Actual Armies. Actual Weapons. Actual Political Issues. World War III - Black Gold takes the player to the near future. The political crisis has been going on for months, leading to worldwide turmoil. A secret conference of the UN Central Geological Commission reveals that worldwide oil reserves have reached dangerously low levels: Oil...
使用者評論: 褒貶不一 (52 篇評論)
發售日: 2001 年 10 月 16 日


購買 World War III: Black Gold



“Political climate aside, this is a great game. It is well designed and features great replay ability.”
90 – Gamer's Pulse

“Black Gold's combination of intense real-time action, gorgeous graphics, and streamlined play make this one of the best real-time strategy games of 2001.”
85 – GameSpy

“It's an all-around great real-time strategy game that also happens to stand out from other games in the genre.”
84 – GameSpot


Actual Armies. Actual Weapons. Actual Political Issues.

World War III - Black Gold takes the player to the near future. The political crisis has been going on for months, leading to worldwide turmoil. A secret conference of the UN Central Geological Commission reveals that worldwide oil reserves have reached dangerously low levels: Oil reserves will run out within 8-10 years. This proves too short for even the most highly industrialized countries to switch their economies to alternative energy sources. Soon, mass protests erupt all over the world, effectively shutting down the global economy. The Great Powers have declared WW III...


  • 2 Game modes: for beginners and experts
  • 3 Campaigns on three sites: the US, Russia and Iraq in 30 epic missions of courage and honour
  • Fully 3D war terrain and units
  • Day/night cycles and variable weather conditions affect the game and your strategies
  • "Technology Tree" weapons research system
  • Tunnels, trenches and interconnected underground tunnel systems)
  • Ability to modify the 3D terrain (flattens terrain, create bulwarks or dig ditches)
  • Advanced electronic battle systems: communications tapping, photo stream capturing
  • Kamikaze and Stealth-units
  • Camouflage and Jamming systems
  • Defence systems: missile defence, decoys, anti-chemical filters
  • Anti-aircraft, anti-tank, mass destruction weapons
  • Challenging Multitplayer-Mode for up to 8 players over LAN & EarthNet


    • OS: Windows XP / Vista / 7 / 8
    • Processor: Intel/AMD Singlecore CPU
    • Memory: 512 MB RAM
    • Graphics: 3D with DirectX support and 64 MB RAM
    • DirectX: Version 9.0c
    • Network: Broadband Internet connection
    • Hard Drive: 900 MB available space
    • Sound Card: DirectX compatible
    • Additional Notes: Keyboard, Mouse
    • OS: Windows XP / Vista / 7 / 8
    • Processor: Intel/AMD Singlecore CPU with 1.5 GHz
    • Memory: 1 GB RAM
    • Graphics: 3D with DirectX support and 128 MB RAM
    • DirectX: Version 9.0c
    • Network: Broadband Internet connection
    • Hard Drive: 1200 MB available space
    • Sound Card: DirectX compatible
    • Additional Notes: Keyboard, Mouse
7 人之中有 3 人(43%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.2 記錄時數
Utter crap. Good concept, badly carried out. 60% of the game didn't even work. I want my money back.

No, seriously, I couldn't build units, helicopters, or anything other than structures. Game constantly glitched out and turned the map black, and so many other things I can't even begin to type out. I want my money back, like I stated before.
張貼於:09 月 22 日
1 人之中有 0 人(0%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.3 記錄時數
It's like ♥♥♥♥ing a pixelated gopher.
張貼於:09 月 22 日
1 人之中有 0 人(0%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.6 記錄時數
ill keep this simple .. quite possibly the worst strategy game ive ever bought
張貼於:10 月 16 日
0.3 記錄時數
Its quite an Old school game so it won't just Simply run on Win7 & Win8 you have to get the ww3_patch_v_1_2 to get it to even remotely start to work normally, but other than that the game is smooth. You just gotta fix the settings for resolution and such to get it to work. Overal its good just gotta have alot of patience to even to get it to play
張貼於:09 月 23 日
0.2 記錄時數
For all the people that do not recommend this game: you should probably stop buying games that are older than you :)
Now about the game: It was and still is a great RTS and keep in mind this came out in 2001. It brings back so many good memories and bad (when my WWIII:BG CD got scratched and couldn't play the game anymore). I recommend this game to people that started gaming with 8-bit graphics games, not with COD and CS :)
張貼於:09 月 29 日
42 人之中有 32 人(76%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.7 記錄時數
well worth buying, on a week long offer at the moment on steam, great game. bought this game years ago on CD, but have been unable to get it to work on my laptop. bought it today on steam and it works, happy happy me.
張貼於:05 月 12 日
51 人之中有 29 人(57%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
6.1 記錄時數
First let me sy that I got this for a steal on sale, so can't complain too much, but

Graphics are ok (cir 2005 style), blocky 3D but effective enough
Typical RTS Gameplay, not much reasource management, just drill for Oil -> Money, focus on combat and base bulding

However, overall, this is a pretty flawed game, based on what I played at least (US campaign, then got bored).

Its tough even on normal difficulty, odds are often stacked against you, and silly restrictions (in single player campaign) such as this 1 unit must survive, and no repair capability offered, even between levels!!!?

Enemy AI is pretty simple, but effective enough... units will stay where they are, didn't see a lit of patrolling, and then they swarm as soon as you attack. Own team AI is where most of the problems are... can only set 3 basic tactics per unit/group... chase 'em, stand still, or stay within area. Even on stay within, you units often roam into areas they shouldn't and get picked off easy. Wost part is the route finding... the game relies on building many units and swarming when you outnumber the enemy... often groups of 15-20 units per group. But the pathfinding is bad. often the first 3 or 4 units head in the right direction, and the ones behind bump intoi them and then head off in another direction for an alternate, often with disasterous effects.

Base building is pretty noddy too. no sign of upgrades for most buildings, just build one to access a certain list of units and then forget it. Having to manage power was a nice touch (each gen can power two nearby buildings) which gives some tactical options of blacking-out your enemy buildings... but most of the time you'll get mashed before you get near ur enemies gens.

All in all this seems a dissapointing basic RTS cir 2000... if you want a very cheap nostagic RTS shot then grab it on sale, if not avoid, there are much better ones out there.
張貼於:05 月 14 日
14 人之中有 8 人(57%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.3 記錄時數
Reminds me of Command & Conquer.
張貼於:06 月 20 日
19 人之中有 10 人(53%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.1 記錄時數
Pro-tip: instead of buying the 'Crash to Desktop simulator 1998', take those 74 cents and give them to the heroin addict down the block. Knowing that you just helped fund someone's addiction is way more fulfilling than buying this game is.

1/10: I want that those 74 cents back.
張貼於:07 月 25 日
6 人之中有 3 人(50%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.8 記錄時數
I do not know why this game is getting alot of hate, It works prefect on my Win 7 64 bit Ultimate, And it is very fun. I played through the first tutorial just now and Had a lot of fun. It was easy controls and simple RTS game-play.
張貼於:07 月 21 日
15 人之中有 7 人(47%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.4 記錄時數
I can't believe I wasted money on this. It brings back all the things you forgot old games had problems with - path finding, AI, connecting to another person on LAN and also launching the game in the first place. An old game and not worth it!
張貼於:05 月 27 日
13 人之中有 6 人(46%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.3 記錄時數
Be very careful and look at the date of release before you think of buying this. It's 13 YEARS OLD!! The release date of 2001 is in very small print.
The videos above make it look like a modern game. However, these aren't in game graphics, just footage from cut scenes. When I bought this game, it was being advertised on the main Store screen as being "new!" However that is deliberately misleading and this has now become a very vocal and major issue of the way Steam is deliberately misleading it's customers (some are saying "downright rip off" on many gaming sites and gaming focused YouTube channels).
I find this very sad as Steam used to be held in high regard by myself and many, many others for it's integrity and honesty to it's customers.
As for the gameplay of WW3: Black Gold, it looks very dated now and has been left way behind by so many more modern games in the RTS genre. It just can't be compared to more modern RTS games in ANY possible way.
I bought this game and before playing it, went to visit my big time PC gaming neighbour. By coincidence, he was playing the game and was ranting how he had been "conned" by Steam and cursing the game and it's gameplay. So I sat watching him playing it for a few hours, hoping it would get better the further he got into the game. It didn't.
So when I got back home, I uninstalled it and never bothered with it again. So I haven't logged even a minute of gameplay on it on my own computer. What I saw at my friend's was enough for me.
So when I want an RTS fix, I go for Company of Heroes 1 and 2, Starcraft 2 (both of the already finished games of the intended trilogy), the Warhammer RTS games and the Paradox Grand Strategy games such as Hearts of Iron 3 TFH, Europa Universalis and Crusader Kings 2, etc.
So the lesson to be learned here is that Steam is quickly losing it's integrity and high regard in the gaming industry and so be careful to look at all the small print in the advertising for EVERY game it sells. Plus, assume "new" means the game is new to being available on Steam and not necessarily new as in made in 2014.
I really hope this isn't a downhill spiral and that Steam gets back to how it used to be which made it essential to all PC gamers.
張貼於:07 月 21 日
4 人之中有 1 人(25%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.1 記錄時數
Reminds me of Age of Empires from a few years back. Guide your troops into war, more similarities that I can't think of though. I didn't really enjoy AoE though.
張貼於:07 月 28 日
11 人之中有 4 人(36%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.2 記錄時數
It sucks a ♥♥♥♥
張貼於:05 月 23 日
7 人之中有 1 人(14%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.5 記錄時數
i bought this game thinking it would be like earth 2150, it wasnt, it was like iwas trying to be like earth 2150 and was trying to hard and aside from that, it was to complex making it very difficult to get anything done.
張貼於:07 月 21 日
5.9 記錄時數
It's during the Cold War... Oil are dangerously low... America finding ways to still have vehicles running. Russian generals eager to restore the Soviet Union. And Iraq doesn't care about oil... The great powers declared... World War 3...
張貼於:07 月 10 日
0.4 記錄時數
I regret buying it. It is dated and not fun to play.
張貼於:06 月 25 日
51 人之中有 38 人(75%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
2.7 記錄時數
Boy was I excited when I saw this title on Steam. WWIII:BG is the first real video game I've ever layed and I absolutely loved it. While the gameplay itself may not be up to 2013 RTS standards, the music, ambience, mission creativity, mechanics, and immersion are top notch for its time. Sure there are annoying pathing bugs and stupid AI, but it's definitely not gamebreaking. A nostalgic 10/10.
張貼於:2013 年 09 月 27 日
50 人之中有 30 人(60%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.8 記錄時數
Old but Gold.
張貼於:02 月 3 日
14 人之中有 10 人(71%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
10.4 記錄時數
This is one of the best RTS games I've ever played. It has a slower pace than Starcraft yet it's just as competitive. Most importantly for me I feel it's more forgiving that other RTS games and it has a very enjoyable learning curve.
張貼於:02 月 22 日