的 32MB 顯示卡和最新驅動程式*,英文版 Microsoft Windows 98/ME/2000/XP,Pentium III 600MHz 或 Athlon 600MHz 處理器或更高級的系統配備 (Windows 98/ME),Pentium III 700MHz 或 Athlon 700MHz 處理緝獲更高級的系統配備 (Windows 2000/XP),128MB RAM,1.4GB 未壓縮可用硬碟空間 (加 400MB 供 Windows 98/ME 分頁檔使用,600MB 供 Windows 2000/XP 分頁檔使用),100% DirectX 9.0b 相容 16 位元音效卡及最新驅動程式,100% Windows 98/ME/2000/XP 相容滑鼠、鍵盤及最新驅動程式,DirectX 9.0b (隨附)
    多人遊戲需求:
    • 支援網際網路 (TCP/IP) 及區域網路 (LAN TCP/IP)
    • 網際網路遊戲需要 56kbps (或更高速) 數據機及最新驅動程式
    • 區域網路遊戲需要網路介面卡及最新驅動程式
    重要:*部份 3D 加速卡雖使用此處列出的晶片組,卻不一定能相容 Call of Duty 所使用的 3D 加速功能。 請洽詢您的硬體製造商是否 100% 相容 DirectX 9.0b。
    支援的晶片組
    • 所有 ATI Radeon 顯示卡
    • 所有 nVidia GeForce 顯示卡
    • Matrox Parhelia
值得參考的用戶評論
97 人之中有 94 人(97%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 4 位使用者認為這則評論很有趣
6.1 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 19 日
Call of Duty is very different from modern Call of Duty games. It doesn't have regenerating health, it has a different game engine, combat flows differently, and you are a regular soldier, not a super soldier or super agent.

The campaign follows three nations battle against the Third Reich and their constantly growing military. You play as Americans, British and Russian soldiers in different battles against different groups of the massive Nazi Army. As the American solider, you are fighting in France in a desperate battle to claim land and villages from the Nazi's, as the British, you go from standard soldier to SAS agent, and as a Russian soldier, you start as a lowly conscript and end as a senior soldier. In the campaign, you never feel invincible, and unlike modern Call of Duty games, you will almost always have a large amount of soldiers with you, rather than going alone or with a single invincible commanding officer. This doesn't make the game easier however, the lack of regenerating health means that it is unwise to carelessly move, especially on higher difficulties where having low health and no health kits for another mile can make the games campaign brutally difficult.

The soundtrack is a high-point for the game as well, with memorable themes. The voice acting is far from modern Call of Duty's Hollywood voice acting, but then again, it can stand with it as an equal because nearly all the Call of Duty games have bad voice acting (minus Kevin Spacey, he was the best part of Advanced Warfare of course!). The sound effects hold up to players because they were re-used for several more games, and as they stand, they aren't exactly low-quality.

Visually, the game has aged since release, with odd faces, bad animations and low-resolution environment textures. The gun models are noticeably lower detail compared to Call of Duty 2's models as well. Despite this, the visuals only get in the way if you decide to only focus on them. The engine is clearly quite old, but the game runs well on modern computers for most of the time. The only real annoyance is the lack of support for most resolutions, meaning that .cfg configurations are needed to run in resolutions such as 1920x1080.

Despite its problems, Call of Duty still stands as one of the best in the series, the game may be visually aged, it may lack the narrative focus of later games, but it stands taller because it focuses more on spectacular battles and large set pieces instead of plot and the excessive use of QTE's. I ultimately recommend this game to anyone who loves Call of Duty to see how the series should be done, and lovers of the genre as Call of Duty, and its expansion pack, United Offensive make the best the series. A stellar game, and a brilliant starting point for a series that has unfortunately lost its way.

Overall: 9
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
98 人之中有 87 人(89%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
9.0 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 11 日
The one good Call of duty game. 10/10
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
75 人之中有 67 人(89%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
6.4 記錄時數
張貼於:05 月 9 日
it's a 2003 game but it stills better than Advanced Warfare an the others COD games
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
8 人之中有 8 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
23.7 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 13 日
I played this game a long time ago, when I was just a kid. I gave it another try now, and I'm not disappointed, its still very good. Of course, the graphics are super old so nothing really nice from this point but the gameplay is still very good and enjoyable.
I forgot how hard was the Veteran dificulty in this one (newer COD's are largely easier) and it's very hard indeed.
Besides some AI nonsense, some glitch there and there, and some absurdly hard to find objectives the game is still very good.
I can only recommend, if you are not into games for the graphics, you will enjoy.

The only downside for now is the price. 20€ is really too much, it should be sold around 5 considering its age.
That said, you can get the WWII bundle and that makes it a little cheaper (still too much imho), or just wait for a deal and its all good.
I wish they would price old games sensibly because it only encourage to get it somewhere else...
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣
6 人之中有 6 人(100%)認為這篇評論值得參考
有 1 位使用者對這則評論感到有趣
1.4 記錄時數
張貼於:02 月 21 日
I say it's good graphics for it's time and it has a good story line but the controls are a litlle off other than that great game
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 有趣