A Terceira Guerra Mundial eclodiu e um exército liderado pelos Soviéticos lançou um ataque-surpresa contra os E.U.A. Lidere as suas tropas em batalhas frenéticas desenroladas em campos de combate totalmente destrutíveis. A estratégia combina-se com a acção intensa neste confronto épico entre super-potências!
Análises de utilizadores:
Recentes:
Muito positivas (20 análises) - 90% das 20 análises de utilizadores nos últimos 30 dias são positivas.
No geral:
Praticamente positivas (598 análises) - 72% das 598 análises de utilizadores sobre este jogo são positivas.
Data de lançamento: 18 Set, 2007

Inicia a sessão para adicionares este artigo à tua lista de desejos, segui-lo ou dispensá-lo.

 

Acerca deste jogo

A Terceira Guerra Mundial eclodiu e um exército liderado pelos Soviéticos lançou um ataque-surpresa contra os E.U.A. Lidere as suas tropas em batalhas frenéticas desenroladas em campos de combate totalmente destrutíveis. A estratégia combina-se com a acção intensa neste confronto épico entre super-potências!

  • Campanha de um jogador incrivelmente realista, com frentes de batalha baseadas em localidades, subúrbios e cidades reais da América, Europa e U.R.S.S.

  • Assuma o comando total de quatro funções diferentes — Aérea, Blindados, Infantaria e Suporte — neste fundamental jogo multi-jogador online por equipa.

  • Arrase campos de batalha inteiros com poderosa artilharia, napalm devastador, armas nucleares e outras armas tácticas auxiliares.

Requisitos do Sistema

    • Sistemas operativos suportados: Windows XP, Windows Vista

    • Processador: 2,5 GHz ou superior

    • Memória: 1024 MB (1,5 GB para o Windows Vista)

    • Placa gráfica: 256 MB de RAM de vídeo, compatível com DirectX 9.0c

    • Versão DirectX: 9.0c

    • Disco rígido: 8 GB ou mais de espaço livre em disco

    • Placa de som: compatível com DirectX 9.0c
Análises de clientes
Sistema de análises de utilizadores atualizado! Fica a saber mais
Recentes:
Muito positivas (20 análises)
No geral:
Praticamente positivas (598 análises)
Publicadas recentemente
Oh My, Brexit!
( 12.0 hrs em registo )
Publicada: 24 de Junho
This game was brief, but very much worth it. This is a refreshment to everyone tired of strategy games that either take place in space or 1944 Europe.
ZombieFred
( 30.4 hrs em registo )
Publicada: 20 de Junho
Holy jesus. This game is one of the greatest games ive ever played. Nukes, RTS, Cold War turned WW3. Its like C&C Generals, but different and awesome at being different. Hard to explain.
Nuttex
( 9.0 hrs em registo )
Publicada: 13 de Junho
Note: this is the exact same review I posted on Soviet Assault - it gives the background on what happened to World in Conflict and why I still recommend it.

An excellent game, one of the best RTS/RTT titles out ever. Shame it got all but killed off by Ubisoft just to give a better chance to their train wreck known as Tom Clancy's EndWar.

In case you missed the story of what happened to World in Conflict, let me give you a short rundown.
World in Conflict comes out in 2007 and quickly becomes one of the best received games that year. Gameplay is fantastic, performance considering graphics is phenomenal and multiplayer is better than ever (and that's with a great singleplayer campaign). Things are looking pretty good for Massive. They announce a expansion pack called Soviet Assault that would bring the game over to consoles and add the Soviet campaign into the game. For people who wouldn't buy it and instead choose to stick with the vanilla game, it'd mean free content in multiplayer. The game continues to receive constant patches and free new maps.

Around the same time, Ubisoft announced Tom Clancy's EndWar. It was a console exclusive aimed at trying to make RTS genre work with controllers (for that they went with voice commands). Unfortunately for them, World in Conflict was looking to beat them in that regard with their new expansion pack.

In 2008, Activision Blizzard came to be. They decided to close down or sell off some studios. Massive, being owned by Sierra, was one of the victims of that. And that's when Ubisoft came in. Massive and World in Conflict brand got sold off to Ubisoft. What followed this was a delay of Soviet Assault for unknown period of time and somewhat lucklustre support of new free content. The player base began to slowly decrease over time. EndWar came out on consoles and turned out to be exactly what it looked in trailers - mediocre at best. That said, it sold well at the time, if memory serves well. Eventually Soviet Assault was released in 2009, but at that point console support was dropped. The whole situation was rather bittersweet. The game got a few more maps in multiplayer and new Soviet missions that were integrated into the original campaign.

At that point, Massive went off everybody's radar. For the lack of a better term, the studio became a sweatshop of DLC content and assets for Ubisoft games as far as I can tell. The Division was their first own project that'd involve an actual game and judging by everyone's current reaction in Steam, it was a train wreck (which isn't particularly surprising, considering that Ubisoft was the publisher, and Massive worked with three other studios on the same project).

tl;dr You're looking at the obituary of a great game, courtesy of Ubisoft. You can still experience the singleplayer campaign, but alas the multiplayer servers have been shut down. The only way you can try it out for yourself is LAN games that get organised once in a while.
loadedstorm88
( 3.9 hrs em registo )
Publicada: 5 de Junho
Hands down one of the best RTS games ever made, even though its not a unit building type games as Command & Conquer or Company of Heroes genre, still a very enjoyable game. Wish they could have made a sequel.
EternalSilence
( 0.2 hrs em registo )
Publicada: 4 de Junho
As of 2016 and windows 10, this game does not work.
If you have played this game on release, you know it had a nice story and good gameplay in the campaign.
The MP was sometimes epic and pretty good.

Now, Ubisoft closed the servers and doesnt support this game anymore.
Making this game unplayable on modern pc's (dx 10, windows 10).
Thats also the reason you cannot buy this game anymore on steam.
[RPPK] Pixel
( 0.8 hrs em registo )
Publicada: 1 de Junho
Buy this game on GOG not steam. Steam version crashs on start up or if you click on anything int he menu
larkins1981
( 0.4 hrs em registo )
Publicada: 1 de Junho
always crashed on first campaign mission
InstantAce
( 0.6 hrs em registo )
Publicada: 29 de Maio
THE BEST RTS I HAVE EVER PLAYED

Great game, good story, innovative controls, good pace for an RTS, great online play.

If you haven’t played this game then you are missing out 10/10

P.S. Massive please make a World in Conflict 2
declan1542
( 15.9 hrs em registo )
Publicada: 28 de Maio
one of the most beautiful games out in terms of graphics and voice acting
DoctorOobleck1775
( 52.9 hrs em registo )
Publicada: 27 de Maio
Overall, a good rts and nice they tried the cold war genre of strategy gaming.If you loved the concept of red dawn of homefront, youll most likely enjoy this. But understand if you adore rts games with base building this isnt that type. You select where the landings grounds for reinforcements are, you can strong point key positions, and you can garrision most buildings, but it isnt like command and conquer or halo wars where you establish a main base and your mostly committed to that one location. However, while it may not offer base building it most certainly doesnt lack in content. The campaign is interesting and the combat is good enough at the higher levels to warrant a replay. The combat tends to be rather fluid and changes every drastically, especially when tactical aid is used. Game play rarely to not have a dull moment and is a attention grabber. Worth the cost easily, if you are on the fence about purchasing it i advise it as long as it has no finanical repercussions.
Análises mais úteis  Nos últimos 30 dias
82 de 98 pessoas (84%) acharam esta análise útil
1 pessoa achou esta análise engraçada
Não recomendado
0.2 hrs em registo
Publicada: 4 de Junho
As of 2016 and windows 10, this game does not work.
If you have played this game on release, you know it had a nice story and good gameplay in the campaign.
The MP was sometimes epic and pretty good.

Now, Ubisoft closed the servers and doesnt support this game anymore.
Making this game unplayable on modern pc's (dx 10, windows 10).
Thats also the reason you cannot buy this game anymore on steam.
Achaste esta análise útil? Sim Não Engraçada
15 de 16 pessoas (94%) acharam esta análise útil
1 pessoa achou esta análise engraçada
Recomendado
0.6 hrs em registo
Publicada: 29 de Maio
THE BEST RTS I HAVE EVER PLAYED

Great game, good story, innovative controls, good pace for an RTS, great online play.

If you haven’t played this game then you are missing out 10/10

P.S. Massive please make a World in Conflict 2
Achaste esta análise útil? Sim Não Engraçada
10 de 14 pessoas (71%) acharam esta análise útil
1 pessoa achou esta análise engraçada
Recomendado
0.8 hrs em registo
Publicada: 1 de Junho
Buy this game on GOG not steam. Steam version crashs on start up or if you click on anything int he menu
Achaste esta análise útil? Sim Não Engraçada
5 de 5 pessoas (100%) acharam esta análise útil
1 pessoa achou esta análise engraçada
Recomendado
15.9 hrs em registo
Publicada: 28 de Maio
one of the most beautiful games out in terms of graphics and voice acting
Achaste esta análise útil? Sim Não Engraçada
4 de 4 pessoas (100%) acharam esta análise útil
Recomendado
9.0 hrs em registo
Publicada: 13 de Junho
Note: this is the exact same review I posted on Soviet Assault - it gives the background on what happened to World in Conflict and why I still recommend it.

An excellent game, one of the best RTS/RTT titles out ever. Shame it got all but killed off by Ubisoft just to give a better chance to their train wreck known as Tom Clancy's EndWar.

In case you missed the story of what happened to World in Conflict, let me give you a short rundown.
World in Conflict comes out in 2007 and quickly becomes one of the best received games that year. Gameplay is fantastic, performance considering graphics is phenomenal and multiplayer is better than ever (and that's with a great singleplayer campaign). Things are looking pretty good for Massive. They announce a expansion pack called Soviet Assault that would bring the game over to consoles and add the Soviet campaign into the game. For people who wouldn't buy it and instead choose to stick with the vanilla game, it'd mean free content in multiplayer. The game continues to receive constant patches and free new maps.

Around the same time, Ubisoft announced Tom Clancy's EndWar. It was a console exclusive aimed at trying to make RTS genre work with controllers (for that they went with voice commands). Unfortunately for them, World in Conflict was looking to beat them in that regard with their new expansion pack.

In 2008, Activision Blizzard came to be. They decided to close down or sell off some studios. Massive, being owned by Sierra, was one of the victims of that. And that's when Ubisoft came in. Massive and World in Conflict brand got sold off to Ubisoft. What followed this was a delay of Soviet Assault for unknown period of time and somewhat lucklustre support of new free content. The player base began to slowly decrease over time. EndWar came out on consoles and turned out to be exactly what it looked in trailers - mediocre at best. That said, it sold well at the time, if memory serves well. Eventually Soviet Assault was released in 2009, but at that point console support was dropped. The whole situation was rather bittersweet. The game got a few more maps in multiplayer and new Soviet missions that were integrated into the original campaign.

At that point, Massive went off everybody's radar. For the lack of a better term, the studio became a sweatshop of DLC content and assets for Ubisoft games as far as I can tell. The Division was their first own project that'd involve an actual game and judging by everyone's current reaction in Steam, it was a train wreck (which isn't particularly surprising, considering that Ubisoft was the publisher, and Massive worked with three other studios on the same project).

tl;dr You're looking at the obituary of a great game, courtesy of Ubisoft. You can still experience the singleplayer campaign, but alas the multiplayer servers have been shut down. The only way you can try it out for yourself is LAN games that get organised once in a while.
Achaste esta análise útil? Sim Não Engraçada
4 de 5 pessoas (80%) acharam esta análise útil
Recomendado
3.9 hrs em registo
Publicada: 5 de Junho
Hands down one of the best RTS games ever made, even though its not a unit building type games as Command & Conquer or Company of Heroes genre, still a very enjoyable game. Wish they could have made a sequel.
Achaste esta análise útil? Sim Não Engraçada
2 de 2 pessoas (100%) acharam esta análise útil
Recomendado
30.4 hrs em registo
Publicada: 20 de Junho
Holy jesus. This game is one of the greatest games ive ever played. Nukes, RTS, Cold War turned WW3. Its like C&C Generals, but different and awesome at being different. Hard to explain.
Achaste esta análise útil? Sim Não Engraçada
1 de 1 pessoas (100%) acharam esta análise útil
Recomendado
12.0 hrs em registo
Publicada: 24 de Junho
This game was brief, but very much worth it. This is a refreshment to everyone tired of strategy games that either take place in space or 1944 Europe.
Achaste esta análise útil? Sim Não Engraçada
Análises mais úteis  No geral
466 de 545 pessoas (86%) acharam esta análise útil
639 pessoas acharam esta análise engraçada
Recomendado
47.4 hrs em registo
Publicada: 22 de Julho de 2015
>Buy Game
>Get No Hope Mod as it sounds good
>choose 1 Vs 1 so i can use all units
>play match against bots as The Mighty Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
> listen to werid emo music that modder put in
>sent in infanty to occupy buildings
>Blitkrieg with Tanks to get control points.
>They Get wrecked by USA
>Infanty get blown up by airstrike
>SadFace.jpg
>WomenCrying.jpeg
>i get mad sent in more units and napalm the ♥♥♥♥ out USA Infanty ( I love the smell of napalm in the moring)
>My units Get wrecked by USA artillery
>USA gonna win
>NotGood.jpg
>Repel USA assualt on last contol point timer going down 20 mins left
>i see i have enough points for ICBM i sit there looking at the screen my fingers trembling.
>lose last control point as artillery blows the ♥♥♥♥ out of everything
>i click on Nuke as sweat drips down my forehead
>Big Flash
> what have i done
>everyone dead
>game ends in draw
>i look out my window wondering about the death i have caused
>i get depressed
>Girlfriend yells at me that its only a game but is it?
> I scream YOU WERENT THERE (cause she was a work that day)
> i start drinking
>Girlfriend leaves me
>lose part time job in mcdonalds
>live in a one room flat eating a sandwhich “Just chicken,” I sigh, before turning to look at the last picture i ever took of my wife. “No mayo,” as tear streams down my face.


10/10 would Nuke USA again
Achaste esta análise útil? Sim Não Engraçada
179 de 196 pessoas (91%) acharam esta análise útil
Recomendado
Publicada: 4 de Novembro de 2013
From the developer of Ground Control and Ground Control 2, I really shouldn't have to say anything more than that.

Though now defunct, this real time strategy features one of the most unique multiplayer systems. Each player on a team assumes controle of a different branch: Infantry, Armor, Air, or Support. This makes for a more cooperational multiplayer experience that you can't get in any other real time strategy, perfect for a LAN party. Much like the Ground Control series, this game has no base building and relies entirely on dropping units into supply zones and maximizing their utility.

The single player campagin is very scripted allowing for spectacular showcases of destruction. I play through it every few years. The graphical fidelity of this game crushed computers upon release and they still hold up to this day.

Sure to please any fan of the real time strategy genre, as a fairly hidden gem, this title would make a wonderful gift.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_in_Conflict
Achaste esta análise útil? Sim Não Engraçada