Chainsaw Warrior from Games Workshop is the classic nail-biting game for one strong-nerved player! It's the year 2032 and spatial warping has opened a hole into another dimension in the midst of the old municipal buildings at the heart of Manhattan. Bizarre and dangerous creatures are flooding into our dimension, intent on destruction.
使用者評論: 大多好評 (110 篇評論)
發售日: 2013 年 10 月 7 日

登入好來將此遊戲加入您的願望清單或是標記為無興趣

購買 Chainsaw Warrior

 

最近更新 檢視全部(8)

09 月 16 日

Chainsaw Warrior Competition Results

Huge thanks to all who entered our Chainsaw Warrior video competition. We’ve had fun looking though the results and it’s time to share those with you all. See http://aurochdigital.com/2014/08/23/chainsaw-warrior-competition-results/ to see how people did.

Stay tuned as we've got more cool stuff coming!

0 則回應 繼續閱讀

07 月 31 日

Win a copy of the original, 1987, board game!

Ever wanted to own a piece of Games Workshop history? This is your chance, folks! We're giving away a rare copy of the original Chainsaw Warrior board game, first printed way back in 1987.

All you've got to do to win is to record your best playthrough and send it in to us before the 17th of August, so get recording!

You can find all the details for the contest at our website: http://aurochdigital.com/2014/07/29/copies-of-classic-1987-board-game-chainsaw-warrior-up-for-grabs-for-best-playthough/

Good Luck!

4 則回應 繼續閱讀

評論

“Chainsaw Warrior offers excellent value for money, and delivers a faithful reworking of a classic board game.”
8/10 – http://www.game-debate.com/articles/index.php?a_id=2262&game=Chainsaw%20Warrior

“…everything you want in a digitised version of the Games Workshop classic…”
http://www.gamercast.net/chainsaw-warrior-review

“Perfectly judged, brutally demanding and almost impossible to put down...”
The Guardian

關於此遊戲

Chainsaw Warrior from Games Workshop is the classic nail-biting game for one strong-nerved player! It's the year 2032 and spatial warping has opened a hole into another dimension in the midst of the old municipal buildings at the heart of Manhattan. Bizarre and dangerous creatures are flooding into our dimension, intent on destruction. Behind their actions is a controlling intelligence known as 'Darkness', who intends to drag New York back into the warp – destroying it utterly!

Air strikes, ground assaults and WMDs have all failed to stop the swarming forces from beyond. All that remains is a single hope: a shadowy ex-special forces soldier, enhanced for combat and known only as 'Chainsaw Warrior'. Equipped with all the latest high-tech armaments, he must battle his way through to the trans-dimensional ground-zero and defeat Darkness. Not only are there swarms of zombies, mutants, traps, Chaos Agents and other twisted denizens between him and Darkness, time is the enemy too! Only an hour remains to save New York before it is torn from our world forever.

First published as a solo boardgame in 1987, it has been updated, translated and re-engineered for the digital generation. In Chainsaw Warrior it's just you against both the clock and a tide of evil! Can you prevail where all others have failed? You only have 60 minutes to save New York!

系統需求

    Minimum:
    • OS: Windows XP SP3
    • Processor: Intel 1.6GHz Processor or equivalent
    • Memory: 1 GB RAM
    • Hard Drive: 300 MB available space
    Recommended:
    • OS: Windows 7
    • Processor: Dual Core 2.0 or equivalent
    • Memory: 2 GB RAM
    • Graphics: 512 MB Card or above.
    • Hard Drive: 400 MB available space
具參考價值的客戶評論
1 人之中有 0 人(0%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.9 記錄時數
Spielmechanik war leider nicht so dynamisch und cool, wie es auf den ersten Blick erschien :/

2/10
張貼於:09 月 29 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
3.8 記錄時數
I may not have played the original card game, but this digital adaptation is simple yet marvelous. The game itself plays out like a randomized card-game version of a rogue-like. I've seen many complaints about the unfairness of this game, due to its randomized nature and all, but I can't help but feel it's an unfair assumption to assume that just because it's a card game that this game is inherently intended to be a purely strategic experience. What it is at its core, is a quick-playing ride into hell.

Winning is a rarity - I haven't even won one game myself, but I still like to come back to it for a quick playthrough now and then, because it's easy to learn and fun to experiment with. It's nothing more than quick romps through bloodshed and randomized weaponry, but it doesn't pretend to be more than that either. That, and although its randomized nature - including randomizing the player's selection of weapons and items - may make it seem as though there isn't any room for strategy at all, the game does indeed have strategy in the same way most gambling games do. You're hedging your bets. Betting that larger firepower won't be necessary, betting that the monster around the bend WON'T be a radioactive sludge beast, betting you can open that door without wasting bullets and thus saving precious extra in-game time to complete your mission.

You'll come close, it might be painful. But this is the kind of pain I like from a game.
張貼於:10 月 2 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
17 人之中有 12 人(71%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
4.4 記錄時數
Too random, no possibility to make any significant choices beyond choosing the proper equipment after re-rolling the stats a few times, and in the end it just boils down to often failing 1:6 (or less) checks which usually result in immediate death.
Was fun for maybe an hour, before the pattern became clear and uninteresting.
張貼於:07 月 29 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
11 人之中有 8 人(73%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
4.1 記錄時數
+ Cool idea
+ Challenging
+ Great for short sessions

- Relies on CPU generated luck
- UI cluttered
- Basic graphics and audio
- Even too hard on Easy

[Rating: 67/100]
張貼於:08 月 11 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
12 人之中有 8 人(67%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
10.1 記錄時數
Chainsaw Warrior is a game that is very challenging, and is not for everyone. For those that can get into Card and Dice based game play, then you will find this a fun and challenging treat. Based/Remade to resemble the 1987 board game, this game pits one cyber commando on a near impossible mission to wade through tons of traps, mutants, abominations and zombies until he meets and defeats his hardest foe yet, Darkness!

The game uses a simple D6 based rule system. One of the really neat features of the game is you start off by rolling your character stats and equipment options. The built in tutorial does an ok job of explaining everything, there where a few occasions where i was left wondering how the game decided on a certain number i had to meet or beat.

This game is no pushover, and sometimes a bad roll of the dice will just ruin you. For me, that's the fun in it, trying to bounce back from an already bad situation. Even though the odds are stacked against you, there are plenty of goodies and items to help you along your way. All items offer different perks and stat boosts, allowing you to approach the game in a few different ways. Sporting three difficulty modes, it helps oneself get used to how the game works and allows for you to experiment with weapon and item combinations.

Its a simple game at its core, but it has excellent replayability due to its hard difficulty curve and random encounters/events. Pick it up if you are into boardgames or looking for a challenge. The Doctor Approves.
張貼於:05 月 12 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
2 人之中有 2 人(100%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
1.4 記錄時數
You play a muscle bound aryan superman as he stabs, punches and shoots his way across the sub-human denizens of New York and once the sun ges down the freakz go crazy, it's the most realistic simulator of the New York City blackout of 1977 I've ever seen.
張貼於:09 月 15 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
1 人之中有 1 人(100%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
2.7 記錄時數
Awesome oldschool table top gaming but on the PC! Played this game when i was a kid and its exactly as fun a it was then. Graphics and animations are tidy and well put together and the gameplay just keeps attracting you back for more. If you're after a challenge and you like the tabletop dice rolling style of the game play all whilst you're pretending to save New York from a giant rift of the nasties as a badass super cyborg.... then this is for you. Beating the game on easy took me a good few hours... and it reckons the original game was played using the hard setting only.. £4 well spent! :)
張貼於:05 月 9 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
1 人之中有 1 人(100%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
1.1 記錄時數
I DO recomment this game - I think it is an excellent adaptation of the 1987 original.
張貼於:09 月 22 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
1 人之中有 1 人(100%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
1.8 記錄時數
Chainsaws are exciting. Warriors are thrilling. And yet, somehow, Chainsaw Warrior is not quite the be-all-end-all of gaming experiences I hoped it would be. Even so, it's still more enjoyable than any other sci-fi horror Solitaire game on the market. In this PC port of a one-player card game from Games Workshops, you play as the eponymous CHAINSAW WARRIOR, a cybernetically-enhanced combat veteran called back in for one more job - to save New York from a teeming horde of extra-dimensional monstroids led by the entity known only as DARKNESS. After a bit of preliminary character creation (which you have almost no say in), you are sent out into the urban disaster zone to murder your way to the top, hopefully with enough equipment remaining that you can take down the big galoot at the end and save New York from devastation.

The game plays out simply, and although it's highly dependent on luck, there's enough strategy and decision making involved to keep it interesting. After character creation, you head out into the city and are given one hour (120 turns) to plow through the two decks of encounter cards. Although there are some helpful encounters out there (empty rooms, ammo dumps, or short cuts if you're really lucky), most encounters are monsters or traps. Each encounter is likely to injure, poison, irradiate, or simply delay you, any of which will eventually kill you, so it's in your best interests to rush through encounters as quickly as you can. Actually clearing out both decks is next to impossible, but fortunately you (probably) won't have to. The final boss, DARKNESS, is shuffled randomly into the second deck, so you might only need to draw a single card from it to face him... or you might plow through all but one card and die, having performed a Herculean feat but still losing anyway.

Which brings me to the fact that this game is just absurdly unfair. No matter how skilled you are, six-sided dice are fickle things. One bad roll against a monster capable of killing you in a single hit will just end your game. The last boss can only be killed with two particular items, and they can be destroyed or run out of ammo along the way. An early encounter with a monster that reduces your stats permanently can hamstring an otherwise promising hero. Heck, just rolling awful stats in the very beginning, or getting lousy randomly selected equipment, can ruin your chances of victory before you even set foot into the battlefield. It's all aggravating, and the character generation process is drawn out more than it needs to be, and there's no quick reset option, and aaaaugh i hate you i hate you i hate chainsaw warrior diiiiiiie.

...But honestly, winning isn't everything. There's something satisfying about the unpredictable generosity of dice rolls, very much along the lines of rolling a nat 20 and wresting victory from the jaws of defeat. As you play, you learn what threats you'll encounter, how the various items can compensate for your lousy stat rolls, and when it's justifiable to pull out your big guns and waste your precious, precious ammo. And on top of all that, the art style and general aesthetics are just the right kind of schlock 80's cyberpunk crap I adore, mixing Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cartoonery with the occasional spot of authentically disturbing monster design... Just try to ignore the painfully bad voice-acting in the opening cut scene. I'm not about to call this a good game exactly, but it's certainly fun for a while, and the price tag is very easy on the wallet.
張貼於:08 月 7 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
1 人之中有 1 人(100%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
23.9 記錄時數
Disclaimer: this score is full of sarcasm and irony. As always.

Score out of 10:
-Graphics: 1.0-9.0, what should I say...? It's a real Card game, with, you know, real cards...
-Game engine: 6.2, has some minor flaws, like "keybindings" options without even working keys, except mouse, and long waiting time for main menu (i suppose it's whole game resetting process), but that's all acceptable.
-Game mechanics: Board version 8.0 / Binary version 0.0 (it's not a smile), see below.
-Game addiction: 9.5, like any Rogue-like game with permadeath.
-Gameplay: 8.1, really strange for such simple, but it's interesting.

TOTAL: 1d6+4
So, it's hard to judge this game for two reasons. First of all, it's a digital remake of old board game. Second of all, it's a 2014 now.
Game developers had not so many options to make it nice to old fans and new-coming players. At least to make user interface perfect, while you are not able to change or improve game mechanics. Why I can not turn "intro" comics OFF by default? Why the hell all three active areas (Cards deck, HTH-Shoot-da-Whoop and Roll buttons, Continue button) are in three different corners of the screen? Why asking always for something, that's present in single (weapon for Hth, for example). Why always Rolling character in beggining with SO many dumb button press? There is a rule : program should wait for user interaction IF and ONLY IF user can change the state of program. Here you have to press 7 times some "skip"-like button, just to see numbers appear on the screen. Hell, thanks, but no.
On the one hand, game mechanics are pure random in nature: "adventure map" - shuffled card deck, combat - dice based.
On the other hand, game is hard to play and has a "moment of choice", moreover game will always punish you for mistake. You are not only skipping turns, waiting for some "random" output and lucky end. You have enough possibilities to change outcome, though they are limited.

The original game lacks of "horizontal balance": most of ingame items (cloth, weapon, device) can be separed on usefull in 100% cases and useless in 100% cases. That's bad. Another problem is small amount of such items at all.

With all that said : it's fun to play. Although, this game cannot be called Rogue-like for multiple reasons, it shares some of their properties, which makes it perfect for me, but me boring for others. AGAIN total score for this game makes more sense than it looks like: 1d6+4 out of 10.
張貼於:08 月 9 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
3 人之中有 2 人(67%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
3.3 記錄時數
Very Good game. Never played the original physical game, but i'd imagine that this would do it great justice.

Its ridiculously hard, even on easy difficultly the entire mechanic of the game is there to screw you over, its fun but irritating, frustrating and sometimes downright hilarious when it all goes wrong in just a few turns (especially when you've had some really lucky rolls whilst creating your characters stats)

Ive not finished the game yet (even on easy) but i can imagine that it would extremely satisfying to finally get through.

If you are a fan of the "Choose you own Adventure" books this will probably be something you'll enjoy.
張貼於:06 月 20 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
3 人之中有 2 人(67%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
1.7 記錄時數
Sweet Jesus this game is incredible.

If you like ultra-violent, randomized, super-tough games, this one is for you. If you don't like those thing, you have terrible taste in games.
張貼於:07 月 30 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
9 人之中有 5 人(56%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
1.6 記錄時數
Awesome remake of board game. Oldschool monstrous setting, dark atmosphere. Nice thing for the board games lovers.
張貼於:07 月 29 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
2 人之中有 1 人(50%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
1.5 記錄時數
It's like playing solitaire with random death and very little choice other than pressing NEXT. Not really recommended.
張貼於:08 月 19 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
1 人之中有 0 人(0%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.8 記錄時數
I don't get this game. Someone explain it to me. So many distracting graphics on the cards. What the ♥♥♥♥ is what? Srsly...
張貼於:08 月 5 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
1 人之中有 0 人(0%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.7 記錄時數
Don't. Just don't. Unless you're actually old enough to have nostalgia for this game, it's not worth it.
張貼於:05 月 4 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
3 人之中有 0 人(0%)認為這篇評論有參考價值
0.3 記錄時數
Terrible game. Don't waste even a dollar on it.
張貼於:08 月 7 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
4.1 記錄時數
A very nice recreation of the orginal board game. And it means I can "look ahead" in the deck any more.
張貼於:06 月 26 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
4.0 記錄時數
For $5.00, is this game worth it? My answer would be yes, as despite the random, luck based nature of the game, and its brutal difficulty, there is some enjoyment to be had here. It's based on a single-player card and dice game from the 1980s. I hadn't heard of it until the release of this version. I find it odd that it is single player as I can see the premise working well with multiple people, but I digress.

In this game, you choose a difficulty, and roll dice for your stats. Depending on your difficulty, you'll roll 1-3 dice and take various values, explained in game for your stats. Then you roll for so many equipment points, and you decide what type of equipment to take with you on your journey. From there, it comes down to what cards you draw and what equipment you have.

Your goal is to get through one deck of 54 cards, and then through a second deck until you find "Darkness", the ultimate evil looking to destroy the city. Oh, and you only have one hour to do this. Every time you draw a card or engage in combat you lose 30 seconds, and you can lose time for other reasons as well. If you run out of time, well, that's it, you lose.

This game takes pleasure in screwing you, in various ways. For instance, it's entirely possible that the only weapon that can defeat the final boss, The Laser Lance, can be destroyed during the course of your game, or you can run out of ammo for it, and have to start a deck all over to get a new one. You can be forced to start over due to running into a giant chasm, running into a locked door without a way to open/break it, etcetera.

Despite this frustration, there is enjoyment to be had here, and for $5.00, you can't really go wrong.
張貼於:05 月 6 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?
9.1 記錄時數
A very fun rpg/ pen and paper roll playing game. The mechanics are pretty good and hey it's an indy studio... why not support 'em :)
張貼於:05 月 7 日
這篇評論有參考價值嗎?